Requisites for Curricular Reform

Middle School Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 68-71

  Erb, Thomas O ^a   Stevenson, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057135804     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23276223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00940771.1998.11494577     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arnold, J., (1991). Towards a middle school curriculum rich in meaning. Middle School Journal, 23(2), 8–12.
2. Beane, J. A., (1993). A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
3. Brazee, E. N., & Capelluti, J., (1995). Dissolving boundaries: Toward an integrative curriculum. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
4. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: The Carnegie Corporation.
5. Doll, R. C., (1989). Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
6. Eisner, E. W., (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
7. Felner, R. D., (1997). High performance learning community assessments: School improvement self-study 1997–1998. Providence. RI: National Center on Public Education and Social Policy, University of Rhode Island.
8. Felner, R.D., Jackson, A.W., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N., (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years: Longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points-based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 528–532, 541–550.
9. Hackmann, D. G., & Valentine, J. W., (1998). Designing an effective middle level schedule. Middle School Journal, 29(5), 3–13.
10. Lipsitz, J., (1984). Successful schools for young adolescents. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
11. McNeil, J. D., (1996). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction (5th ed.). new York: Harper Collins.
12. National' Middle School Association. (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle level schools. Columbus, OH: Author.
13. Nolan, F., (1998). Ability grouping plus heterogeneous grouping: Win-win schedules. Middle School Journal, 29(5), 14–19.
14. Oliva, P. F., (1997). Developing the curriculum (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
15. Seed, A., (1998). Free at last: Making the most of the flexible block schedule. Middle School Journal, 29(5), 20–21.
16. Smith, D. D., Pitkin, N., & Rettig, M. D., (1998). Flexing the middle school block schedule by adding non-traditional core subjects and teachers to the interdisciplinary team. Middle School Journal, 29(5), 22–27.
17. Stevenson, C., & Erb, T. O., (1998). How implementing Turning Points improves students outcomes. Middle School Journal, 30(1), 49–52.
18. Sullivan, K., (1996). Middle school program and participatory planning drive school design. Middle School Journal, 27(4), 3–7.
19. Vars, G. F., (1993). Interdisciplinary teaching: Why and how? Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.