Acoustic noise and magnetic resonance procedures

Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Health Effects and Safety

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 115-138

  McJury, Mark ^a  

^a WESTON PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057373066     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Brummett, R. E., Talbot, J. M., and Charuhas, P, Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging, Radiology, 169, 539, 1988.
2. Quirk, M. E., Letendre, A. J., Ciottone, R. A., and Lingley, J. F, Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging, Radiology, 170, 464, 1989.
3. Laurell, G, The combined effect of noise and cisplatin, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 1001, 969, 1992.
4. Philbin, M. K., Taber, K. H., and Hayman, L. A, Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR, Am. J. Neuroradiol., 17, 1033-1036, 1996.
5. Kanal, E., Shellock, F. G., and Talagala, L, Safety considerations in MR imaging, Radiology, 176, 593, 1990.
6. Shellock, F. G. and Kanal, E., Policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management, J. Magn. Reson. Imag., 1, 97, 1991.
7. Shellock, F. G., Litwer, C. A., and Kanal, E, Magnetic resonance imaging: bioeffects, safety, and patient management, Rev. Magn. Reson. Med., 4, 21, 1992.
8. Kanal, E., Shellock, F. G., and Sonnenblick, D., MRI clinical site safety survey: phase I results and preliminary data (abstr.), Magn. Reson. Imag., 7, 106, 1988.
9. Strainer, J. C., Ulmer, J. L., Yetkin, F. Z., Haughton, V. M., Daniels, D. L., and Millen, S. J., Functional MR of the primary auditory cortex: an analysis of pure tone activation and tone discrimination, Am. J. Roentgenol., 18, 601, 1997.
10. Ulmer, J. L., Biswal, B. B., Mark, L. P., Mathews, V. P., Prost, R., Millen, S., Garman, J. N., and Horzewski, D, Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 22, 480, 1998.
11. Bandettini, P. A., Jesmanowicz, A., Van Kylen, J., Birn, R. A., and Hyde, J., Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise, Magn. Reson. Med., 39, 410, 1998.
12. Bess, F. H. and Humes, L. E., Audiology, the Fundamentals, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1995.
13. Department of Health, Acoustics: Design Considerations, HTM 2045, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1996.
14. Hetu, R., Laroche, C., Quoc, H. T., LePage, B., and St. Vincent, J, The spectrum of impulse noise and the human ear response, in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, Dancer, A.L., Henderson, D., Salvi, R.J., and Hamernik, R.P., Eds., Mosby, St. Louis, 1992, p. 361.
15. Alberti, P, Noise and the ear, in Adult Audiology, Stephens, D., Ed., Butterworths, London, 1987.
16. Mills, J. H, Effects of noise on auditory sensitivity, psychophysical tuning curves and suppression, in New Perspectives on Noise Induced Hearing Loss, Hamernik, R.P., Henderson, D., and Salvi, R., Eds., Raven Press, New York, 1982.
17. Goldman, A. M., Gossman, W. E., and Friedlander, P. C, Reduction of sound levels with antinoise in MR imaging, Radiology, 173, 549, 1989.
18. Hurwitz, R., Lane, S. R., Bell, R. A., and Brant-Zawadzki, M.N, Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging, Radiology, 173, 545, 1989.
19. Shellock, F. G., Morisoli, S. M., and Ziarati, M, Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging:evaluation of six “worst-case” pulse sequences, Radiology, 191, 91, 1994.
20. McJury, M., Blug, A., Joerger, C., Condon, B., and Wyper, D, Acoustic noise levels during magnetic resonance imaging scanning at 1.5 T, Br. J. Radiol., 64, 413, 1994.
21. McJury, M. J, Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging, Clin. Radiol., 50, 331, 1995.
22. Counter, S. A., Olofsson, A., Grahn, H. F., and Borg, E., MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis, J. Magn. Reson. Imag., 7, 606, 1997.
23. Hedeen, R. A. and Edelstein, W. A, Characteristics and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers, Magn. Reson. Med., 37, 7, 1997.
24. Cho, Z. H., Park, S. H., Kim, J. H., Chung, S. C., Chung, S. T., Chung, J. Y., Moon, C. W., Yi, J. H., and Wong, E. K, Analysis of acoustic noise in MRI, Magn. Reson. Imag., 15, 815, 1997.
25. Shellock, F. G., Ziarati, M., Atkinson, D., and Chen, D. Y, Determination of gradient magnetic fieldinduced acoustic noise associated with the use of echo planar and three-dimensional fast spin echo techniques, J. Magn. Reson. Imag., 8, 1154, 1998.
26. Glover, P., Hykin, J., Gowland, P., Wright, J., Johnson, J., and Mansfield, P. M, An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging, Br. J. Radiol., 68, 1090, 1995.
