Open governance systems: Doing more with more

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2018, Pages S77-S87

  Millard, Jeremy ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Government as a platform; Open assets; Open engagement; Open governance systems; Open government; Open services; Public value

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057950081     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson, C., The Long Tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. 2006, Hyperion Books, New York.
2. Anderson, C., Makers: The new industrial revolution. 2012, Random House, New York.
3. Babu, S., Pinstrup-Andersen, P., social innovation and entrepreneurship: developing capacity to reduce poverty and hunger. von Braun, J., Vargas Hill, R., Pandya-Lorch, R., (eds.) The poorest and hungry: Assessments, analyses, and actions: An IFPRI 2020 book, 2009, 541–548.
4. Bason, C., Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. 2010, Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
5. Bevir, M., A theory of governance. 2013, University of California Press (September 2013).
6. Chesbrough, H.W., “Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology#. 2003, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
7. Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review 67:6 (2007), 1059–1066.
8. Cordella, A., Bonina, C.M., A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly 29 (2012), 512–520.
9. Defourny, J., Nyssens, M., Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1:1 (2010), 32–53.
10. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., New public management is dead: Long live digital era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, July 2006.
11. European Commission, European eGovernment 2015 Action Plan: Harnessing ICT to promote smart, sustainable & innovative government. 2010 (http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0743:FIN:EN:pdf).
12. European Commission, A vision for public services” prepared by DG CONNECT after an expert workshop and open public consultation. 2013 (http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/vision-public-services (accessed 30 January 2015)).
13. European Commission, Powering European public sector innovation: Towards a new architecture. Report of the Expert Group on Public Sector Innovation, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Union, 2013.
14. European Commission, EU anti-corruption report. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Brussels, 3.2.2014 COM(2014) 38 final, 2014 (http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/documents/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/corruption/docs/acr_2014_en.pdf).
15. European Council, Conclusions of the European Council Meeting 26-27 June 2014. General Secretariat of the Council, EUCO 79/14, Brussels, 27 June 2014, 2014.
16. Gansky, L., The mesh — why the future of business is sharing. 2010, Penguin Group, New York.
17. Gascó-Hernández, Open government: Opportunities and challenges for public governance. 2014, Springer Science + Business Media, New York.
18. Harrison, T.M., Pardo, T.A., Cook, M., Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda/future internet 2012., 4(4), 2012, 900–928.
19. Harrisson, D., Chaari, N., Comeau-Vallee, M., Intersectoral alliance and social innovation: When corporations meet civil society. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 83:1 (2012), 1–24.
20. Hood, C., A public management for all seasons. Public Administration 69:Spring (1991), 3–19.
21. IMF (International Monetary Fund), Redistribution. Inequality, and growth. IMF staff discussion note, February 2014, 2014.
22. Janssen, M., Estevez, E., Lean government and platform-based governance: Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly 30:Supplement 1 (2013), S1–S8.
23. Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., Muers, S., “Creating public value: An analytical framework for public sector reform” prepared for the UK strategy unit. 2002, Cabinet Office (October 2002).
24. Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H., An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29:Issue 4 (2012), 492–503 (October 2012).
25. Linders, Wang, Pro-active e-governance: Flipping the service delivery model in Taiwan. Published in the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2012), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 22–25 October 2013, 2013, ACM Press.
26. Mashelkar, R.A., “Organising inclusive innovation for accelerated inclusive growth” report submitted to European Commission, August 2013. 2013.
27. Mazzucato, M., The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. 2013, Anthem, London.
28. McDermott, P., Building open government. Government Information Quarterly 27:Issue 4 (2012), 401–413 (October 2010).
29. Millard, J., “EParticipation recommendations — focusing on the European level” report from the E-Participation Study (study and supply of services on the development of eParticipation in the EU), DG Information Society and Media, European Commission, July 2009. 2009.
