A genome-scale metabolic model of potato late blight suggests a photosynthesis suppression mechanism 06 Biological Sciences 0607 Plant Biology

BMC Genomics

Volumn 19, Issue , 2018, Pages

  Botero, Kelly ^a,c   Restrepo, Silvia ^b   Pinzón, Andres ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^c Ecoparque Los Yarumos Edificio BIOS   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Compatible interaction; Flux balance analysis; Metabolic reconstruction; Phytophthora infestans; Solanum tuberosum; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CALCULATION; CARBON FIXATION; CROP PRODUCTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS; POTATO; POTATO LATE BLIGHT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; METABOLISM; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT GENOME; PLANT LEAF;

PLANT PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTOME;

GENOME, PLANT; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT PROTEINS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85058338932     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5192-x     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444(7117):323-9 Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature05286. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
2. Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:205-27.
3. Bellincampi DCervone Cervone F, Lionetti V. Plant cell wall dynamics and wall-related susceptibility in plant-pathogen interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2014;28(5):228.
4. Kamoun S. A catalogue of the effector Secretome of plant pathogenic oomycetes. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44(1):41-60 Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143436.
5. Tyler BM. Molecular basis of recognition between phytophthora pathogens and their hosts. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:137-67 Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120601.125310. Cited 3 Oct 2015.
6. Rojas CM, Senthil-Kumar M, Tzin V, Mysore KS. Regulation of primary plant metabolism during plant-pathogen interactions and its contribution to plant defense. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5(February):1-12 Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2014.00017/abstract.
7. Ali A, Alexandersson E, Sandin M, Resjö S, Lenman M, Hedley P, et al. Quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics of potato in response to Phytophthora infestans in compatible and incompatible interactions. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1-18.
8. Ribeiro D, Ribeiro O, Erwin D. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. St. Paul: American Phytopathological Society; 1996. p. 561.
9. Bolinder MA, Kätterer T, Poeplau C, Börjesson G, Parent LE. Net primary productivity and below-ground crop residue inputs for root crops: potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Can J Soil Sci. 2015;95(2):87-93 Available from: http://pubs.aic.ca/doi/10.4141/cjss-2014-091.
10. Li J, Zhu L, Lu G, Zhan X-B, Lin C-C, Zheng Z-Y. Curdlan β-1,3-glucooligosaccharides induce the defense responses against Phytophthora infestans infection of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. McCain G1) leaf cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97197 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4016274&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Cited 8 Oct 2015.
11. Solano J, Acuña I, Esnault F, Brabant P. Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in Solanum tuberosum landraces in Southern Chile. Trop Plant Pathol. 2014;39(4):307-15 Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S1982-56762014000400005&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en. Cited 8 Oct 2015.
12. Yoshida K, Schuenemann VJ, Cano LM, Pais M, Mishra B, Sharma R, et al. The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. Elife. 2013;2:1-25 Available from: http://elifesciences.org/lookup/doi/10.7554/eLife.00731.
13. Haas BJ, Kamoun S, Zody MC, Jiang RHY, Handsaker RE, Cano LM, et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature. 2009;461(7262):393-8 Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature08358.
14. Szallasi Z, Stelling J, Periwal V, editors. System modeling in cellular biology: from concepts to nuts and bolts. Boston: The MIT Press; 2006.
15. Pinzón A, Barreto E, Bernal A, Achenie L, González Barrios AF, Isea R, et al. Computational models in plant-pathogen interactions: the case of Phytophthora infestans. Theor Biol Med Model. 2009;6(1):24 Available from: http://www.tbiomed.com/content/6/1/24.
16. Restrepo S, Myers KL, del Pozo O, Martin GB, Hart AL, Buell CR, et al. Gene profiling of a compatible interaction between Phytophthora infestans and Solanum tuberosum suggests a role for carbonic anhydrase. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005;18(9):913-22.
17. Gyetvai G, Sønderkær M, Göbel U, Basekow R, Ballvora A, Imhoff M, et al. The Transcriptome of Compatible and Incompatible Interactions of Potato (Solanum tuberosum) with Phytophthora infestans Revealed by DeepSAGE Analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31526 Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031526.
