Collective memory and the nineteenth amendment: Reasoning about “the woman question” in the discourse of sex discrimination

History, Memory, and the Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 131-182

  Siegel, Reva B ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059288527     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Susan A. Crane, “Writing the Individual Back into Collective Memory,” American Historical Review 20 (1997): 1372
2. Natalie Zemon Davis and Randolph Starn, eds., “Memory and Counter Memory,” special issue of Representations 26 (1989)
3. Iwona Irwin-Zarecka, Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1994)
4. J. M. Balkin, Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), 203-15.
5. Michael G. Kammen, A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture (New York: Knopf, 1986).
6. Reva B. Siegel, “Why Equal Protection No Longer Protects: The Evolving Forms of Status-Enforcing State Action,” Stanford Law Review 49 (1997): 1142.
7. Reva B. Siegel, “Home as Work: The First Woman’s Rights Claims Concerning Wives’ Household Labor, 1850-1880,” Yale Law Journal 103 (1994): 1073.
8. Robert H. Bork, Slouching towards Gomorrah (New York: Regan Books, 1996), 195.
9. “A Wife’s Protest,” Woman’s Journal, March 6,1875, 74.
10. Robert Steinfeld, “Property and Suffrage in the Early American Republic” Stanford Law Review 41 (1989): 335.
11. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Julian Boyd et al., 60 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950), 1:503-5
12. Joan R. Gundersen, “Independence, Citizenship, and the American Revolution,” Signs 13 (1987): 64.
13. The Works of John Adams, ed. C. Adams (1864), 9:376-77
14. Toby L. Ditz, “Ownership and Obligation: Inheritance and Patriarchal Households in Connecticut, 1750-1820,” William and Mary Quarterly 47 (1990): 236-37
15. Nancy Fraser and Linda Gordon, " A Genealogy of Dependence: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State,” Signs 19 (1994): 13
16. Christopher Tomlins, “Subordination, Authority, Law: Subjects in Labor History,” International Labor and Working-Class Historian 47 (1995): 70.
17. Norma Basch, In the Eyes of the Law: Women, Marriage, and Property in Nineteenth-Century New York (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982), 47-55, 70-112.
18. Judith N. Shklar, American Citizenship (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991), 2, 27-28.
19. Jacob Katz Cogan, “The Look Within: Property, Capacity, and Suffrage in Nineteenth-Century America,” Yale Law Journal 107 (1997): 473.
20. Eleanor Flexner, Century of Struggle: The Woman’s Rights Movement in the United States (Cambridge: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, 1959), 41-52,181-86.
21. Paula Baker, “The Domestication of Politics,” American Historical Review 89 (1984): 634
22. Lori D. Ginzberg, Women and-the Work of Benevolence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990): 91-97.
23. “Declaration of Sentiments” in History of Woman Suffrage, ed. Elizabeth Cady Stanton et al. (Salem, N. H.: Ayer, 1985), 1:70-73
24. Linda K. Kerber, “From the Declaration of Independence to the Declaration of Sentiments: The Legal Status of Women in the Early Republic, 1776-1848,” Human Rights 6 (1977): 115.
25. Ellen Carol DuBois, Feminism and Suffrage (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978), 55-66.
26. Jill E. Hasday, “Federalism and the Family Reconstructed,” University of California Law Review 451 (1998).
27. Patricia Lucie, " O n Being a Free Person and a Citizen by Constitutional Amendment,” Journal of American Studies 12 (1978): 350
28. Nina Morais, “Sex Discrimination and the Fourteenth Amendment: Lost History,” Yale Law Journal 97 (1988): 1157 and n. 21
29. Amy Dru Stanley, “Conjugal Bonds and Wage Labor: Rights of Contract in the Age of Emancipation,” Journal of American History 75 (1988): 480.
30. Ellen Carol DuBois, “Outgrowing the Compact of the Fathers: Equal Rights, Woman Suffrage, and the United States Constitution, 1820-1878,” Journal of American History 74 (1987): 836-52
31. Joellen Lind, “Dominance and Democracy: The Legacy of Woman Suffrage for the Voting Right,” IZ.C.L.A Women’s Law Journal 5 (1994): 154-67.
