Barriers and enablers of COPD telerehabilitation – A frontline staff perspective

International Journal of COPD

Volumn 13, Issue , 2018, Pages 2473-2482

  Damhus, Christina Sadolin ^a   Emme, Christina ^a   Hansen, Henrik ^a  

^a FREDERIKSBERG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Health professionals; Implementation process; Qualitative research; Telecare; Theoretical domains framework

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL TRAINING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TELEREHABILITATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; TRIANGULATION; DENMARK; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KINESIOTHERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DENMARK; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSES; PHYSICAL THERAPISTS; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; TELEREHABILITATION;

EID: 85058457203     PISSN: 11769106     EISSN: 11782005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S167501     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agusti A, Hurd S, Jones P, Fabbri LM. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease. Available from: http://goldcopd.org/gold-2017-global-strategy-diagnosis-management-prevention-copd/. Accessed January 8, 2018.
2. WHO. Chronic respiratory diseases. Chronic respiratory diseases. Available from: http://www.who.int/respiratory/copd/burden/en/. Accessed January 8, 2018.
3. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2095–2128.
4. Liu WT, Wang CH, Lin HC, et al. Efficacy of a cell phone-based exercise programme for COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(3):651–659.
5. Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(8):e13–e64.
6. Puhan MA, Gimeno-Santos E, Cates CJ, Troosters T, Scharplatz M, Walters EH, Steurer J. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD005305.
7. Mccarthy B, Casey D, Devane D, Murphy K, Murphy E, Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2(2):CD003793.
8. Rugbjerg M, Iepsen UW, Jørgensen KJ, Lange P. Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD with mild symptoms: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015; 10:791–801.
9. Keating A, Lee A, Holland AE. What prevents people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from attending pulmonary rehabilitation? A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2011;8(2):89–99.
10. Bjoernshave B, Korsgaard J, Jensen C, Vinther Nielsen C. Participation in pulmonary rehabilitation in routine clinical practice. Clin Respir J. 2011;5(4):235–244.
11. Bjoernshave B, Korsgaard J, Nielsen CV. Does pulmonary rehabilitation work in clinical practice? A review on selection and dropout in randomized controlled trials on pulmonary rehabilitation. Clin Epidemiol. 2010;2:73–83.
12. Fischer MJ, Scharloo M, Abbink JJ, et al. Drop-out and attendance in pulmonary rehabilitation: The role of clinical and psychosocial variables. Respir Med. 2009;103(10):1564–1571.
13. Cox NS, Oliveira CC, Lahham A, Holland AE. Pulmonary rehabilitation referral and participation are commonly influenced by environment, knowledge, and beliefs about consequences: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework. J Physiother. 2017;63(2): 84–93.
14. Chaplin E, Hewitt S, Apps L, et al. Interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: a randomised controlled feasibility trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e013682.
15. Tsai LL, Mcnamara RJ, Moddel C, Alison JA, Mckenzie DK, Mckeough ZJ. Home-based telerehabilitation via real-time videocon-ferencing improves endurance exercise capacity in patients with COPD: The randomized controlled TeleR Study. Respirology. 2017;22(4): 699–707.
16. Bourne S, Devos R, North M, et al. Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e014580.
17. Vasilopoulou M, Papaioannou AI, Kaltsakas G, et al. Home-based maintenance tele-rehabilitation reduces the risk for acute exacerbations of COPD, hospitalisations and emergency department visits. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(5):1602129.
18. Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A. Home telemonitoring in COPD: A systematic review of methodologies and patients’ adherence. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):249–263.
19. Thokala P, Baalbaki H, Brennan A, et al. Telemonitoring after discharge from hospital with heart failure: cost-effectiveness modelling of alternative service designs. BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003250.
20. Hunting G, Shahid N, Sahakyan Y, et al. A multi-level qualitative analysis of Telehomecare in Ontario: challenges and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):544.
21. Hoaas H, Andreassen HK, Lien LA, Hjalmarsen A, Zanaboni P. Adherence and factors affecting satisfaction in long-term telerehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(1):26.
