Arend lijphart and the new institutionalism

Democracy and Institutions: The Life Work of Arend Lijphart

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 43-73

  Grofman, Bernard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059252755     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Brams, Steven J. 1984. “Are The Two Houses of Congress Really Co-Equal?” In B. Grofman and D. Wittman, eds., The Federalist Papers and The New Institutionalism. New York: Agathon Press.
2. Brennan, Geoffrey, and James M. Buchanan. 1985. The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
3. Buchanan, James, and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Carey, John. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
5. Crawford, Sue E. S. and Elinor Ostrom. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review, 89, No. 3: 582-600.
6. Crepaz, Markus. 1996. “Constitutional Structures and Regime Performance in 18 Industrialized Democracies-A Test Of Olson’s Hypothesis.” European Journal of Political Research, 29, No. 1 (January): 87-104.
7. Crepaz, Markus. 1996. “Consensus Versus Majoritarian Democracy-Political Institutions and Their Impact on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes.” Comparative Political Studies, 29 (February): 4-26.
8. Crepaz, Markus and Arend Lijphart. 1995. “Linking and Integrating Corporatism And Consensus Democracy-Theory, Concepts And Evidence.” British Journal Of Political Science, 25 (April): 281-88.
9. Crepaz Markus. 1994. “From Semisovereignty To Sovereignty-The Decline of Corporatism and Rise of Parliament in Austria.” Comparative Politics, 27, No. 1 (October): 45-65.
10. Crepaz, Markus. 1992. “Corporatism in Decline-An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Corporatism on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes in 18 Industrialized Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies, 25, No. 2 (July): 139-68.
11. Crepaz, Markus. 1990. “The Impact of Party Polarization and Postmaterialism on Voter Turnout-A Comparative Study of 16 Industrial Democracies.” European Journal Of Political Research, 18, No. 2 (March): 183-205.
12. Dalton, Russell. 1996. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 2nd Edition. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
13. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
14. Easton, David. 1966. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
15. Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, eds., Political Science: Scope and Theory (Handbook of Political Science, Volume I). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (reprinted in Eckstein. 1992, 117-78).
16. Eckstein, Harry. 1988. “A Cultural Theory of Political Change.” In American Political Science Review, 82 (3) (September).
17. Eckstein, Harry. 1992. Regarding Politics: Essays on Political Theory, Stability and Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Engstrom, Richard L., and Michael D. McDonald. 1981. “The Election of Blacks to City Councils: Clarifying the Impact of Electoral Arrangements on the Seats/Population Relationship.” American Political Science Review, 75: 344-54.
19. Engstrom, Richard L., and Michael D. McDonald. 1982. “The Undenepresentation of Blacks on City Councils: Comparing the Structural and Socioeconomic Explanations for South/Non-South Differences.” Journal of Politics, 44: 1088-99.
20. Feld, Scott L. and Bernard Grofman. 1986. “On the Possibility of Faithfully Representative Committees.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 80, No. 3, 863-79.
21. Grofman, Bernard. 1988. “Representation in the "Calculus Of Consent.” Prepared for delivery at the “Liberty Fund Conference on The Calculus of Consent.” Santa Cruz, California, June 23-25.
22. Grofman, Bernard. 1989. “Introduction: The ‘Federalist Papers, and the New Institutionalism.” In Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman, eds., The ‘Federalist Papers’ and the New Institutionalism. New York: Agathon Press.
23. Grofman, Bernard. 1993a. “Public Choice, Civic Republicanism, and American Politics: Perspectives of a ‘Reasonable Choice’ Modeler.” Texas Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 7 (June), 1541-87.
24. Grofman, Bernard, ed. 1993b. Information, Participation, and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1-13.
25. Grofman, Bernard. 1993c. “On the Gentle Art of Rational Choice Bashing.” In Bernard Grofman, ed. Information, Participation, and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 239-42.
26. Grofman, Bernard. 1996a. “Downsian Political Economy.” In Robert Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, eds., New Handbook of Political Science. New York and London: Oxford University Press.