18. Gao L, Tu Z, Millett BP, Bradeen JM. Insights into organ-specific pathogen defense responses in plants: RNA-seq analysis of potato tuber-Phytophthora infestans interactions. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):340 Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/14/340. Cited 4 Oct 2015.
19. Becker SA, Palsson BØ. Genome-scale reconstruction of the metabolic network in Staphylococcus aureus N315: an initial draft to the two-dimensional annotation. BMC Microbiol. 2005;5:8.
20. MacLeod M, Nersessian NJ. Modeling systems-level dynamics: Understanding without mechanistic explanation in integrative systems biology. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2015;49:1-11 Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S136984861400154X.
21. Oberhardt MA, Palsson BØ, Papin JA. Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions. Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5(320):320.
22. Heavner BD, Price ND. Transparency in metabolic network reconstruction enables scalable biological discovery. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;34:105-9 Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0958166914002250.
23. Radrich K, Tsuruoka Y, Dobson P, Gevorgyan A, Swainston N, Baart G, et al. Integration of metabolic databases for the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks. BMC Syst Biol. 2010;4:1-16.
24. Poolman MG, Miguet L, Sweetlove LJ, Fell DA. A genome-scale metabolic model of Arabidopsis and some of its properties. Plant Physiol. 2009;151(3):1570-81.
25. de Oliveira Dal'Molin CG, Quek L-E, Palfreyman RW, Brumbley SM, Nielsen LK. AraGEM, a genome-scale reconstruction of the primary metabolic network in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(2):579-89.
26. Mintz-Oron S, Meir S, Malitsky S, Ruppin E, Aharoni A, Shlomi T. Reconstruction of Arabidopsis metabolic network models accounting for subcellular compartmentalization and tissue-specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(1):339-44.
27. Grafahrend-Belau E, Schreiber F, Koschützki D, Junker BH. Flux balance analysis of barley seeds: a computational approach to study systemic properties of central metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(1):585-98.
28. Dal'Molin CGDO, Quek L-E, Palfreyman RW, Brumbley SM, Nielsen LK. C4GEM, a genome-scale metabolic model to study C4 plant metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(4):1871-85.
29. Saha R, Suthers PF, Maranas CD. Zea mays irs1563: a comprehensive genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of maize metabolism. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21784.
30. Simons M, Saha R, Amiour N, Kumar A, Guillard L, Clement G, et al. Assessing the Metabolic Impact of Nitrogen Availability Using a Compartmentalized Maize Leaf Genome-Scale Model. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(3):1659-74 Available from: http://www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.114.245787.
31. Pilalis E, Chatziioannou A, Thomasset B, Kolisis F. An in silico compartmentalized metabolic model of Brassica napus enables the systemic study of regulatory aspects of plant central metabolism. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108(7):1673-82.
32. Hay J, Schwender J. Metabolic network reconstruction and flux variability analysis of storage synthesis in developing oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) embryos. Plant J. 2011;67(3):526-41.
33. Poolman MG, Kundu S, Shaw R, Fell DA. Responses to light intensity in a genome-scale model of rice metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2013;162(2):1060-72 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3668040&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
34. Yuan H, Cheung CYM, Poolman MG, Hilbers PAJ, van Riel NAW. A genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its application to photorespiratory metabolism. Plant J. 2016;85(2):289-304 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576489. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
35. Thiele I, Palsson BØ. A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(1):93-121.
36. Seaver SMD, Henry CS, Hanson AD. Frontiers in metabolic reconstruction and modeling of plant genomes. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(6):2247-58.
37. Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming RMT, Thiele I, Orth JD, Feist AM, et al. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(9):1290-307.
38. Varma A, Palsson BO. Metabolic flux balancing: basic concepts, scientific and practical use. Bio/Technology. 1994;12(10):994-8.
39. Chen N, Del Val IJ, Kyriakopoulos S, Polizzi KM, Kontoravdi C. Metabolic network reconstruction: advances in in silico interpretation of analytical information. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23(1):77-82.
40. Töpfer N, Caldana C, Grimbs S, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR, Nikoloski Z. Integration of genome-scale modeling and transcript profiling reveals metabolic pathways underlying light and temperature acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25(4):1197-211 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3663262&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
41. Halim VA, Altmann S, Ellinger D, Eschen-Lippold L, Miersch O, Scheel D, et al. PAMP-induced defense responses in potato require both salicylic acid and jasmonic acid. Plant J. 2009;57(2):230-42 Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03688.x.
