Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis

EMNLP 2017 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 2727-2736

  Luo, Bingfeng ^a   Feng, Yansong ^a   Xu, Jianbo ^b   Zhang, Xiang ^b   Zhao, Dongyan ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Key Laboratory of Regional Climate Environment Research for Temperature East Asia the Institute of   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CRIMINAL CASE; EXPRESSION STYLES; FACT DESCRIPTIONS; FULL MODEL; NEURAL NETWORK METHOD; PREDICTION TASKS; UNIFIED FRAMEWORK; USER INPUT;

FORECASTING;

EID: 85057347230     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d17-1289     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Nikolaos Aletras, Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis, Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro, and Vasileios Lampos. 2016. Predicting judicial decisions of the european court of human rights: A natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2:e93.
2. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In Proceedings of ICLR.
3. Danilo S Carvalho, Minh-Tien Nguyen, Tran Xuan Chien, and Minh Le Nguyen. 2016. Lexical-morphological modeling for legal text analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.00799.
4. Yen-Liang Chen, Yi-Hung Liu, and Wu-Liang Ho. 2013. A text mining approach to assist the general public in the retrieval of legal documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2):280–290.
5. Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merrienboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1724–1734.
6. Thorsten Joachims. 2002. Learning to classify text using support vector machines: Methods, theory and algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Daniel Martin Katz, II Bommarito, J Michael, and Josh Blackman. 2016. A general approach for predicting the behavior of the supreme court of the united states. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03473.
8. Mi-Young Kim, Randy Goebe, and Ken Satoh. 2014a. COLIEE-14. http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~miyoung2/jurisin_ task/index.html.
9. Mi-Young Kim, Ying Xu, and Randy Goebel. 2014b. Legal question answering using ranking svm and syntactic/semantic similarity. In JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, pages 244–258. Springer.
10. Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings EMNLP, pages 1746–1751.
11. Gakuto Kurata, Bing Xiang, and Bowen Zhou. 2016. Improved neural network-based multi-label classification with better initialization leveraging label co-occurrence. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 521–526.
12. Wan-Chen Lin, Tsung-Ting Kuo, and Tung-Jia Chang. 2012. Exploiting machine learning models for chinese legal documents labeling, case classification, and sentencing prediction. ROCLING XXIV (2012), page 140.
13. Chao-Lin Liu, Cheng-Tsung Chang, and Jim-How Ho. 2004. Case instance generation and refinement for case-based criminal summary judgments in chinese. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 20(4):783–800.
14. Chao-Lin Liu and Chwen-Dar Hsieh. 2006. Exploring phrase-based classification of judicial documents for criminal charges in chinese. In International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pages 681–690. Springer.
15. Chao-Lin Liu and Ting-Ming Liao. 2005. Classifying criminal charges in chinese for web-based legal services. In Asia-Pacific Web Conference, pages 64–75. Springer.
16. Yi-Hung Liu, Yen-Liang Chen, and Wu-Liang Ho. 2015. Predicting associated statutes for legal problems. Information Processing & Management, 51(1):194–211.
17. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Proceedings of NIPS, pages 3111–3119.
18. Jinseok Nam, Jungi Kim, Eneldo Loza Mencía, Iryna Gurevych, and Johannes Fürnkranz. 2014. Large-scale multi-label text classification—revisiting neural networks. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 437–452. Springer.
19. K Raghav, P Krishna Reddy, and V Balakista Reddy. 2016. Analyzing the extraction of relevant legal judgments using paragraph-level and citation information. AI4J–Artificial Intelligence for Justice, page 30.
20. Duyu Tang, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2015. Document modeling with gated recurrent neural network for sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1422–1432.
21. Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Tim Lillicrap, Daan Wierstra, et al. 2016. Matching networks for one shot learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3630–3638.
22. Sida Wang and Christopher D Manning. 2012. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers-Volume 2, pages 90–94. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Zichao Yang, Diyi Yang, Chris Dyer, Xiaodong He, Alex Smola, and Eduard Hovy. 2016. Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.