Quantifying the climate change effects of bioenergy systems: Comparison of 15 impact assessment methods

GCB Bioenergy

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 727-743

  Brandão, Miguel ^a,b   Kirschbaum, Miko U F ^c   Cowie, Annette L ^a,d   Hjuler, Susanne Vedel ^e,f  

^a International Energy Agency   (Sweden)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^d NSW DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^e Independent Researcher   (Denmark)

^f COWI A/S ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON; CROPS; FORESTRY;

AGRICULTURAL BIOENERGY; BIO-ENERGY SYSTEMS; CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY USE; SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION; TIME PREFERENCES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIOENERGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTIMATION METHOD; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 85060573919     PISSN: 17571693     EISSN: 17571707     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12593     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Allen, M. R., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Shine, K. P., Reisinger, A., Pierrehumbert, R. T., & Forster, P. M. (2016). New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nature Climate Change, 6, 773–776. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2998
2. Brandão, M. (2012). Food, Feed, Fuel, Timber or Carbon Sink? Towards Sustainable Land Use: a consequential life cycle approach. PhD thesis. Surrey, UK: Centre for Environmental Strategy (Division of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering), Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey. 246 pp + Appendices 541 pp.
3. Brandão, M., & CowieA. (2015). Do methodological choices really matter in the life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems? 2nd Discussion Forum on Industrial Ecology and Life-Cycle Management, March 5–6. Coimbra, Portugal: University of Coimbra.
4. Brandão, M., Levasseur, A., Kirschbaum, M. U., Weidema, B. P., Cowie, A. L., Jørgensen, S. V., … Chomkhamsri, K. (2013). Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0451-6
5. Breton, C., Blanchet, P., Amor, B., Beauregard, R., & Chang, W. S. (2018). Assessing the climate change impacts of biogenic carbon in buildings: A critical review of two main dynamic approaches. Sustainability, 10(6), 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062020
6. Bruckner, T., Bashmakov, I. A., Mulugetta, Y., Chum, H., De la Vega Navarro, A., Edmonds, J., … Honnery, D. (2014). Energy systems. Chapter 7 of the WGIII 5th IPCC Assessment Report (pp. 511–597). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
7. BSI. (2008). PAS 2050: 2008 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London, UK: British Standards Institute.
8. Cherubini, F., Bird, N. D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B., & Woess-Gallasch, S. (2009). Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 53, 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013
9. Cherubini, F., & Bright, R. M., Stromman, A. H. (2012). Site-specific global warming potentials of biogenic CO2 for bioenergy: contributions from carbon fluxes and albedo dynamics. Environmental Research Letters, 7, Article #045902.
10. 2 emission metrics for forest bioenergy. Scientific Reports, 6, Article #20186.
11. 2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: Atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 3, 413–426.
12. 2 emissions from bioenergy. Ecological Modelling, 223, 59–66.
13. Cherubini, F., Fuglestvedt, J., Gasser, T., Reisinger, A., Cavalett, O., Huijbregts, M. A., … Strømman, A. H. (2016). Bridging the gap between impact assessment methods and climate science. Environmental Science & Policy, 64, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.019
14. Chum, H., Faaij, A., Moreira, J., & Junginger, H. M. (2011). Bioenergy. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, & C. von Stechow (Eds.), IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation (pp. 259–268). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clift, R., & Brandão, M. (2008). Carbon storage and timing of emissions – a note by Roland Clift and Miguel Brandao. Centre for Environmental Strategy. Working Paper 2(08).
16. Cowie, A. L., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., & Ward, M. (2007). Options for including all lands in a future greenhouse gas accounting framework. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.03.003
17. Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N. H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., … Fargione, J. (2015). Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: An assessment. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 7, 916–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12205
18. Davis, S. C., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., & DeLucia, E. H. (2009). Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels. Trends in Plant Science, 14, 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.12.006
19. De Rosa, M., Pizzol, M., & Schmidt, J. (2018). How methodological choices affect LCA climate impact results: The case of structural timber. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1312-0
20. European Commission. (2010). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
