Skin tests

The Science of Hair Care

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 493-510

  Wilkinson, J D ^a   Shaw, S ^a  

^a AMERSHAM HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056957114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Menné T, Wahlberg JE. Risk assessment of chemicals commonly used in consumer products. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47: 1-3.
2. Robinson MK, Gerberick CF, Ryan CA, McNamee P, White IR, Basketter D. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 45: 251-259.
3. Basketter DA, Gerberick CF, Kimber I, Willis C. The Toxicology of Contact Dermatitis. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, 1999: 39-56.
4. Holland G, York M, Basketter DA. Irritant-corrosive materials, oxidising/reducing agents, acids and alkalis, concentrated salt solutions etc. In: Maibach HI, Coenraads PJ, eds. Irritant Contact Dermatitis Syndrome. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1995: 55-64.
5. Draize JH, Woodward G, Calvery HO. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82: 377-390.
6. Marzulli FN, Maibach HI. The rabbit as a model for evaluating skin irritants: a comparison of results obtained on animal and man using repeated skin exposures. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1975; 13: 533-540.
7. Walker AP, Basketter DA, Baverel M, Diembeck W, Mathies W, Mougin D, Paye M, Rothlisburger R, Dupuis J. Test guidance for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man. Food Chem Toxicol 1996; 34: 551-560.
8. Wigger-Alberti W, Hinnen U, Elsner P. Predictive testing of metalworking fluids: a comparison of 2 cumulative human irritation models and correlation with epidemiological data. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36: 14-20.
9. Hannuksela A, Hannuksela M. Irritant effects of a detergent in wash and chamber tests. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32: 163-166.
10. Malten KE. Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1981; 7: 238-247.
11. Jackson EM. Prognostic patch testing: the other kind of patch test. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 237-239.
12. Tupkner RA, Schuur J, Coenraads PJ. Irritancy of antiseptics tested by repeated open exposures on the human skin, evaluated by non-invasive methods. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 213-217.
13. Sosckin D, Kligman AM. Adverse subjective responses. In: Kligman AM, Leyden JJ, eds. Safety and Efficacy of Topical Drugs and Cosmetics. Chapter 25. New York: Grune & Statton, 1982: 377-388.
14. Willis CM, Shaw S, de Lacharriere O, Baverel M, Reiche L, Jourdan R, Bastier P, Wilkinson JD. Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145: 258-263.
15. Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Wilson D. Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation. Dermatosen 1988; 36: 45-49.
16. Issachar N, Gall Y, Borrel MT, Poelman MC. Correlation between percutaneous penetration of methyl nicotinate and sensitive skin, using laser Doppler imaging. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 182-186.
17. Magnussen B, Kligman AM. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1970.
18. Buehler EV. Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol 1965; 91: 171-177.
19. Gad SC, Dunn BJ, Dobbs DW, Reilly C, Walsh RD. Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986; 84: 93-114.
20. Kimber I, Basketter DA. Contact sensitization: a new approach to risk assessment. Human Ecol Risk Assess 1997; 3: 385-395.
21. Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Scholes EW, Basketter DA. The local lymph node assay: development and applications. Toxicology 1997; 93: 13-31.
22. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Lea LJ, Basketter DA. Local lymph node assay validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2000; 11: 13-18.
23. Lahti A, Maibach HI. Species specificity of non-immunological contact urticaria: guinea pig, rat and mouse. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 13: 66.
24. Flyvhom MA, Hall BM, Agner T, Tiedemann E, Greenhill P, Vanderveken W, Freeberg FE, Menné T. Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch tests in formaldehyde sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application tests. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36: 26-33.
25. Menné T. Relationship between use test and threshold patch test concentration in patients sensitive to 5-chloro-2-methyl-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MCI/MI). Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 375.
26. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Camarasa JG, Lachapelle J-M, Lahti A, Menné T, Wilkinson JD. Testing with fragrance mix. Is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32: 266-272.
27. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Menné T. Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 414-418.
28. Rees JL, Friedman PS, Mathews JW. The influence of area of application on sensitization by dinitrochlorobenzene. Br J Dermatol 1990; 122: 29-31.
29. Upadhye MR, Maibach HI. Influence of area of application of allergen on sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 27: 281-286.
30. Liden C, Menné T, Burrows D. Nickel-containing alloys and platings and their ability to cause dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134: 193-198.
31. Hannuksela M, Salo H. The repeat open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14: 221-227.
32. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Rastogi SC, Menné T. Threshold responses in cinnamic aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 165-171.
33. Nakada T, Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Use tests: ROAT (repeat open application test)/PUT (provocative uses test); an overview. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 43: 1-3.
34. Frosch PJ, Hannuksela M, Andersen KE, Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Lachapelle J-M. CMI/MI use test with a shampoo on patch test positive patients. Results of a multicentre double-blind crossover trial. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 333-343.