42. Cheung CYM, Williams TCR, Poolman MG, Fell DA, Ratcliffe RG, Sweetlove LJ. A method for accounting for maintenance costs in flux balance analysis improves the prediction of plant cell metabolic phenotypes under stress conditions. Plant J. 2013;75(6):1050-61.
43. Coffey MD, Wilson UE. An ultrastructural study of the late-blight fungus Phytophthora infestans and its interaction with the foliage of two potato cultivars possessing different levels of general (field) resistance. Can J Bot. 1983;61:2669-85.
44. Ristaino JB, Gumpertz ML. New frontiers in the study of dispersal and spatial analysis of epidemics caused by species in the genus phytophthora. Phytopathology. 2000;38:541-76.
45. Schwachtje J, Fischer A, Erban A, Kopka J. Primed primary metabolism in systemic leaves: a functional systems analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1-11.
46. Bolton MD. Primary metabolism and plant defense - fuel for the fire. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009;22(5):487-97 Available from: http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/MPMI-22-5-0487.
47. Berger S, Sinha AK, Roitsch T. Plant physiology meets phytopathology: plant primary metabolism and plant-pathogen interactions. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(15-16):4019-26.
48. Arnon DI, Allen MB, Whatley FR. Photosynthesis by Isolated Chloroplasts. Nature. 1954;174(4426):394-6 Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/174394a0. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
49. Whatley FR, Allen MB, Trebst AV, Arnon DI. Photosynthesis by solated chloroplasts IX. Photosynthetic phosphorylation and CO2 assimilation in different species. Plant Physiol. 1960;35(2):188-93 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16655327. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
50. Hervás M, Navarro JA, De La Rosa MA. Electron transfer between membrane complexes and soluble proteins in photosynthesis. Acc Chem Res. 2003;36(10):798-805.
51. Allen JF. Photosynthesis of ATP-electrons, proton pumps, rotors, and poise. Cell. 2002;110(3):273-6.
52. Allen JF. Cyclic, pseudocyclic and noncyclic photophosphorylation: new links in the chain. Trends Plant Sci. 2003;8(1):15-9.
53. Arnon DI. The chloroplast as a functional unit in photosynthesis. In: Ruhland W, Ashby E, Bonner J, Geiger-Huber M, James WO, Lang A, et al., editors. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1960. p. 773-829. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-94798-8-28. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
54. Berg J, Tymoczko J, Stryer L. The Light Reactions of Photosynthesis. In: Biochemistry 5th edition. New York: W.H. Freeman; 2002. p. 1050.
55. Stephanopoulos GN, Aristidou AA, Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering. Principles and methodologies. Metabolic engineering. Principles and methodologies. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p. 22-66.
56. Koch C, Noga G, Strittmatter G. Photosynthetic electron transport is differentially affected during early stages of cultivar/race-specific interactions between potato and Phytophthora infestans. Planta. 1994;193(4):551-7 Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02411561. Cited 18 Nov 2016.
57. Yen J, Tanniche I, Fisher AK, Gillaspy GE, Bevan DR, Senger RS. Designing metabolic engineering strategies with genome-scale metabolic flux modeling. Adv Genomics Genet. 2015;5:93-105.
58. Wingler A, Lea PJ, Quick WP, Leegood RC. Photorespiration: metabolic pathways and their role in stress protection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2000;355(1402):1517-29 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11128005. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
59. Eckardt NA. Photorespiration Revisited. Plant Cell Online. 2005;17(8):2139-41 Available from: http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.105.035873. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
60. Noctor G, Arisi A-CM, Jouanin L, Foyer CH. Photorespiratory glycine enhances glutathione accumulation in both the chloroplastic and cytosolic compartments. J Exp Bot. 1999;50(336):1157-67 Available from: http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/jxb/50.336.1157. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
61. Peterhansel C, Horst I, Niessen M, Blume C, Kebeish R, Kürkcüoglu S, et al. Photorespiration. Arab B. 2010;8:e0130 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22303256. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
62. Slesak I, Libik M, Karpinska B, Karpinski S, Miszalski Z. The role of hydrogen peroxide in regulation of plant metabolism and cellular signalling in response to environmental stresses. Acta Biochim Pol. 2007;54(1):39-50.
