The Effects of an Online Data-Based Decisions Professional Development for In-service Teachers of Students with Significant Disability

Rural Special Education Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 30-40

  Jimenez, Bree A ^a   Mims, Pamela J ^b   Baker, Josh ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Water Resources Management Program and Department of Geoscience   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059304943     PISSN: 87568705     EISSN: 21688605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/875687051603500305     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Belfiore, P. J., & Browder, D. M. (1992). The effects of self-monitoring on teachers’ data-based decisions and on the progress of adults with severe mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 60-67.
2. Berry, A. B., Petrin, R. A., Gravelle, M. L., & Farmer, T. W. (2012). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30, 3-11.
3. Branford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Browder, D. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and significant disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.
5. Browder, D. M., Demchak, M., Heller, M., & King, D. (1989). An in vivo evaluation of the use of data-based rules to guide instructional decisions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 234-240.
6. Browder, D. M., Liberty, K., Heller, M., & D’Huyvetters, K. K., (1986). Self-management by teachers: Improving instructional decision making. Professional School Psychology, 1, 165-175.
7. Browder, D. M., & Spooner, F. (2014). More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities. New York: Brooks.
8. Browder, D., Spooner, F., & Jimenez, B. (2011). Standards-based individualized education plans and progress monitoring (pp. 42-91). In D. Browder, & F. Spooner (Eds.). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York, NY, Guilford Press.
9. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Hudson, M. (2010). Utilization of formative assessments within educational programs for students with significant cognitive disabilities: current practice, current research, and next steps. Chief State School Officers: ASES-SCASS on Alternate Assessment.
10. Collins, B. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
11. Erickson, A. S., Noonan, P. M., & McCall, Z. (2012). Effectiveness of professional development for rural special educators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31, 22-32.
12. Farlow, L. J., & Snell, M. E., (1989). Teachers use of student performance data to make instructional decisions: Practice in programs for students with moderate to profound disabilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 13-22.
13. Goertz, M. E., Barnes, C., & Massell, D. (August, 2013). How state education agencies acquire and use research in school improvement strategies. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from www.cpre.org/SEA
14. Grigg, N. C., Snell, M. E., & Lloyd, B. H. (1989). Visual analysis of student evaluation data: A qualitative analysis of teacher decision-making. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 109-127.
15. Jimenez, B. A., Mims, P. J., & Browder, D. M. (2012). Data-based decisions guidelines for teachers of students with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 407-413.
16. National Center on Student Progress Monitoring (NCSPM), U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2008). Retrieved from http://www.studentprogress. org/default.asp
17. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
18. Quality Matters Rubric Standards (2013). Retrieved from http://www.qualitymatters.org/layout-1/download/QM standards 2011-2013.pdf
19. Spooner, F. Dymond, S. K., Smith, A., & Kennedy, C. H. (2006). What we know and need to know about accessing the general curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 53, 411-420.
20. Sundeen, T. H., & Weinke, W. D. (2009). A model for recruiting and preparing new rural special educators: Mining an untapped potential. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28, 3-10.
21. Suppo, J. L., & Mayton, M. R. (2014). Expanding training opportunities for parents of children with autism. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 33, 19-28.
22. Utley, B. L., Zigmond, N., & Strain, P. S. (1987). How various forms of data affect teacher analysis of student performance. Exceptional Children, 53, 411-422.
23. Wakeman, S. (2010a). Data-based decisions. Modules Addressing Special Education and Teacher Education (MAST). Greenville, NC: East Carolina University. Available http://mast.ecu.edu/modules/dbd/http://mast.ecu.edu/modules/dbd/
24. Wakeman, S. (2010b). Data collection: An introduction. Modules Addressing Special Education and Teacher Education (MAST). Greenville, NC: East Carolina University. Retrieved from http://mast.ecu.edu/modules/dc_intro/
25. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answer Report, REL 2007-No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs