Time and scheduling

The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 498-520

  Winship, Christopher ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Female labor force; Hierarchies; Household division of labor; Scheduling; Scheduling conflicts; Scheduling dynamics; Segregation; Social life; Social sciences; Time

Indexed keywords

EID: 85061145936     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.21     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Arrow, K. J. (1951), Social Choice and Individual Values (New York: Wiley).
2. Becker, G. S. (1965), ‘A Theory of the Allocation of Time’, Economic Journal, 75: 493–517.
3. Bender, J., and Wellbery, D. E. (1991) (eds.), Chronotypes: The Construction of Time (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press).
4. Bergmann, W. (1992), ‘The Problem of Time in Sociology: An Overview of the Literature on the State of Theory and Research on the “Sociology of Time”, 1900–82’, Time and Society, 1 (1): 81–134.
5. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., and Mikie, M. A. (2006) The Changing Rhythms of American Life (New York: Russell Sage).
6. Bourdieu, P. [1963] (1990), ‘Time Perspectives of the Kabyle’, in J. Hassard (ed.), The Sociology of Time (New York: St Martin's), 219–37.
7. Carter, M. W. (1986), ‘A Survey of Practical Applications of Examination Timetabling Algorithms’, Operations Research, 34: 193–202.
8. Condorcet, M. de (1785), Essai sur l’application de L’analyse à la probabilité des decisions rendues a la pluraliste des voix (Paris).
9. Drake, S. C., and Cayton, H. B. (1945), Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in a Northern City (New York: Harcourt).
10. Ellis, M., and Parks, V. (2004), ‘Work Together, Live Apart? Geographies of Racial and Ethnic Segregation at Home and atWork’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94 (3): 620–37.
11. Epstein, C. F., and Kalleberg, A. L. (2006) (eds.), Fighting for Time: Shifting Boundaries of Work and Social Life (New York: Russell Sage).
12. Fox, D. P., and Gottfredson, D. C. (2003), ‘Differentiating Completers from Noncompleters of a Family-based Prevention Program’, Journal of Primary Prevention, 24 (2): 111–24.
13. Gell, A. (1996), The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images (Oxford: Berg).
14. Grimmett, G. R., and McDiarmid, C. J. H. (1975), ‘On Colouring Random Graphs’, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 77: 313–24.
15. Hägerstrand, T. (1970), ‘What About People in Regional Science?’, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 24: 7–21.
16. Hägerstrand, T. (1973), ‘The Domain of Human Geography’, in R. J. Chorley (ed.), Directions in Geography (London: Methuen).
17. Hägerstrand, T. (1975), ‘Space, Time and Human Conditions’, in A. Karlqvist and E. F. Snickars (eds.), Allocation of Urban Space (Farnborough: Saxton House).
18. Hammermesh, D. S., and Pfann, G. A. (2005a) (eds.), The Economics of Time Use (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
19. Hammermesh, D. S., and Pfann, G. A. (2005b), ‘Introduction: Time-use Data in Economics’, in Hammermesh and Pfann (eds.), The Economics of Time Use (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
20. Hassard, J. (1990), The Sociology of Time (London: Macmillan).
21. Herz, D., and Devens, R. M. (2001), ‘The American Time-use Survey’, Industrial Relations, 40 (3): 526–9.
22. Hochschild, A. (1989), The Second Shift (New York: Avon).
23. Jacobs, J. A., and Gerson, K. (2004), The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
24. Kellerman, A. (1989), Time, Space and Society: Geographical Societal Perspectives (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
25. Killingsworth, M. R., and Heckman, J. J. (1987), ‘Female Labor Supply: A Survey’, in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (North-Holland: Elsevier), 103–204.
26. Kornblum, W. (1974), Blue Collar Community (Chicago, III.: University of Chicago Press).
27. Kraak, M. (2003), ‘The Space–Time Cube Revisited From a Geovisualization Perspective’, proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference, Durban, South Africa, 16 October.
28. Kwan, M. P. (1998), ‘Space–Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-based Framework’, Geographical Analysis, 30 (3): 191–216.
29. Landes, D. (1983), Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
30. Leifer, E. M. (1990), ‘Enacting Networks: The Probability of Fairness’, Social Networks, 12 (1): 1–25.
31. McPherson, J. M., and Ranger-Moore, J. R. (1991), ‘Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Bias Space’, Social Forces, 70: 19–42.
32. McPherson, M., and Rotolo, T. (1996), ‘Testing a Dynamic Model of Social Composition: Diversity and Change in Voluntary Groups’, American Sociological Review, 61: 179–202.
33. Malinowski, B. (1927), ‘Lunar and Seasonal Calendars in the Trobriands’, Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 57: 203–15.
34. Märtensson, S. (1979), ‘On the Formation of Biographies in Space–Time Environments’, Lund Studies in Geography, 47: 151–62.
35. Melbin, M. (1987), Night as Frontier: Colonizing the World After Dark (New York: Free Press).
36. Miller, H. J. (1991), ‘Modeling Accessibility Using Space–Time Prism Concepts With in Geographical Information Systems’, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5: 287–301.
37. Popielarz, P. A., and McPherson, J. M. (1995), ‘On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships’, American Journal of Sociology, 101 (3): 698–720.
38. Pred, A. (1977), ‘The Choreography of Existence: Comments on Hagerstrand's Time geography and its Usefulness’, Economic Geography, 53: 207–21.
39. Pred, A. (1984), ‘Place as a Historically Contingent Process: Structuration and the Time geography of Becoming Place’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74 (2): 279–97.
40. Presser, H. B. (2003), Working in a 24/7 Economy: Challenges for American Families (New York: Russell Sage).
41. Rissman, J. (2000), ‘Same As It NeverWas: Realizing the Vision of Smaller Communities of Learners at Arlington High School’, executive summary, Arlington High School, St Paul, Minn.
42. Ruckstuhl, K. E., and Neuhaus, P. (2005) (eds.), Sexual Segregation in Vertebrates’ Ecology of the Two Sexes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
43. Schwartz, B. (1974), ‘Waiting, Exchange and Power: The Distribution of Time in Social Systems’, American Journal of Sociology, 79: 841–70.
44. Sorokin, P., and Merton, R. (1937), ‘Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis’, American Journal of Sociology, 42: 615–29.
45. Staines, G. L., and Pleck, J. H. (1983), The Impact of Work Schedules on the Family (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research).
46. Thompson, E. P. (1976), The Making of the English Working Class (London: Gollancz).
47. Thrift, N. (1983), ‘On the Determination of Social Action in Space and Time’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1: 23–57.
48. Tipps, J. W. (2003), ‘A Preliminary Study of Factors that Limited Secondary School Choral Involvement of Collegiate Choral Singers’, International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, (1): 22–8.
49. Warrener, J. J. (1985), ‘Making Junior–Senior Band Succeed’, Music Educators Journal, 72 (2): 42–4.
50. White, L., and Keith, B. (1990), ‘The Effect of Shift Work on the Quality and Stability of Marital Relations’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52: 453–62.
51. Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York: Free Press).
52. Winship, C. (1978), ‘The Allocation of Time Among Individuals’, Sociological Methodology, 9: 75–99.
53. Winship, C. (1992), ‘Social Relations and Time’, paper presented at the Sunbelt Social Network Conference, San Diego, Calif., 14–16 February.
54. Zerubavel, E. (1981), Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life (Chicago, III.: University of Chicago Press).
55. Zerubavel, E. (1982), ‘The Standardization of Time: A Sociohistorical Perspective’, American Journal of Sociology, 88: 1–23.