Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1029-1034

  Hoffman, Matthew K ^a   Vahratian, Anjel ^b   Sciscione, Anthony C ^b   Troendle, James F ^b   Zhang, Jun ^b  

^a CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

ADULT; AMNIOTOMY; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CESAREAN SECTION; DATA ANALYSIS; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR ONSET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING;

ADULT; CATHETERIZATION; CERVICAL RIPENING; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR ONSET; LABOR, INDUCED; OXYTOCICS; OXYTOCIN; PARITY; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33646809768     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000210528.32940.c6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Friedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954;68:1568-75.
2. Friedman EA. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6:567-89.
3. Friedman EA. Labor in multiparas: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1956;8:691-703.
4. Impey L, Hobson J, O'Herlihy C. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:438-43.
5. Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Hudson C, Isler CM, Larmon JE, Perry Jr K. Lack of utility of standard labor curves in the prediction of progression during labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1520-6.
6. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:824-8.
7. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM. Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:943-51.
8. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698-704.
9. Zhang J, Yancey MK, Henderson CE. U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989-1998. J Reprod Med 2002;47:120-4.
10. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:164-7.
11. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005;54:1-116.
12. Sanchez-Ramos L. Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005;32:181-200.
13. Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1690-7.
14. Smith LP, Nagourney BA, McLean FH, Usher RH. Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:579-85.
15. Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, Watts DH, Critchlow CW. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:986-94.
16. Heinberg EM, Wood RA, Chambers RB. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? J Reprod Med 2002;47:399-403.
17. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628-33.
18. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917-22.
19. Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:589-95.
20. Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:603-7.
21. Barrilleaux PS, Bofill JA, Terrone DA, Magann EF, May WL, Morrison JC. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of three techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1124-9.
22. Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP. A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1031-5.
23. Boulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001. Oxford: Update Software.