Investigation on land cover mapping capability of maximum likelihood classifier: A case study on North Canara, India

Procedia Computer Science

Volumn 143, Issue , 2018, Pages 579-586

  Shivakumar, B R ^a   Rajashekararadhya, S V ^b  

^a NMAM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b Kalpataru Institute of Technology   (India)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; Land cover mapping; Mahalanobis distance; Maximum likelihood classification; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MAPPING; PIXELS; REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; LAND COVER MAPPING; LAND USE/ LAND COVERS; MAHALANOBIS DISTANCES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFICATIONS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFIERS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EID: 85058329704     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770509     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.434     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ahmad, A., Quegan, S., 2012. Analysis of maximum likelihood classification on multispectral data. Applied Mathematical Sciences 6, 6425-6436.
2. Bruzzone, L., Prieto, D.F., 2001. Unsupervised retraining of a maximum likelihood classifier for the analysis of multitemporal remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39, 456-460.
3. Ediriwickrema, J., Khorram, S., 1997. Hierarchical maximum-likelihood classification for improved accuracies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35, 810-816.
4. Jensen, J.R., 2000. Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. 3 ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
5. Jensen, J.R., 2006. Remote sensing agricultural crop type for sustainable development in south africa. Geocarto International 21, 5-18.
6. Kuchay, S.A., Ramachandra, T.V., 2016. Land use land cover change analysis of uttara kannada. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 2, 460-471.
7. LPDAAC, 2016. Land processes distributed active archive center. URL: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/.
8. Lu, D., Weng, Q., 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International journal of Remote sensing 28, 823-870.
9. Mather, P.M., 1985. A computationally-efficient maximum-likelihood classifier employing prior probabilities for remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 6, 369-376.
10. Richards, J.A., 2013. Remote sensing digital image analysis. 5 ed., Springer.
11. Richards, J.A., Jia, X., 2006. Remote sensing digital image analysis. 4 ed., Springer.
12. Shivakumar, B.R., Rajashekararadhya, S.V., 2017. Spectral similarity for evaluating classification performance of traditional classifiers, in: 2017 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), IEEE. pp. 1999-2004.
13. Strahler, A.H., 1980. The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed data. Remote sensing of Environment 10, 135-163.
14. Susaki, J., Shibasaki, R., 2000. Maximum likelihood method modified in estimating a prior probability and in improving misclassification errors. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 33, 1499-1504.
15. Swain, P.H., Davis, S.M., 1978. Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach. McGraw-Hill.
16. USGS, 2016. Earthexplorer. URL: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
17. Venkateswarulu, J., Ramakrishna, Y.S., Rao, A.S., 1996. Agro-climatic zones of india. Annals of Arid Zone 35, 1-7.
18. Yang, T., Li, J., Yu, J., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., 2015. Diverse scene stitching from a large-scale aerial video dataset. Remote Sensing 7, 6932-6949.
19. Zaki, M., El Tohamy, F., Hassan, A., 1995. Landsat image interpretation. Computational statistics & data analysis 20, 75-97.
20. Zanter, K., 2005. Landsat 8 (l8) data users handbook. LSDS-1574 Version 1.