27. Grofman, Bernard, ed. 1996b. Term Limits: Public Choice Perspectives. Holland: Kluwer.
28. Grofman, Bernard. 1997. “Seven Durable Axes of Cleavage in Political Science.” In Kristen Monroe, ed., Contemporary Empirical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Grofman, Bernard. 1999a, “Preface: Methodological Steps toward the Study of Embedded Institutions.” In Bernard Grofman, Sung-Chull Lee, Edwin A. Winckler, and Brian Woodall, eds. Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non - Transfe rabie Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30. Grofman, Bernard. 1999b. “SNTV, STV, and Single Member District Systems: Theoretical Comparisons and Contrasts.” In Bernard Grofman, Sung-Chull Lee, Edwin Winckler, and Brian Woodall, eds., Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31. Grofman, Bernard. 1999c. “SNTV: An inventory of theoretically derived propositions and a brief review of the evidence from Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Alabama.” In Bernard Grofman, Sung-Chull Lee, Edwin Winckler, and Brian Woodall, eds., Elections in Japan, Korea and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32. Grofman, Bernard and Chandler Davidson. 1994. “The Effect of Municipal Election Structure on Black Representation in Eight Southern States.” In Davidson, Chandler and Bernard Grofman, eds., Quiet Revolution in the South: The Impact of the Voting Rights Act, 1965-1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. Grofman, Bernard, Robert Griffin, and Gregory Berry. 1995. “House Members Who Become Senators: Learning From a 'Natural Experiment, in Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20 (4) (November): 513-29.
34. Grofman, Bernard, Robert Griffin, and Amihai Glazer. 1990. “Identical geography, different party: A natural experiment on the magnitude of party differences in the U.S. Senate, 1960-84.” In Johnston, R.J., F.M. Shelley and P.J. Taylor, eds., Developments in Electoral Geography. London: Routledge, 207-17.
35. Grofman, Bernard and Arend Lijphart, eds. 1986. Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.
36. Grofman, Bernard, Arend Lijphart, Robert McKay, and Howard Scarrow, eds. 1982. Representation and Redistricting Issues. Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.
37. Grofman, Bernard, Michael Migalski, and Nicholas Noviello. 1986. “Effects of Multimember Districts on Black Representation in State Legislatures.” Review of Black Political Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Spring), 65-78.
38. Grofman, Bernard and Andrew Reynolds. 1996. “Modeling the Drop-off Between Minority Population Share and the Size of the Minority Electorate in Situations of Differential Voter Eligibility Across Groups.” Electoral Studies, 15 No. 2 (May): 255-61.
39. Grofman, Bernard and Donald Wittman, eds. 1989. The 'Federalist Papers, and the New Institutionalism. New York: Agathon Press.
40. Guinier, Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority. New York: Harper.
41. Hammond, Thomas H. and Gary J. Miller. 1987. “The Core of the Constitution.” American Political Science Review, 81:1155-74.
42. Heilig, Patty and Robert J. Mundt. 1981. “Do Districts Make a Difference?” Urban Interest (April) 62-75.
43. Karnig, Albert K. and Susan Welch. 1979. “Sex and Ethnicity in Municipal Representation.” Social Science Quarterly (December) 69(3).
44. Keech, William R. 1986. “Thinking about the Length and Renewability of Electoral Terms.” In Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart, eds., Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.
45. Koelble, Thomas A. 1995. “Review Article: The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology.” Comparative Politics (January): 231-43.
46. Langlois, Richard N. 1986. “The New Institutional Economics: An Introductory Essay.” In R. N. Langlois, ed., Economics as a Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-39.
47. Lengle, James I. 1981. Representation and Presidential Primaries: The Democratic Party in the Post-Reform Era. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
48. Levi, Margaret. 1987. “Theories of Historical and Institutional Change.” PS (Summer): 684-88.
49. Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50. Lijphart, Arend. 1975. Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2nd edition.
51. Lijphart, Arend. 1977a. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
52. Lijphart, Arend. 1977b. “Thresholds and Payoffs in List Systems of Proportional Representation,” European Journal of Political Research.
53. Lijphart, Arend. 1982. “Comparative Perspective on Fair Representation: The Plurality-Majority Rule, Geographical Districting, and Alternative Electoral Arrangements.” In Grofman, Bernard, Arend Lijphart, Robert McKay and Howard Sc arrow, eds., Representation and Redistricting Issues. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 143-60.
54. Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
55. Lijphart, Arend, ed. 1992. Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. New York and London: Oxford University Press.
