Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 211, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 249.e1-249.e16

  Gibson, Kelly S ^a   Waters, Thaddeus P ^b   Bailit, Jennifer L ^a  

^a METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

elective induction of labor; expectant management; induction and cesarean

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BISHOP SCORE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEATH; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LABOR INDUCTION; LACERATION; LOW RISK PATIENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL INFECTION; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL OUTCOME; NEONATAL OUTCOME; NEWBORN; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NULLIPARA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERAL INFECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ELECTIVE INDUCTION OF LABOR; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; INDUCTION AND CESAREAN;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, INDUCED; MORBIDITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 85058205411     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. J.D. Yeast, A. Jones, and M. Poskin Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions Am J Obstet Gynecol 180 1999 628 633
2. K.M. Smith, M.K. Hoffman, and A. Sciscione Elective induction of labor in nulliparous women increases the risk of cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol 101 2003 45S
3. M.K. Hoffman, A. Vahratian, A.C. Sciscione, J.F. Troendle, and J. Zhang Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women Obstet Gynecol 107 2006 1029 1034
4. J.C. Glantz Elective induction vs spontaneous labor: associations and outcomes J Reprod Med 50 2005 235 240
5. A.B. Caughey, J.M. Nicholson, Y.W. Cheng, D.J. Lyell, and A.E. Washington Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 2006 700 705
6. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:716-23.
7. R.A. Cole, P.W. Howie, and M.C. Macnaughton Elective induction of labor: randomized prospective trial Lancet 1 1975 767 770
8. M.E. Hannah, W.J. Hannah, J. Hellmann, S. Hewson, R. Milner, and A. Willan Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial; the Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group N Engl J Med 326 1992 1587 1592
9. A.B. Caughey, V. Sundaram, and A.J. Kaimal et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy Ann Intern Med 151 2009 252 263 W53-63
10. C.M. Koopmans, D. Bijlenga, H. Groen HYPITAT Study Group Induction of labor versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial Lancet 374 2009 979 988
11. K.E. Boers, S.M. Vijgen, D. Bijlenga DIGITAT Study Group Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomized equivalence trial (DIGITAT) BMJ 341 2010 c7087
12. S.L. Kjos, O.A. Henry, and M. Montoro Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management Am J Obstet Gynecol 169 1993 611 615
13. W.F. Rayburn, N. Sokkary, and D.E. Clokey Consequences of routine delivery at 38 weeks for A-2 gestational diabetes J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 18 2005 333 337
14. S.J. Stock, E. Ferguson, A. Duffy, I. Ford, J. Chalmers, and J.E. Norman Outcomes of elective induction of labor compared with expectant management: population based study BMJ 344 2012 e2838
15. Y.W. Cheng, A.J. Kaimal, J.M. Snowden, J.M. Nicholson, and A.B. Caughey Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 207 2012 502.e1 502.e8
16. B.G. Darney, J.M. Snowden, and Y.W. Cheng et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes Obstet Gynecol 122 2013 761 769
17. S. Osmundson, R.J. Ou-Yang, and W.A. Grobman Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix Obstet Gynecol 117 2011 583 587
18. S. Osmundson, R.J. Ou-Yang, and W.A. Grobman Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix Obstet Gynecol 116 2010 601 605
19. Consortium on Safe Labor, J.U. Hibbard, I. Wilkins, and L. Sun et al. Respiratory morbidity in late preterm births JAMA 304 2010 419 425
20. A.T. Tita, M.B. Landon, and C.Y. Spong et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes; Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network N Engl J Med 360 2009 111 120
21. U.M. Reddy, C.W. Ko, T.N. Raju, and M. Willinger Delivery indications at late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States Pediatrics 124 2009 234 240
22. J. Zhang, J. Troendle, and U.M. Reddy et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States Am J Obstet Gynecol 203 2010 326.e1 326.e10
23. J.A. Martin, B.E. Hamilton, P.D. Sutton, S.J. Ventura, F. Menacker, and S. Kirmeyer Births: final data for 2004 Natl Vital Stat Rep 55 2006 1 101
24. S.K. Laughon, J. Zhang, and J. Grewal et al. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort Am J Obstet Gynecol 206 2012 486.e1 486.e9