Evaluating fitness-for-purpose of coiled tubing for underbalanced drilling of sour wells

NACE - International Corrosion Conference Series

Volumn 2002-April, Issue , 2002, Pages

  Luft, H B ^a   Szklarz, K E ^b   Nowinka, J ^c   Skrzypek, H ^d  

^a BJ SERVICES COMPANY   (Canada)

^b SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

^c C FER Technologies   (Canada)

^d Corr Met Engineering Designs Inc ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Coiled tubing; Double cantilever beam tests; Low cycle corrosion fatigue; Slow strain rate test; Sour wells; Sulfide stress cracking; Under balanced drilling

Indexed keywords

ALLOY STEEL; ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; CANTILEVER BEAMS; CORROSION FATIGUE; CRACKS; FRACTURE; HIGH STRENGTH ALLOYS; HYDROGEN EMBRITTLEMENT; NANOCANTILEVERS; OIL WELL DRILLING; SOFTWARE TESTING; STEEL TESTING; STRAIN RATE; STRESS CORROSION CRACKING; SULFIDE CORROSION CRACKING; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; UNDERBALANCED DRILLING; WELL TESTING;

DOUBLE CANTILEVER BEAM TEST; HIGH STRENGTH LOW ALLOY STEEL (HSLA); HYDROGEN-INDUCED CRACKING; JOINT INDUSTRY PROGRAMS; SLOW STRAIN RATE TESTING; SLOW STRAIN RATE TESTS; SULFIDE STRESS CRACKING; TENSION AND COMPRESSION;

COILED TUBING;

EID: 85009030653     PISSN: 03614409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. 2S Reservoirs", SPE/ICoTA Proceedings, Coiled Tubing Round Table, paper no. SPE 46039, April 15-16, (1998): p. 155.
2. nd North American Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Montgomery, Texas, April 1-3, (1997).
3. H.B. Luft and G. Wilde, "Industry Guidelines for Underbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling of Critical Sour Wells", SPE/ICoTA Roundtable, paper no. SPE 54483, (Houston, TX: May, 1999).
4. "Industry Recommended Practices for Critical Sour Underbalanced Drilling", IRP 6.3, Drill String, Published by Petroleum Industry Training Service, (1999).
5. 2S Environments", NACE TM0177-96 Methods A & D (1996).
6. NACE TM0198-98, "Slow Strain Rate Test Method for Screening Corrosion Resistant Alloys (CRAs) for Stress Corrosion Cracking in Sour Oilfield Service", Standard Method issued by NACE International, TM0198-98, Item No. 21232, (1998).
7. K.E. Szklarz, "Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance of Drilling Materials in a Simulated Underbalanced Drilling Environment", Corrosion/98, paper no. 104, (San Diego: NACE International, March, 1998).
8. K.E. Szklarz, "Understanding the Size Effect in NACE TM0177 Method (DCB) Testing and Implications for Users", Corrosion/2001, paper no. 01074, (Houston, TX: NACE International, March, 2001).
9. F.F. Lyle and E.B. Norris, "Evaluation of Sulfide SCC Resistance of High Strength Steels by the Constant-Strain-Rate Method", Corrosion, Vol. 34, No. 6, June, (1978): p. 193-198.
10. G.R. Hoey, R.W. Revie and R.R. Ramsingh, "Comparison of the Slow Strain Rate Technique and the NACE Tensile Bar Test for Determining Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance of Oil Country Tubular Goods", Report ERP/PMRL 86-36(J), Physical Metallurgy Research Laboratories, CANMET, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa, April (1986).
11. M.B. Kermani, D. Harrop and R.G. MacCuish, "Sulphide Stress Cracking of Downhole Tubular Steels", paper no. 272, NACE Corrosion 91 Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio, March (1991). Houston
12. I. Smuga-Otto, G. Wilde and H. B. Luft, "Coiled Tubing Performance Evaluation for Sour Service Under Variable Loading Conditions", Corrosion/2001 paper no. 01080, (Houston, TX: NACE International, March, 2001).