Intra-and inter-model reliability of Hemocue Hb 201+ and HemoCue Hb 301 devices

Asian Journal of Transfusion Science

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 123-126

  Jain, Ashish ^a   Chowdhury, Nilotpal ^b   Jain, Sanchit ^b  

^a HIMALAYAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Anemia; hemoglobin; method comparison; point of care testing; reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059462710     PISSN: 09736247     EISSN: 19983565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_119_17     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cohen AR, Seidl-Friedman J. HemoCue system for hemoglobin measurement. Evaluation in anemic and nonanemic children. Am J Clin Pathol 1988;90:302-5.
2. Morris LD, Osei-Bimpong A, McKeown D, Roper D, Lewis SM. Evaluation of the utility of the HemoCue 301 haemoglobinometer for blood donor screening. Vox Sang 2007;93:64-9.
3. Tondon R, Verma A, Pandey P, Chaudhary R. Quality evaluation of four hemoglobin screening methods in a blood donor setting along with their comparative cost analysis in an Indian scenario. Asian J Transfus Sci 2009;3:66-9.
4. Sanchis-Gomar F, Cortell-Ballester J, Pareja-Galeano H, Banfi G, Lippi G. Hemoglobin point-of-care testing: The HemoCue system. J Lab Autom 2013;18:198-205.
5. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.
6. Carrasco JL, King TS, Chinchilli VM. The concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures estimated by variance components. J Biopharm Stat 2009;19:90-105.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
8. Zou GY. Confidence interval estimation for the Bland-Altman limits of agreement with multiple observations per individual. Stat Methods Med Res 2013;22:630-42.
9. NCSS 11 Statistical Software. Kaysville, Utah, USA: NCSS, LLC; 2016.
10. Carrasco JL, Martinez JP. Concordance correlation coefficient for repeated (and Non-Repeated) measures. R package version 1.2.1. 2015. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cccrm. [Last accessed on 2018 May 28].
11. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2016. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/. [Last accessed on 2018 May 28].
12. Muñoz M, Romero A, Gómez JF, Manteca A, Naveira E, Ramírez G, et al. Utility of point-of-care haemoglobin measurement in the HemoCue-B haemoglobin for the initial diagnosis of anaemia. Clin Lab Haematol 2005;27:99-104.
13. Bahadur S, Jain S, Jain M. Estimation of hemoglobin in blood donors: A comparative study using hemocue and cell counter. Transfus Apher Sci 2010;43:155-7.
14. Rappaport AI, Karakochuk CD, Whitfield KC, Kheang KM, Green TJ. A method comparison study between two hemoglobinometer models (Hemocue hb 301 and hb 201+) to measure hemoglobin concentrations and estimate anemia prevalence among women in Preah Vihear, Cambodia. Int J Lab Hematol 2017;39:95-100.
15. Watson PF, Petrie A. Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology. Theriogenology 2010;73:1167-79.
16. Jain A, Chowdhury N. Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement. Asian J Transfus Sci 2018. [In this issue]. [Doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_93_17].