22. Vatnøy TK, Thygesen E, Dale B. Telemedicine to support coping resources in home-living patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Patients’ experiences. J Telemed Telecare. 2016; 01357633X(1):15626854.
23. Dinesen B, Andersen SK, Hejlesen O, Toft E. Interaction between COPD patients and healthcare professionals in a cross-sector tele-rehabilitation programme. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:28–32.
24. Seidman Z, Mcnamara R, Wootton S, et al. People attending pulmonary rehabilitation demonstrate a substantial engagement with technology and willingness to use telerehabilitation: a survey. J Physiother. 2017; 63(3):175–181.
25. Sharma U, Clarke M. Nurses’ and community support workers’ experience of telehealth: a longitudinal case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):164.
26. Odeh B, Kayyali R, Nabhani-Gebara S, Philip N. Implementing a telehealth service: nurses’ perceptions and experiences. Br J Nurs. 2014; 23(21):1133–1137.
27. Rykkje L, Hjorth GHB. “Safety at Home”: experiences from testing of video communication between patients and home health care personnel. Sage Open. 2017;7(4):1–11.
28. Brewster L, Mountain G, Wessels B, Kelly C, Hawley M. Factors affecting front line staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: A mixed-method systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(1): 21–33.
29. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.
30. Dyson J, Lawton R, Jackson C, Cheater F. Does the use of a theoretical approach tell us more about hand hygiene behaviour? The barriers and levers to hand hygiene. J Infect Prev. 2011;12(1):17–24.
31. Grol R. Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care. 2nd ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
32. Winter S, Nielsen V. Implementation of Politics. 1st ed. Copenhagen: Gyldendal; 2008.
33. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.
34. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects – WMA – The World Medical Association. Available from: https://www.wma. net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed December 13, 2017.
35. Gilbert N. Researching Social Life. London: Sage Publications; 2001:406.
36. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meaning. Vol. 34. Honoken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1985.
37. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2013:18–96.
38. Meyer S, Ward P. ‘How to’ Use Social Theory Within and Throughout Qualitative Research in Healthcare Contexts. Sociol Compass. 2014;8(5):525–539.
39. Brunton L, Bower P, Sanders C. The Contradictions of Telehealth User Experience in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139561.
40. Fairbrother P, Pinnock H, Hanley J, et al. Continuity, but at what cost? The impact of telemonitoring COPD on continuities of care: A qualitative study. Prim Care Respir J. 2012;21(3):322–328.
41. Mair FS, Hiscock J, Beaton SC. Understanding factors that inhibit or promote the utilization of telecare in chronic lung disease. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(2):110–117.
42. Hibbert D, Mair FS, May CR, et al. Health professionals’ responses to the introduction of a home telehealth service. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(4):226–230.
43. Ure J, Pinnock H, Hanley J, et al. Piloting tele-monitoring in COPD: A mixed methods exploration of issues in design and implementation. Prim Care Respir J. 2012;21(1):57–64.
44. Taylor J, Coates E, Brewster L, Mountain G, Wessels B, Hawley MS. Examining the use of telehealth in community nursing: identifying the factors affecting frontline staff acceptance and telehealth adoption. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(2):326–337.
45. Sølling KI, Carøe P, Lindgren K, Mathiesen KS. Online Communication and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:910.
46. Horton K. The use of telecare for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: implications for management. Nursing. 2008;16(2):173–180.
47. Inskip JA, Lauscher HN, Li LC, et al. Patient and health care professional perspectives on using telehealth to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation. Chron Respir Dis. 2018;15(1):71–80.
48. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
49. Kvale S. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. 1st ed. Copenhagen: Sage; 1996.
50. Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage Publ. 1997: 32–46.
51. Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed. Sage; 1994.
52. Kidd PS, Parshall MB. Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2000; 10(3):293–308.
53. Belzile JA, Öberg G. Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qual Res. 2012;12(4): 459–472.