27. Miyati, T., Banno, T., Fujita, H., Mase, M., Narita, H., Imazawa, I., and Ohuba, S, Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multi-center trial and comparison with other pulse sequences, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 18, 773, 1999.
28. Bowtell, R. W. and Peters, A, Analytic approach to the design of transverse gradient coils with coaxial return paths, Magn. Reson. Med., 41, 600, 1999.
29. Sellers, M. B., Pavlids, J. D., and Carlberger, T., MRI acoustic noise, Int. J. Neuroradiol., 2, 549, 1996.
30. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Magnetic resonance diagnostic device: panel recommendation and report on petitions for MR reclassification, Fed. Regist., 53, 7575, 1988.
31. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Occupational Noise Exposure, 29 C.F.R., pt. 1910.95, 1988.
32. International Electrotechnical Commission, Particular Requirements for the Safety of Magnetic Resonance Equipment for Medical Diagnosis, IEC Standard, 601-2-33, 1, 1995.
33. Department of Health, Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Equipment in Clinical Use, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1993.
34. British Standards Institute, Specification for Magnetic Resonance Equipment for Medical Diagnosis, British Standard, 5724, section 2.33, 1996.
35. Naughton, R.F, The measurement of hearing by bone conduction, in Modern Developments in Audiology, Jerger, J., Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1963.
36. McJury, M., Stewart, R.W., Crawford, D., and Toma, E, The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results, Magn. Reson. Imag., 15, 319, 1997.
37. Chen, C. K., Chiueh, T. D., and Chen, J. H, Active cancellation system of acoustic noise in MR imaging, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 46, 186, 1999.
38. Lueg, P, Process of silencing sound oscillations, U.S. Patent 2,043,416, 1936.
39. Chaplain, G. B. B, Anti-noise: the Essex breakthrough, Chart. Mech. Eng., 30, 41, 1983.
40. Elliot, S. J. and Nelson, P. A, The acoustic control of sound, Electr. Comm. Eng J., 2, 127, 1990.
41. Skare, S., Nordell, B., Jakobeeus, C., Mosskin, M., Blennow, M., and Flodmark, O, An incubator and ‘quiet’ pulse sequences for MRI examination of premature neonates, Proc. Soc. Magn. Reson., 1727, 1996.
42. Hennel, F., Giard, F., and Loenneker, T., ‘Silent’ MRI with soft gradient pulses, Magn. Reson. Med., 42, 6, 1999.
43. Jakob, P. M., Schlaug, G., Griswold, M., Lovblad, K. O., Thomas, R., Ives, J. R., Matheson, J. K., and Edelman, R. R, Functional burst imaging, Magn. Reson. Med., 40, 614, 1998.
44. Cremillieux, Y., Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A., Briguet, A., and Doran, S. J., STEAM-Burst: a single-shot multi-slice imaging sequence without rapid gradient switching, Magn. Reson. Med., 38, 645, 1997.
45. Hennig, J. and Hodapp, M, Burst imaging, MAGMA, 1, 39, 1993.
46. Frahm, J., Merboldt, K., Hanicke, W., and Haase, A, Stimulated echo imaging, J. Magn. ResonImag., 64, 81, 1985.
47. Cho, Z. H., Chung, S. T., Chung, J.Y., Park, S. H., Kim, J. S., Moon, C. H., and Hong, I. K., A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient, Magn. Reson. Med., 39, 317, 1998.
48. Lauterbur, P.C, Image formation by induced local interactions: example employing nuclear magnetic resonance, Nature, 242, 190, 1973.
49. Mansfield, P.M., Glover, P. M., and Bowtell, R.W, Active acoustic screening: design principles for quiet gradient coils in MRI, Meas. Sci. Technol., 5, 1021, 1994.
50. Bowtell, R. W. and Mansfield, P. M, Quiet transverse gradient coils: Lorentz force balancing designs using geometric similitude, Magn. Reson. Med., 34, 494, 1995.
51. Mansfield, P. M., Glover, P. M., and Beaumont, J, Sound generation in gradient coil structures for MRI, Magn. Reson. Med., 39, 539, 1998.
52. Mulholland, K. A, Noise control, in The Noise Handbook, Tempest W., Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1985, p. 282.
53. Roschmann, P, Human auditory system responses to radio frequency energy in RF coils for magnetic resonance at 2.4 to 170 MHz, Magn. Reson. Med., 21, 197, 1991.
54. Elder, J.A, Special senses, in Biological Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation, EPA-600/8-83-026F, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Effects Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1984, p. 570.
55. Postow, E. and Swicord, M. L, Modulated fields and “window” effects, in CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Polk, C. and Postow, E., Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1989, p. 425.