30. Millard, J., Are you being served? Transforming e-government through service personalization. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 7(4), 2011 (October–December 2011).
31. Millard, J., Carpenter, G., Case study analysis report of online collaboration and networking tools for social innovation” a deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme. 2014, European Commission, DG Research, Brussels (http://www.tepsie.eu (accessed 30 January 2015)).
32. Moore, M.H., Creating public value: Strategic management in government. 1995, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
33. Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., Why having too little means so much. 2013, Allen Lane, Penguin Group, London.
34. Niehaves, B., Innovation processes in the public sector – New vistas for an interdisciplinary perspective on e-government research?. Electronic Government LCNS 4656 (2007), 23–34 (Springer).
35. OECD, Focus on inequality and growth. December 2014, 2014 http://www.oecd.org/social/Focus-Inequality-and-Growth-2014.pdf (accessed 30 January 2015).
36. OECD, OECD foreign bribery report: An analysis of the crime of bribery of foreign public officials. 2014 http://www.oecd.org/corruption/oecd-foreign-bribery-report-9789264226616-en.htm (accessed 30 January 2015).
37. Ormerod, P., Positive linking: How networks and incentives can revolutionise the world. 2012, Faber & Faber, London.
38. Piketty, T., Capital in the twenty-first century. 2014, Harvard University Press (translated from the French 2013 edition).
39. Pine, J., Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. 1992, Harvard Business Review Press.
40. Pine, J., Interview with Peter Day on BBC World Service GlobalBiz “mass made to order” programme, 23 November 2013. 2013.
41. Prahalad, C.K., The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. 2005, Pearson Prentice Hall, New York.
42. Prahalad, C.K., Mashelkar, R.A., Innovation's holy grail. 2010, Harvard Business Review (July 2010).
43. Rifkin, J., The zero-marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons and the eclipse of capitalism. 2014, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
44. San Francisco City Hall (2013) “A start-up called government: Our first year in retrospect“ San Francisco Mayor's Office Of Civic Innovation, (April 2013: http://innovatesf.com/2012Retrospective.pdf (accessed 30 January 2015)).
45. Simanis, E., Hart, S., The base of the pyramid protocol: Toward next generation BoP strategy. 2nd ed., 2008, Cornell University, Ithaca.
46. Soares, C., Clara, M., Social innovation: Tackling poverty through social change. 2012, SCIDEV ((July 25). Download from: http://www.scidev.net/en/science-and-innovation-policy/innovation-policy/opinions/social-innovation-tackling-poverty-through-social-change.html (accessed 30 January 2015)).
47. Stoker, G., Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance?. The American Review of Public Administration 3:1 (2006), 41–57.
48. Tepsie, Research programme synthesis report: Final reports for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission — 7th Framework. 2014, European Commission, DG Research, Brussels (http://www.tepsie.eu (accessed 30 January 2015)).
49. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R., Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. 2008, Yale University Press.
50. United Nations, Realizing the future we want for all. The UN Task Team Report, 2013 (http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/untaskteam_undf/report.shtml (accessed 30 January 2015)).
51. United Nations, Governance, public administration and information technology for post-2015 development” discussion and findings of the Expert Group Meeting in Geneva, July 2013. 2013 (http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/Governance:PA_Report.pdf (accessed 30 January 2015)).
52. United Nations, E-government survey 2014– E-government for the people. 2014, United Nations Department of Social and Economic Affairs, New York.
53. Van Veenstra, A.F., Janssen, M., Investigating out-comes of T-government using a public value management approach. Scholl, H.J., et al. (eds.) IFIP EGOV 2012, springer LNCS 7443, 2012, Kristiansand, Norway, 187–197.
54. Weerakkody, V., Dhillon, G., Moving from E-government to T-government: A study of process re-engineering challenges in a UK local authority perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 4:4 (2008), 1–16.
55. Wilkinson, R., The impact of inequality: How to make sick societies healthier. 2005, The New Press, New York.
56. Wilkinson, P., Pickett, K., The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. 2009, Allen Lane Press, Penguin Group, London.
57. World Bank, Getting on the map: A community's path to better services. 2012, Open Development Technology Alliance (www.worldbank.org/socialdevelopment).
58. World Bank, Amplifying citizen voices through technology. 2013 http://odta.net/post/call-for-feedback-amplifying-citizen-voices-through-technology-0 (accessed September 2013).