The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2020-2029

  Giacino, Joseph T ^a   Kalmar, Kathleen ^a   Whyte, John ^b  

^a JFK JOHNSON REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coma; Minimally conscious state; Outcome assessment (health care); Persistent vegetative state; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURY; COMA; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 9944231914     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Plum F., Posner J. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. 3rd ed. :1982;FA Davis, Philadelphia
2. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). Multi-Society Task Force Report on PVS [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 330:1994;1499-1508
3. Giacino J.T., Ashwal S., Childs N., et al. The minimally conscious state definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 58:2002;349-353
4. Ansell B.J., Keenan J.E. The Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 70:1989;104-108
5. Rader M.A., Alston J.B., Ellis D.W. Sensory stimulation of severely brain-injured patients. Brain Inj. 3:1989;141-147
6. Giacino J.T., Kezmarsky M.A., DeLuca J., Cicerone K.D. Monitoring rate of recovery to predict outcome in minimally responsive patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 72:1991;897-901
7. Rappaport M., Dougherty A.M., Kelting D.L. Evaluation of coma and vegetative states. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 73:1992;628-634
8. Teasdale G., Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 2:1974;81-84
9. Hagan C., Malkmus D., Durham P. Levels of cognitive function. Rehabilitation of the head injured adult comprehensive physical management. 1979;Professional Staff Association, Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Downey (CA)
10. O'Dell M.W., Jasin P., Lyons N., Stivers M., Meszaro F. Standardized assessment instruments for minimally-responsive, brain-injured patients. NeuroRehabil. 6:1996;45-55
11. Giacino J.T., Kalmar K., Chase R.F. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale further evidence for applicability in grading level of neurobehavioral responsiveness following severe brain injury [abstract]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 74:1993;662
12. O'Dell M.W., Jasin P., Stivers M., Lyons N., Schmidt S., Moore D.E. Interrater reliability of the Coma Recovery Scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 11:(3):1996;61-66
13. Rappaport M., Hall K.M., Hopkins K., Belleza T., Cope D.N. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 63:1982;118-123
14. Giacino J.T., Kalmar K. The vegetative and minimally conscious states a comparison of clinical features and functional outcome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 12:(4):1997;36-51
15. Thompson N., Sherer M., Nick T., et al. Predicting change in functional outcomes in minimally responsive patients using the Coma Recovery Scale [abstract]. Arch Clin Neuropsyhol. 14:1999;790-791
16. Hamilton B.B., Granger C.V., Sherwin F.S., Zielezny M., Tashman J.S. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. Fuhrer M.J. Rehabilitation outcomes analysis and measurement. 1987;137-147 Brookes, Baltimore
17. Kalmar K., Giacino J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale: an ordinal or interval measure? [abstract]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 81:2000;1619
18. Wright B.D., Masters G. Rating scale analysis. 1982;Mesa Pr, Chicago
19. Johnston M.V., Keith R.A., Hinderer S.R. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 73:(Suppl 12):1992;S3-S23
20. Hall K., Cope D.N., Rappaport M. Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 66:1985;35-37
21. Gouvier W.D., Blanton P.D., LaPorte K.K., Nepomuceno C. Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 68:1987;94-97
22. Hall K.M., Johnston M.V. Outcomes evaluation in TBI rehabilitation. Part II: measurement tools for a nationwide data system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 75:(12 Spec No):1994;SC10-SC18. discussion SC27-8
23. Whyte J., DiPasquale M.C. Assessment of vision and visual attention in minimally responsive brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 76:1995;804-810
24. Whyte J., DiPasquale M.C., Vaccaro M. Assessment of command-following in minimally conscious brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 80:1999;653-660
25. Whyte J., Laborde A., DiPasquale M.C. Assessment and treatment of the vegetative and minimally conscious patient. Rosenthal M., Griffith E.R., Kreutzer J., Pentland B. Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury. 3rd ed. :1999;435-452 FA Davis, Philadelphia
26. Tresch D.D., Sims F.H., Duthie E.H., Goldstein M.D., Lane P.S. Clinical characteristics of patients in the persistent vegetative state. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 151:1991;930-932
27. Childs N.L., Mercer W.N., Childs H.W. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology. 43:1993;1465-1467
28. Andrews K., Murphy L., Munday R., Littlewood C. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ. 313:1996;13-16