57. Lijphart, Arend and Markus Crepaz. 1991. “Corporatism And Consensus Democracy in 18 Countries-Conceptual and Empirical Linkages.” British Journal of Political Science, 21 (April): 235-46.
58. Lijphart, Arend and Bernard Grofman, eds. 1984. Choosing an Electoral System. New York: Praeger.
59. Lijphart, Arend and Bernard Grofman. 2001, forthcoming. The United States in Comparative Perspective. Book manuscript in very slow progress.
60. Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. 1961. The Federalist Papers. New York: The New American Library (originally published 1787).
61. March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review, 78: 734-49.
62. March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
63. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1987. “The ‘New Science of Politics’ and the Old Art of Government.” Public Interest, 86 (Winter): 22-35.
64. Myerson, Roger B. 1993. “Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption: A Game Theoretic Analysis.” Games and Economic Behavior, 5: 118-32.
65. Niemi, Richard, Jeffrey Hill, and Bernard Grofman. 1985. “The Impact of Multimember Districts on Party Representation in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 4, 441-55.
66. North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W.W. Norton.
67. North, Douglass. 1986. “The New Institutional Economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (March).
68. Ordeshook, Peter C. 1987. “The Reintegration of Political Science and Economics and the Presumed Imperialism of Economic Theory.” Social Sciences Working Paper 655 (September), California Institute of Technology.
69. Ostrom, Elinor. 1986. “An Agenda for the Study of Institutions.” Public Choice, 48: 3-25.
70. Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Powell, Walter W. and Paul DiMaggio, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Rae, Douglas W. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (1st Edition, 1967).
73. Ranney, Austin. 1976. “The Divine Science: Political Engineering in American Culture.” American Political Science Review, 70: 140-48.
74. Reynolds, Andrew. 1993. Voting for a New South Africa. Capetown: Maskew Miller Longman.
75. Reynolds, Andrew, ed. 1994. Election 794 South Africa: The Campaigns, Results and Future Prospects. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
76. Reynolds, Andrew. 1995. “The Case For Proportionality.” Journal of Democracy, 6 (October): 117-24.
77. Reynolds, Andrew. 1996. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, August.
78. Schotter, Andrew. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Schotter, Andrew. 1986. “The Evolution of Rules.” In Richard N. Langlois, ed., Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. London and New York: Cambridge University Press, 117-33.
80. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979a. “The Role of Institutional Structure in the Creation of Policy Equilibrium.” In Douglas W. Rae and Theodore J. Rismeir, eds., Public Policy and Public Choice, Vol. 6, Beverly Hills: Sage, 249-82.
81. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979b. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science, 23: 27-59.
82. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach.” Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1: 131-48.
83. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry Weingast. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review, 81: 85-104.
84. Shugart, Matthew and John Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
85. Smith, Rogers M. 1988. “Political Jurisprudence, the "New Institutionalism.” and the Future of American Law.” American Political Science Review, 82: 89-108.
86. Spafford, Duff. 1985. “Mill’s Majority Principle.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 18 No. 3 (September): 599-608.
87. Steinmo, Sven, Kathleen Thelen. and Frank Longstreth, eds. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
88. Taagepera, Rein. 1986. “Reformulating the Cube Law for Proportional Representation Elections.” American Political Science Review, 80: 489-504.
89. Taagepera, Rein. August 29-September 2, 1996.”Arend Lijphart and Dimensions of Democracy.” Prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California.
90. Taagepera, Rein and Bernard Grofman. 1985. “Rethinking Duverger, Law: Predicting the effective number of parties in plurality and PR systems-parties minus issues equals one” Europecui Journal of Political Research, Vol. 13: 341-52.
91. Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Shugart. 1989. Scats and Votes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
92. Thelen, Kathleen and Sven Steinmo. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” In Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, and Frank Longstreth, eds., Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
93. Weingast, Barry and William Marshall. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress, or Why Legislatures, Like Firms, are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Politica! Economy, 96: 132-64.
94. Williamson, Oliver. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology, 87: 548-77.
95. Wittman, Donald. 1983. “Efficient Rules in Highway Safety and Sports Activity.” American Economic Review, 72: 78-90.
96. Wittman, Donald A. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions are Efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
97. Wuffle, A 1999. “Credo of a Reasonable Choice Modeler.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2 No. 3: 203-06