Barriers and solutions for early career researchers in tackling the reproducibility crisis in cognitive neuroscience

Cortex

Volumn 113, Issue , 2019, Pages 357-359

  Maizey, Leah ^a   Tzavella, Loukia ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREER; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PUBLICATION; REPLICATION STUDY; SCIENTIST; NEUROSCIENCE; PERSONNEL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; HUMANS; NEUROSCIENCES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 85060090728     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.015     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Allen, C., Mehler, M.A., Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. 2018, November 1 Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/3czyt/.
2. Carp, J., On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of fmri experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience 6 (2012), 1–13 http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149.
3. Chambers, C.D., Reproducibility meets accountability: Introducing the replications initiatives at royal society open science. [Blog post]. 2018, October 15 Retrieved from: https://blogs.royalsociety.org/publishing/reproducibility-meets-accountability/.
4. Everett, J.A.C., Earp, B.D., A tragedy of the (academic) commons: Interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1152 (2015), 1–4 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01152.
5. Huber, D.E., Potter, K.W., Huszar, L.D., Less “Story” and more “Reliability” in cognitive neuroscience. Cortex 113 (2019), 347–349.
6. Kramer, B., Bosman, J., Open science practices (version 1). Figshare. Collection. 2017 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3685048.v1.
7. McIntosh, R.D., Exploratory reports: A new type of cortex. Cortex 96 (2017), A1–A4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.014.
8. Morey, C.C., Tzavella, L., Going for a registered report? [Blog post]., 2018, August 17 Retrieved from https://candicemorey.org/?p=265.
9. Munafò, M.R., Nosek, B.A., Bishop, D.V.M., Button, K.S., Chambers, C.D., Percie du Sert, N., et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour 1:0021 (2017), 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
10. Rosenthal, R., The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 1979 838-641 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.
11. Smolčić, V.Š., Salami publication: Definitions and examples. Biochemia Medica 23:3 (2013), 237–241, 10.11613/BM.2013.030.