63. Dangl JL, Jones JDG. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001;411(6839):826-33 Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/35081161. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
64. Apostol I, Heinstein PF, Low PS. Rapid Stimulation of an Oxidative Burst during Elicitation of Cultured Plant Cells: Role in Defense and Signal Transduction. Plant Physiol. 1989;90(1):109-16 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16666719. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
65. Doke N. NADPH-dependent O2- generation in membrane fractions isolated from wounded potato tubers inoculated with Phytophthora infestans. Physiol Plant Pathol. 1985;27(3):311-22.
66. Foyer CH, Noctor G. Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and Signalling. New Phytol. 2000;146:359-88.
67. Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55(1):373-99 Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701.
68. Klessig DF, Durner J, Noad R, Navarre DA, Wendehenne D, Kumar D, et al. Nitric oxide and salicylic acid signaling in plant defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(16):8849-55 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10922045. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
69. Mittler R, Herr EH, Orvar BL, van Camp W, Willekens H, Inzé D, et al. Transgenic tobacco plants with reduced capability to detoxify reactive oxygen intermediates are hyperresponsive to pathogen infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(24):14165-70 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10570216. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
70. Delledonne M, Zeier J, Marocco A, Lamb C. Signal interactions between nitric oxide and reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(23):13454-9 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11606758. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
71. Baker CJ, Orlandi EW. Active Oxygen in Plant Pathogenesis. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1995;33(1):299-321 Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.001503. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
72. Karp G. Photosynthesis and chloropast. In: Cell and molecular biology concepts and experiments. 6th ed. USA: Wiley; 2009. p. 206-29.
73. Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudaira P, Baltimore D, Darnell J. Molecular cell biology. 4th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman; 2000. p. 968.
74. Sulpice R, Pyl E-T, Ishihara H, Trenkamp S, Steinfath M, Witucka-Wall H, et al. Starch as a major integrator in the regulation of plant growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(25):10348-53 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19506259. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
75. Geigenberger P. Regulation of starch biosynthesis in response to a fluctuating environment. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(4):1566-77.
76. Obana Y, Omoto D, Kato C, Matsumoto K, Nagai Y, Kavakli IH, et al. Enhanced turnover of transitory starch by expression of up-regulated ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2006;170(1):1-11.
77. Hendriks JHM, Kolbe A, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Geigenberger P. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is activated by posttranslational redox-modification in response to light and to sugars in leaves of Arabidopsis and other plant species. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(2):838-49 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12972664. Cited 2 Dec 2016.
78. Stitt M, Huber S, Kerr P. Control of photosynthetic sucrose synthesis. In MD Hatch, NK Boardman, eds, The Biochemistry of Plants. In: Hatch M, Boardman N, editors. The Biochemistry of Plants, The Biochemistry of Plants. New York: Academic Press; 1987;10:327-409.
79. Geigenberger P, Stitt M. Diurnal changes in sucrose, nucleotides, starch synthesis and AGPS transcript in growing potato tubers that are suppressed by decreased expression of sucrose phosphate synthase. Plant J. 2000;23(6):795-806 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10998190. Cited 3 Dec 2016.
80. Tetlow IJ, Beisel KG, Cameron S, Makhmoudova A, Liu F, Bresolin NS, et al. Analysis of Protein Complexes in Wheat Amyloplasts Reveals Functional Interactions among Starch Biosynthetic Enzymes. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(4):1878-91 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18263778. Cited 3 Dec 2016.
81. Gibon Y, Blaesing OE, Hannemann J, Carillo P, Höhne M, Hendriks JHM, et al. A Robot-Based Platform to Measure Multiple Enzyme Activities in Arabidopsis Using a Set of Cycling Assays: Comparison of Changes of Enzyme Activities and Transcript Levels during Diurnal Cycles and in Prolonged Darkness. Plant Cell Online. 2004;16(12):3304-25 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15548738. Cited 3 Dec 2016.
82. Smith SM, Fulton DC, Chia T, Thorneycroft D, Chapple A, Dunstan H, et al. Diurnal Changes in the Transcriptome Encoding Enzymes of Starch Metabolism Provide Evidence for Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of Starch Metabolism in Arabidopsis Leaves. Plant Physiol. 2004;136(1):2687-99 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15347792. Cited 3 Dec 2016.