21. Fearnside, P. M., Lashof, D. A., & Moura-Costa, P. (2000). Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 5, 239–270.
22. Frischknecht, R., & Jolliet, O., (2016). Global guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators. Publication of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris, DTI/2081/PA, ISBN, pp. 978–992.
23. Frischknecht, R., Fantke, P., Tschümperlin, L., Niero, M., Antón, A., Bare, J.,.. Levasseur, A. (2016). Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(3), 429–442.
24. Fuglestvedt, J. S., Berntsen, T. K., Godal, O., Sausen, R., Shine, K. P., & Skodvin, T. (2003). Metrics of climate change: Assessing radiative forcing and emission indices. Climatic Change, 58, 267–331.
25. Guest, G., Cherubini, F., & Stromman, A. H. (2013a). The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 5, 459–466.
26. Guest, G., Cherubini, F., & Stromman, A. H. (2013b). Global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from biomass stored in the anthroposphere and used for bioenergy at end of life. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17, 20–30.
27. Hare, B., & Meinshausen, M. (2005). How much warming are we committed to and how much can be avoided? Climatic Change, 75, 111–149.
28. Helin, T., Sokka, L., Soimakallio, S., Pingoud, K., & Pajula, T. (2013). Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 5, 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12016
29. IEA. (2017). Key world energy statistics. Paris, France: International Energy Agency.
30. Ioelovich, M. (2015). Recent findings and the energetic potential of plant biomass as a renewable source of biofuels – A review. BioResources, 10, 1879–1914.
31. IPCC. (2000). Land use, land-use change and forestry. In R. T. Watson, I. R. Noble, & B. Bolin, et al. (Eds.), A Special Report by the IPCC. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. IPCC. (2014) Summary for Policymakers. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, & Y. Sokona, et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
33. ISO. (2013). ISO/TS 14067:2013 Greenhouse gases – C footprint of products – Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
34. Jolliet, O., Antón, A., Boulay, A.-M., Cherubini, F., Fantke, P., Levasseur, A., … Frischknecht, R. (2018). Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: Impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1443-y.
35. Joos, F., Roth, R., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Peters, G. P., Enting, I. G., Bloh, W. V., … Friedrich, T. (2013). Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics: A multi-model analysis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 2793–2825. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2793-2013
36. Jørgensen, S. V., Hauschild, M. Z., & Nielsen, P. H. (2014). Assessment of urgent impacts of greenhouse gas emissions-the climate tipping potential (CTP). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0693-y
37. Jørgensen, S. V., Hauschild, M. Z., & Nielsen, P. H. (2015). The potential contribution to climate change mitigation from temporary carbon storage in biomaterials. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0845-3
38. Kendall, A. (2012). Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0436-5
39. Kendall, A., Chang, B., & Sharpe, B. (2009). Accounting for time-dependent effects in biofuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions calculations. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 7142–7147. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900529u
40. Kendall, A., & Yuan, J. (2013). Comparing life cycle assessments of different biofuel options. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 17, 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.02.020
41. Kendall, A. (2012). Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(8), 1042–1049.
42. Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (2003). Can trees buy time? An assessment of the role of vegetation sinks as part of the global carbon cycle. Climatic Change, 58, 47–71.
43. Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (2014). Climate-change impact potentials as an alternative to global warming potentials. Environmental Research Letters, 9(3), 034014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034014.
44. Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (2017). Assessing the merits of bioenergy by estimation marginal climate-change impacts. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22, 841–852.
45. Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Schlamadinger, B., Cannell, M. G. R., Hamburg, S. P., Karjalainen, T., Kurz, W. A., … Singh, T. P. (2001). A generalised approach of accounting for biospheric carbon stock changes under the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Science and Policy, 4, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00018-1
46. Koponen, K., Soimakallio, S., Kline, K. L., Cowie, A., & Brandao, M. (2018). Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy - Choice of reference system. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2271–2280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.292
47. Lamers, P., & Junginger, M. (2013). The 'debt' is in the detail: A synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining, 7, 373–385.
48. Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J. W., Lucht, W., Rahmstorf, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1786–1793. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705414105
49. Levasseur, A., et al. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts. Global Guidance for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicators - Volume 1R Frischknecht and O Jolliet. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Chapter 3, 59–75.
50. Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., Brandão, M., & Samson, R. (2012). Assessing temporary carbon sequestration and storage projects through land use, land-use change and forestry: Comparison of dynamic life cycle assessment with ton-year approaches. Climatic Change, 115, 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0473-x
51. Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., Deschênes, L., & Samson, R. (2010). Considering time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 3169–3174. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9030003
52. Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., & Samson, R. (2013). Biogenic carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00503.x
53. Levasseur, A., Cavalett, O., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Gasser, T., Johansson, D. J., Jørgensen, S. V., … Tanaka, K. (2016). Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: Review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA. Ecological Indicators, 71, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.049
54. Marchal, V., Dellink, R., van Vuren, D., Clapp, C., & Château, J., Magné, B., … vanVliet, J. (2012). Climate change. In OECD (Ed.), OECD environmental outlook to 2050: the consequences of inaction (pp. 71–152). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
55. 2 avoided emissions and sequestration – Description and applications in forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 5, 51–60.
56. Müller-Wenk, R., & Brandão, M. (2010). Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0144-y
57. Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F. M., et al. (2013). Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, & G.-K. Plattner et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 659–740). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58. Noble, I., Apps, M., Houghton, R., et al. (2000). Implications of different definitions and generic issues. In R. T. Watson, I. Noble, B. Bolin, N. H. Ravindranath, D. J. Verardo, & D. J. Dokken (Eds.), Land use, land-use change and forestry (pp. 52–126). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 686–702.
60. O'Hare, M., Plevin, R. J., Martin, J. I., Jones, A. D., Kendall, A., & Hopson, E. (2009). Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels' greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum. Environmental Research Letters, 4, 024001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024001
61. Pingoud, K., Ekholm, T., Helin, S. S., & T,, (2016). Carbon balance indicator for forest bioenergy scenarios. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 8, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12253
62. Plattner, G. K., Stocker, P., Midgley, P., & Tignor, M. (2009). IPCC expert meeting on the science of alternative metrics. IPPC. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/supporting-material/expert-meeting-metrics-oslo.pdf
63. Repo, A., Tuomi, M., & Liski, J. (2011). Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 3, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01065.x
64. Røyne, F., Peñaloza, D., Sandin, G., Berlin, J., & Svanström, M. (2016). Climate impact assessment in life cycle assessments of forest products: Implications of method choice for results and decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.009
65. Schlamadinger, B., & Marland, G. (1996). The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Bioenergy, 10, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00113-1
66. Schlamadinger, B., Spitzer, J., Kohlmaier, G. H., & Lüdeke, M. (1995). Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass & Bioenergy, 8, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00020-8
67. Schneider, S. H., Semenov, S., Patwardhan, A., Burton, I., Magadza, C., Oppenheimer, M., … Sukumar, R. (2007). Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van derLinden, & S. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 779–810). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Shine, K. P., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Hailemariam, K., & Stuber, N. (2005). Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Climatic Change, 68, 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-1146-9
69. Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70. Sterner, T., & Persson, U. M. (2008). An even sterner review: Introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Review of Environmental Economic Policy, 2, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem024
71. Tanaka, K., Peters, G. P., & Fuglestvedt, J. S. (2010). Policy update: Multicomponent climate policy: Why do emission metrics matter? Carbon Management, 1, 191–197.
72. Zanchi, G., Pena, N., & Bird, N. (2012). Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 4, 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01149.x