The contradictions of telehealth user experience in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A qualitative meta-synthesis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Brunton, Lisa ^a   Bower, Peter ^a   Sanders, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; EMPOWERMENT; HELP SEEKING BEHAVIOR; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; SELF CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELEHEALTH; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PROCEDURES; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; PULMONOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TELEMEDICINE; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATA COLLECTION; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HELP-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; PULMONARY MEDICINE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84949036126     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139561     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Sanders C, Rogers A. Bodies in Context: Potential Avenues of Inquiry for the Sociology of Chronic Illness and Disability Within a New Policy Era. Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing: A Blueprint for the 21st Century. 2011:483-504. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7261-3-25. ISI:000285946500025.
2. Department of Health. High Quality Care for All. NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. In: Department of Health, editor. London: Department of Health,; 2008.
3. Barlow J, Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T. Scaling up Remote Care in the United Kingdom: Lessons from a Decade of Policy Intervention. In: Glassock A, Kutzik D, editors. Essential Lessons for the Success of Telehomecare: IOS Press; 2012. p. 223-36.
4. Bolton CE, Waters CS, Peirce S, Elwyn G. Insufficient evidence of benefit: A systematic review of home telemonitoring for COPD. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2011; 17(6):1216-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01536.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01536.x
5. Bower P, Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Barlow J, Hendy J, Knapp M, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of the impact of telemonitoring in patients with long-term conditions and social care needs: protocol for the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11:184. PMID: 21819569. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-184
6. World Health Organisation. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2014 [19.01.15]. Available: http://www.who.int/respiratory/copd/en/.
7. World Health Organisation. The Global Burden of Disease, 2004 update. Switzerland: World Health Organisation, 2008.
8. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy - lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science. 1996; 274(5288):740-3. PMID: 8966556.
9. Department of Health. Facts about COPD 2010 [19.01.15.]. Available: http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Longtermconditions/COPD/DH-113006.
10. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, Hutton B, McGill S, Palmer K, et al. Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2010; 16(3):120-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090812. PMID: 20197355. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009. 090812
11. McLean S, Nurmatov U, Liu JL, Pagliari C, Car J, Sheikh A. Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011;(7: ):CD007718. PMID: 21735417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007718.pub2
12. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013; 50(5):587-92. Epub 2012/11/20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010 PMID: 23159157.
13. Schot J, De La Bruheze A. The Mediated Design of Products, Consumption, and Consumers in the Twentieth Century. In: Oudshoorn N, Pinch T, editors. How users matter The co-construction of users and technology. London: MIT Press; 2005.
14. Goodband S. The Need to Build Sustainable Business Models to Ensure that Telehomecare can Deliver Care. In: Glassock A, Kutzik D, editors. Essential Lessons for the Success of Telehomecare: IOS Press; 2012.
15. Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56 (4):671-84. Epub 2003/02/01. PMID: 12560003.
16. Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1999; 38(3):215-29.
17. Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B, et al. Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC medical research methodology. 2004; 4:5. Epub 2004/04/09. doi:10. 1186/1471-2288-4-5 PMID: 15070427; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC385230.
18. Flemming K, Briggs M. Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007; 57(1):95-100. Epub 2006/12/23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648. 2006.04083.x PMID: 17184378.
19. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC medical research methodology. 2006; 6:35. Epub 2006/07/29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35 PMID: 16872487; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1559637.
20. Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC medical research methodology. 2008; 8. Artn 21 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21. ISI:000255651600001. PMID: 18416812
21. Booth A. Cochrane or cock-eyed? how should we conduct systematic reviews of qualitative research? Qualitative Evidence-based Practice Conference, Taking a Critical Stance; 14-16 May 2001; Coventry University2001.
22. Masood M, Thaliath ET, Bower EJ, Newton JT. An appraisal of the quality of published qualitative dental research. Community Dent Oral. 2011; 39(3):193-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00584.x. ISI:000290626400001.
23. Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). CASP Qualitative Checklist Oxford: CASP; 2013 [accessed on: 20.01.15]. Available: http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87-951541699e9edc71ce66c9bac4734c69. pdf.
24. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies: Sage; 1988.
25. Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, Daker-White G, Britten N, Pill R, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technol Assess. 2011; 15(43):1-164. Epub 2011/12/20. doi: 10.3310/hta15430 PMID: 22176717.
26. Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J,Morgan M, Pill R. Usingmeta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2002; 7(4):209-15.
27. Horton K. The use of telecare for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: implications for management. Journal of Nursing Management. 2008; 16(2):173-80. WOS:000207690600012. PMID: 18269548
28. Fairbrother P, Pinnock H, Hanley J, McCloughan L, Sheikh A, Pagliari C, et al. Exploring telemonitoring and self-management by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A qualitative study embedded in a randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling. 2013; 93(3):403-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.003. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.003 PMID: 23647981
29. Fairbrother P, Pinnock H, Hanley J, McCloughan L, Sheikh A, Pagliari C, et al. Continuity, but at what cost? The impact of telemonitoring COPD on continuities of care: a qualitative study. Prim Care Respir J. 2012; 21(3):322-8. Epub 2012/08/10. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00068 PMID: 22875143.
30. Mair FS, Hiscock J, Beaton SC. Understanding factors that inhibit or promote the utilization of telecare in chronic lung disease. Chronic Illness. 2008; 4(2):110-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742395308092482. doi: 10.1177/1742395308092482
31. Hibbert D, Mair FS, May CR, Boland A, O'Connor J, Capewell S, et al. Health professionals' responses to the introduction of a home telehealth service. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2004; 10 (4):226-30. doi: 10.1258/1357633041424386. WOS:000223127800007. PMID: 15273033
32. Dinesen B, Huniche L, Toft E. Attitudes of COPD Patients towards Tele-Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sector Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013; 10(11):6184-98 doi: 10.3390/ijerph10116184. WOS:000330520800051. PMID: 24247995
33. Huniche L, Dinesen B, Nielsen C, Grann O, Toft E. Patients' Use of Self-Monitored Readings for Managing Everyday Life with COPD: A Qualitative Study. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2013; 19(5):396-402. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0135. WOS:000317899200015. PMID: 23531094
34. Williams V, Price J, Hardinge M, Tarassenko L, Farmer A. Using a mobile health application to support self-management in COPD: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice. 2014; 64(624): E392-E400. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680473. WOS:000338927800002. PMID: 24982491
35. Gale N, Sultan H. Telehealth as 'peace of mind': embodiment, emotions and the home as the primary health space for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Health & Place. 2013; 21:140-7.
36. Ure J, Pinnock H, Hanley J, Kidd G, McCall Smith E, Tarling A, et al. Piloting tele-monitoring in COPD: a mixed methods exploration of issues in design and implementation. Primary Care Respiratory Journal. 2012; 21(1):57-64. PMID: 21785816. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00065
37. MacNeill V, Sanders C, Fitzpatrick R, Hendy J, Barlow J, Knapp M, et al. Experiences of front-line health professionals in the delivery of telehealth: a qualitative study. The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2014; 64(624):e401-7. Epub 2014/07/02. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680485 PMID: 24982492; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4073725.
38. Segar J, Rogers A, Salisbury C, Thomas C. Roles and identities in transition: boundaries of work and inter-professional relationships at the interface between telehealth and primary care. Health Soc Care Comm. 2013; 21(6):606-13. doi: 10.1111/Hsc.12047. ISI:000325469300004.
39. Pols J, Willems D. Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2011; 33(3):484-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x. WOS:000288017700010.
40. Commission Healthcare. Clearing the air: a national study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. London: Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection; 2006. 60 p. p.
41. May C. Mobilising modern facts: health technology assessment and the politics of evidence. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2006; 28(5):513-32. PMID: 16910945.
42. Williams T,May C, Mair F, Mort M, Gask L. Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care. Health Policy. 2003; 64(1):39-54. PMID: 12644327.
43. May C, Mort M, Mair F, Williams T. Factors affecting the adoption of telehealthcare in the United Kingdom: the policy context and the problem of evidence. Health Informatics Journal. 2001; 7(3-4):131-4. doi: 10.1177/146045820100700304
44. Gorst SL, Armitage C, Hawley M, Coates E. Exploring patient beliefs and perceptions about sustained use of telehealth. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2013; 13(7). WOS:000327719200029.
45. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2012; 12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-220. WOS:000307223700001.