83. Lawlor DW, Tezara W, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SD. Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature. 1999;401(6756):914-7 Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/44842. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
84. Lack A, Evans DE. In: Owen E, editor. Plant biology. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis group; 2005. p. 351.
85. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S. Modelling of Photosynthetic Response to Environmental Conditions. In: Physiological Plant Ecology II. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1982. p. 549-87. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-68150-9-17. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
86. Sage RF. A model describing the regulation of Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, Electron transport, and triose phosphate use in response to light intensity and CO2 in C3 plants. Plant Physiol. 1990;94(4):1728-34 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1077445&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
87. Agren R, Liu L, Shoaie S, Vongsangnak W, Nookaew I, Nielsen J. The RAVEN toolbox and its use for generating a genome-scale metabolic model for Penicillium chrysogenum. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002980.
88. Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature. 2011;475(7355):189-95 Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature10158.
89. Jankowski MD, Henry CS, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. Group contribution method for thermodynamic analysis of complex metabolic networks. Biophys J. 2008;95(3):1487-99 Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006349508702157.
90. Osorio D, Gonzalez J, Pinzon-Velasco A. minval: MINimal VALidation for Stoichiometric Reactions [Internet]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2016 [cited 2016 Sep 1]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/minval/index.html
91. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S, et al. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D354-7 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16381885. Cited 15 Nov 2016.
92. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(D1):D109-14 Available from: http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkr988.
93. Plant Metabolic Network (PMN) [Internet]. Available from: http://pmn.plantcyc.org/POTATO/organism-summary on www.plantcyc.org. Cited 8 May 2016.
94. Tenenbaum D. KEGGREST: Client-side REST access to KEGG. R package version 1.14.0. 2016.
95. Botero K, Osorio D, Gonzalez J, Pinzon A. g2f: Find and Fill Gaps in Metabolic Networks [Internet]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2016 [cited 2016 Sep 1]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/g2f/index.html
96. Botero K. Sot-g2f [Internet]. Bogota, Colombia; 2016. Available from: https://github.com/kellybotero/PotatoRecon/blob/master/Code/Sot-g2f.R
97. Flamholz A, Noor E, Bar-Even A, Milo R. eQuilibrator - the biochemical thermodynamics calculator. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D770-5 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22064852. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
98. Caspi R, Billington R, Ferrer L, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;44(D1):D471-80.
99. Botero K, Osorio D. Reversibility [Internet]. Bogota, Colombia; 2016. Available from: https://github.com/kellybotero/PotatoRecon/blob/master/Code/Reversibility.R
100. Ebrahim A, Lerman JA, Palsson BO, Hyduke DR. COBRApy: COnstraints-based reconstruction and analysis for Python. 2013
101. Gelius-Dietrich G. sybil - Efficient Constrained Based Modelling in R. BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7(1):42 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3843580&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
102. Poorter H, Bergkotte M. Chemical composition of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Cell Environ. 1992;15(2):221-9 Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01476.x. Cited 13 Nov 2016.
103. Niemann GJ, JBM P, Eijkel GB, Poorter H, Boon JJ. Differential chemical allocation and plant adaptation: A Py-MS Study of 24 species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Soil. 1995;175(2):275-89 Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00011364. Cited 13 Nov 13.
104. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403-10 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2231712. Cited 10 Jul 2014.
105. Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium. SolTub-3.0 [Internet]. Available from: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/000/226/075/GCF-000226075.1-SolTub-3.0 [cited 2016 Sep 20].
106. Botero K. Summarization [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://github.com/kellybotero/PotatoRecon/blob/master/Code/summarization.R
107. Carlson M. R Interface to UniProt web services. 2014.
108. Gentleman R, Carey V, Morgan M, Falcon S. Biobase: Base functions for Bioconductor. 2016.
109. Osorio D, Botero K, Gonzalez J, Pinzon A. exp2flux: Convert Gene EXPression Data to FBA FLUXes [Internet]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2016. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/exp2flux/index.html. [cited 2016 Sep 1].
110. Tomar N, De RK. Comparing methods for metabolic network analysis and an application to metabolic engineering. Gene. 2013;521:1-14 Elsevier B.V. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.017.