32. Rowland Berthoff, “Conventional Mentality: Free Blacks, Women, and Business Corporations as Unequal Persons, 1820-1870,” Journal of American History 76 (1989): 757
33. Nancy F. Cott, “Marriage and Women’s Citizenship in the United States, 1830-1934,” American Historical Review 103 (1998): 1440, 1452
34. The Ideas of the Woman Suffrage Movement, 1890-1920 (New York: Norton, 1981), 15.
35. Horace Bushnell, Women’s Suffrage: The Reform against Nature (New York: Charles Scribner, 1869), 52, 53, 54.
36. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, “The Solitude of Self (1892),” reprinted in Beth M. Waggenspack, The Search for Self-Sovereignty (New York: Greenwood Press, 1989), 159-60
37. “Declaration of Sentiments” in Stanton et al., History of Woman Suffrage, 1:70-73
38. Reva B. Siegel, " ‘The Rule of Love’: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy,” Yale Law Journal 105 (1996): 2117.
39. Jane E. Larson, " ‘Even a Worm Will Turn at Last’: Rape Reform in Late Nineteenth-Century America,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 9 (1997): 8-10.
40. Deborah Rhode, Justice and Gender (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989), 48-50.
41. Stanton et al., History of Woman Suffrage, 1:597-98 (1881)
42. Ellen Carol DuBois, Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Winning of Woman Suffrage (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), 94-106.
43. George Stewart Brown, “The Amending Clause Was Provided for Changing, Limiting, Shifting, or Delegating Towers of Government.’ It Was Not Provided for Amending ‘the People.’ The 19th Amendment Is Therefore Ultra Vires,” Virginia Law Review 8 (1922): 237.
44. Frank Michelman, “Saving O l d Glory: O n Constitutional Iconography,” Stanford Law Review 42 (1990): 1344 n. 24.
45. Robert Post, “Theories of Constitutional Interpretation,” Representations 30 (1990): 21-23.
46. Reva B. Siegel, “Reasoning from the Body: A Historical Perspective on Abortion Regulation and Questions of Equal Protection,” Stanford Law Review 44 (1992): 323.
47. Joan Zimmerman, “The Jurisprudence of Equality: The Women’s Minimum Wage, the First Equal Rights Amendment, and Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 1905-1923,” Journal of American History 78 (1991): 188
48. Sophonisba P. Breckinridge, Marriage and the Civic Rights of Women: Separate Domicile and Independent Citizenship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931), 4-5.
49. Virginia Sapiro, “Women, Citizenship, and Nationality: Immigration and Naturalization Policies in the United States,” Politics and Society 13 (1984): 1,12-13.
50. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1768; reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), 3:362.
51. Akhil Reed Amar, “Women and the Constitution,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 18 (1994): 471-72
52. “The Bill of Rights as a Constitution,” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 1202-3
53. Vikram David Amar, “Jury Service as Political Participation Akin to Voting,” Cornell Law Review 80 (1995): 241-42.
54. Jennifer K. Brown, “The Nineteenth Amendment and Women’s Equality,” Yale Law Journal 102 (1993): 2175
55. Gretchen Ritter, " A Jury of Her Peers: Citizenship and Women’s Jury Service after the Nineteenth Amendment,” typescript, May 1997.
56. Sylvia A. Law, “Rethinking Sex and the Constitution,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132 (1984): 970-73 and n. 55
57. W. William Hodes, “Women and the Constitution: Some Legal History and a New Approach to the Nineteenth Amendment,” Rutgers Law Review 25 (1970): 51 n. 101.
58. Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Transformations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998)
59. Bruce Ackerman, “Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law,” Yale Law Journal 99 (1989): 515-47.
60. William E. Nelson, The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988), 163
61. Mark G. Yudof, “Equal Protection, Class Legislation, and Sex Discrimination: One Small Cheer for Mr. Herbert Spencer’s Social Statics,” Michigan Law Review 88 (1990): 1387-89, 1396-97
62. David Cole, “Strategies of Difference: Litigating for Women’s Rights in a Man’s World,” Law and Inequity Journal 2 (1984): 54-58.
63. Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256, 280-81 (1979).
64. David A. Strauss, “Discriminatory Intent and the Taming of Brown,” University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989): 935
65. Daniel J. McMullen and Irene Hirata McMullen, “Stubborn Facts of History-the Vestiges of Past Discrimination in School Desegregation Cases,” Case Western Law Review 44 (1993): 75.
66. Cass R. Sunstein, “Homosexuality and the Constitution,” Indiana Law Journal 70 (1994): 1.
67. Vicki Schultz, ‘Telling Stories about Women and Work: Judicial Interpretations of Sex Segregation in the Workplace in Title VII Cases Raising the Lack of Interest Argument,” Harvard Law Review 103 (1990): 1749.