Disruption of transfer entropy and inter-hemispheric brain functional connectivity in patients with disorder of consciousness

Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Volumn 7, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Mäki Marttunen, Verónica ^a,b   Diez, Ibai ^c   Cortes, Jesus M ^c,d   Chialvo, Dante R ^b   Villarreal, Mirta ^a,b  

^a FLENI   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c BIOCRUCES BIZKAIA HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Spain)

^d BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

Author keywords

BOLD signal; Brain networks; Disorder of consciousness; Functional connectivity; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Partial correlation; Resting state; Transfer entropy

Indexed keywords

AMYGDALA; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMA; COMATOSE PATIENT; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONSCIOUSNESS DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ENTROPY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL DISSOCIATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEAD MOVEMENT; HEMISPHERE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; IMAGE ARTIFACT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEFT HANDEDNESS; NEUROREHABILITATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SENSORY CORTEX; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

EID: 85061302715     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625196     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00024     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ashburner, J., and Friston, K. (1999). Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 254–266. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:4<254::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-G
2. Barnett, L., Barrett, A., and Seth, A. (2009). Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 238701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.238701
3. Beckmann, C., DeLuca, M., Devlin, J., and Smith, S. (2005). Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 1001–1013. doi: 10.1098/rstb. 2005.1634
4. Bonachela, J., Hinrichsen, H., and noz, M. M. (2008). Entropy estimates of small data sets. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 41, 202001. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/41/20/202001
5. Boveroux, P., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Bruno, M. A., Noirhomme, Q., Lauwick, S., Luxen, A., et al. (2010). Breakdown of within-and between-network resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity. Anesthesiology 113, 1038–1053. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f697f5
6. Cauda, F., Micon, B., Sacco, K., Duca, S., D’Agata, F., Geminiani, G., et al. (2009). Disrupted intrinsic functional connectivity in the vegetative state. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 429–431. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.142349
7. Cover, T., and Thomas, J. (2006). Elements of Information Theory. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8. de Pasquale, F., Penna, S. D., Snyder, A., Marzetti, L., Pizzella, V., Romani, G., et al. (2012). A cortical core for dynamic integration of functional networks in the resting human brain. Neuron 74, 753–764.
9. de Pasquale, F., Della Penna, S., Snyder, A. Z., Lewis, C., Mantini, D., Marzetti, L., et al. (2010). Temporal dynamics of spontaneous meg activity in brain networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 6040–6045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913863107
10. Fox, M., Snyder, A., Vincent, J., Corbetta, M., Essen, D. V., and Raichle, M. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorre-lated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102
11. Gaillard, R., Dehaene, S., Adam, C., Clemenceau, S., Hasboun, D., Baulac, M., et al. (2009). Converging intracranial markers of conscious access. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000061
12. Ganzetti, M., and Mantini, D. (2013). Functional connectivity and oscilla-tory activity in the resting human brain. Neuroscience 240, 297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.02.032
13. Giacino, J., Kalmar, K., and Whyte, J. (2004). The jfk coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 2020–2029. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033
14. Heine, L., Soddu, A., Gomez, F., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Tshibanda, L., Thonnard, M., et al. (2012). Resting state networks and consciousness: alterations of multiple resting state network connectivity in physiological, pharmacological, and pathological consciousness states. Front. Psychol. 3:295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00295
15. Hudetz, A. (2012) General anesthesia and human brain connectivity. Brain Connect. 2, 291–302. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0107
16. Jaynes, E. (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106, 620–630. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
17. Nir, Y., Mukamel, R., Dinstein, I., Privman, E., Harel, M., Fisch, L., et al. (2008). Interhemispheric correlations of slow spontaneous neuronal fluctuations revealed in human sensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1100–1108. doi: 10.1038/nn.2177
18. Noirhomme, Q., Soddu, A., Lehembre, R., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Boveroux, P., Boly, M., et al. (2010). Brain connectivity in pathological and pharmacological coma. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:160. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00160
19. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
20. Ovadia-Caro, S., Nir, Y., Soddu, A., Ramot, M., Hesselmann, G., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., et al. (2012). Reduction in inter-hemispheric connectivity in disorders of consciousness. PLoS ONE 7:e37238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037238
21. Paninski, L. (2003) Estimation of entropy and mutual information. Neural Comp. 15, 1191–1254. doi: 10.1162/089976603321780272
22. Panzeri, S., and Treves, A. (1996). Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 7, 87–107. doi: 10.1088/0954-898X/7/1/006
23. Peng, H., Mutual Information Toolbox. Available online at: http://home.penglab. com/software/HanchuanPengSoftware/software.html
24. Perri, C. D., Stender, J., Laureys, S., and Gosseries, O. (2013). Functional neu-roanatomy of disorders of consciousness. Epilepsy Behav. pii: S1525-5050(13) 00480-0. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.09.014
25. Power, J., Barnes, K., Snyder, A., Schlaggar, B., and Petersen, S. (2012). Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity mri networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018
26. Raichle, M., MacLeod, A., Snyder, A., Powers, W., Gusnard, D., and Shulman, G. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 676–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
27. Rosanova, M., Gosseries, O., Casarotto, S., Boly, M., Casali, A. G., Bruno, M. A., et al. (2012). Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain 135, 1308–1320. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr340
28. Schreiber, T. (2000). Measuring information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 461–464. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.461
29. Seth, A., Izhikevich, E., Reeke, G., and Edelman, G. (2006). Theories and measures of consciousness: an extended framework. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 10799–10804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604347103
30. Teasdale, G., and Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 2, 81–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0
31. Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neurosci. 5:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-5-42
32. Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., et al. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15, 273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
33. van den Heuvel, M., and Sporns, O. (2011). Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J. Neurosci. 31, 15775–15786. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3539-11.2011
34. Vidal, J., Freyermuth, S., Jerbi, K., Hamame, C., Ossandon, T., Bertrand, O., et al. (2012). Long-distance amplitude correlations in the high gamma band reveal segregation and integration within the reading network. J. Neuroscience. 32, 6421–6434. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4363-11.2012