The low cycle fatigue and plastic strain response of coiled tubing in a sour environment with and without corrosion inhibitor protection

Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition 2003, CT 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages

  Luft, H B ^a  

^a BJ SERVICES COMPANY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREHOLES; CANTILEVER BEAMS; CARBON STEEL; CORROSION FATIGUE; CORROSION INHIBITORS; CORROSION PROTECTION; CORROSION RESISTANCE; CORROSION RESISTANT ALLOYS; DRILL STRINGS; HIGH STRENGTH ALLOYS; INFILL DRILLING; STEEL CORROSION; STRAIN RATE; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; UNDERBALANCED DRILLING;

COILED TUBING OPERATIONS; DOUBLE CANTILEVER BEAM TEST; LABORATORY TESTING; LOW CYCLE FATIGUE LIFE; LOW CYCLE FATIGUES; MATERIAL PERFORMANCE; SLOW STRAIN RATE TESTS; STANDARD SOLUTIONS;

COILED TUBING;

EID: 85058886576     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. “Industry Recommended Practices for Critical Sour Under-balanced Drilling”, IRP 6.3, Drill String, Published by Petroleum Industry Training Service, (1999).
2. nd North American Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Montgomery, TX: (April 1-3, 1997).
3. Luft, H.B. and Wilde, G.: “Industry Guidelines for Under-balanced Coiled Tubing Drilling of Critical Sour Wells”, SPE/ICoTA Roundtable, paper no. SPE 54483, Houston, TX: (May, 1999).
4. Luft, H. B., Szklarz, K. E., Nowinka, J. and Skrzypek, H.: “Evaluating Fitness-For-Purpose Of Coiled Tubing For Under-balanced Drilling Of Sour Wells”, NACE paper No. 02054, presented at National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Annual Conference CORROSION/2002, Denver, Co: (April 7-12, 2002).
5. 2S Reservoirs”, paper SPE 46039, SPE/ICoTA Proceedings, Coiled Tubing Round Table, (April 15-16, 1998): p. 155.
6. 2S Environments”, National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) TM0177-96 Methods A & D (1996).
7. NACE International:”Slow Strain Rate Test Method for Screening Corrosion Resistant Alloys (CRAs) for Stress Corrosion Cracking in Sour Oilfield Service”, National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) TM0198-98, Item No. 21232, (1998).
8. Szklarz, K.E.: “Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance of Drilling Materials in a Simulated Under-balanced Drilling Environment”, NACE paper No.104, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Corrosion/98 Conference, (San Diego, CA: March, 1998).
9. Szklarz, K.E.: “Understanding the Size Effect in NACE TM0177 Method (DCB) Testing and Implications for Users”, NACE paper No. 01074, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Corrosion/2001 Conference, Houston, TX: (March, 2001).
10. Lyle, F.F and Norris, E.B.: “Evaluation of Sulfide SCC Resistance of High Strength Steels by the Constant-Strain-Rate Method”, Corrosion, Vol. 34, No. 6, (June, 1978), p. 193-198.
11. Hoey, G.R, Revie, R.W. and Ramsingh R.R.: “Comparison of the Slow Strain Rate Technique and the NACE Tensile Bar Test for Determining Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance of Oil Country Tubular Goods”, Report ERP/PMRL 86-36(J), Physical Metallurgy Research Laboratories, CANMET, Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Canada: (April 1986).
12. Kermani, M.B, Harrop, D. and MacCuish, R.G.: “Sulphide Stress Cracking of Downhole Tubular Steels”, NACE paper No. 272, Corrosion/1991 Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio, (March 1991).
13. Smuga-Otto, I., Wilde, G. and Luft, H. B.: “Coiled Tubing Performance Evaluation for Sour Service Under Variable Loading Conditions”, NACE paper No. 01080, Corrosion/2001 Conference, Houston, TX: (March, 2001).