35. Nielsen NH, Menné T, Kristiansen J, Christensen JM, Borg L, Poulsen LK. Effects of repeated skin exposure to low nickel concentrations-a model for allergic contact dermatitis to nickel on the hands. Br J Dermatol 1995; 141: 676-682.
36. Kristiansen J, Christensen JM, Henriksen T, Menné T. Determination of nickel in finger nails and forearm skin (stratum corneum). Anal Chim Acta 1999; 403: 265-272.
37. Menné T. Allergic contact dermatitis in man. Experimental and quantitative aspects. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Le Poitevin J-P, eds. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001: 246.
38. Kimber I, Pichowski JS, Basketter DA, Dearman RJ. Immune responses to contact allergens and novel approaches to hazard evaluation. Toxicol Lett 1999; 106: 239-248.
39. Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnussen B, Bandman H-J, Calnan CD, Cronin E, Hjorth N, Maibach HI, Malten KE, Meneghini CL, Pirilä V. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1970; 50: 282-292.
40. Brasch J, Heuscher T, Aberer W, Baverle G, Frosch PJ, Fuchs T, Funstuck V, Kaiser G, Lischka GG, Pilz B, Saver C, Schuer B, Szliska C. Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicentre study of synchronous left versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31: 584-591.
41. Fischer T, Maibach HI. Easier patch testing with True test. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 20: 447-453.
42. Reitschel R, Adams RM, Maibach HI, Storrs FJ, Rosenthal CE. The case for patch test readings beyond day 2. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988; 18: 42-45.
43. De Groot AC. Patch Testing. Test Concentrations and Vehicles for 3700 chemicals. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.
44. Bruynzeel DP, Andersen KE, Camarasa JG, Lachapelle J-M, Menné T, White IR. The European standard series. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 145-148.
45. Lachapelle J-M, Ale SI, Freeman S, Frosch PJ, Goh CL, Hannuksela M, Hayakawa R, Maibach HI, Wahlberg JE. Proposal for a reviewed international standard series of patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36: 121-123.
46. Cronin E. Contact Dermatitis. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1980.
47. Wahlberg JE. Identification of new allergens and non-irritant patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 155-156.
48. Fregert S. Publication of allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 12: 123-124.
49. Lachapelle J-M. A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: practical implications and limitations. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36: 39-43.
50. Burrows D, Andersen KE, Camarasa JG, Dooms-Goossens A, Ducombs G, Lachapelle J-M, Menné T, Rycroft RJ, Wahlberg JE, White IR. Trial of 0.5% versus 0.37% potassium dichromate. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21: 351.
51. McLelland J, Shuster S, Mathews JNS. “Irritants” increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1991; 127: 1016-1019.
52. Skog E. Simultaneous flare-up reactions induced by different amounts of 1,3-dinitrochlorobenzene. Acta Derm Venereol 1976; 46: 386-395.
53. Scheper RJ, von Bloomberg BME, Boerrigter GH, Bruynzeel DP, Van Dither A, Vos A. Induction of local memory in the skin. Role of local T cell retention. Clin Exp Immunol 1983; 51: 141-148.
54. Hindsen M, Christiensen OB. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions following allergic and irritant inflammation. Acta Derm Venereol 1992; 72: 220-221.
55. Natada T, Hostyneck JJ, Maibach HI. Use tests: ROAT 9 repeated open application test)/PUT (provocation use test): an overview. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 45: 1-3.
56. Nater JP, Weyland JW, de Groot AC. Unwanted Effects of Cosmetics and Drugs Used in Dermatology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994: 136-154.
57. Wilkinson DS. Patch test reactions to certain halogenated salicylanilides. Br J Dermatol 1962; 74: 302-306.
58. Cronin E. Photoallergy to musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 11: 82-92.
59. Thune P, Jansen C, Wennersten G, Rystedt I, Brodthagen H, McFadden N. The Scandinavian multicentre photopatch study (1980-1985)-final report. Photobiology 1987; 5: 261-269.
60. Holzle E, Plewig G, Lehmann P. Photodermatoses-diagnostic procedures and their interpretation. Photodermatology 1987; 4: 109-114.
61. Ibbotson SH, Farr PM, Beck MH, Diffey BL, Ferguson J, George SA, Green C, du P Menage H, Murphy GM, Norris PG, Rhodes LE, White IR. Photopatch testing: methods and indications. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 371-376.
62. Vennerstein G, Thune P, Jansen CT, Brodthagen H. Photocontact dermatitis: current status with emphasis on allergic contact photosensitivity (CPS) occurrence, allergens and practical phototesting. Semin Dermatol 1986; 5: 227-289.
63. English JSC, White IR, Cronin E. Sensitivity to sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 17: 159-162.
64. Takashima A, Yamatoto K, Kimura S, Takakuwa Y, Mizuno N. Allergic contact and photocontact dermatitis due to psoralens in patients with psoriasis treated with topical PUVA. Br J Dermatol 1991; 124: 37-42.
65. Dahlquist I, Fregert S, Gruvberger B. A simple method for the detection of formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 1982; 3: 301-303.
66. Shore N. Dimethylglyoxime stick test for easier detection of nickel. Arch Dermatol 1977; 113: 1734.
67. Gruvebereger B, Bruze M, Fregert S. Spot tests and chemical analyses for allergen evaluation. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Frosch PJ, Lepoitevin J-P, eds. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2001: 497-510.
68. Lahti A. Non-immunologic contact urticaria. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980; 60(suppl 91): 1-49.
69. Tosti A, Guerra L. Protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 19: 149.
70. Lahti A. Immediate contact reactions. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, LePoitevin J-P, eds. Text Book of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 62-74.
71. Hannuksela M. Skin tests for immediate hypersensitivity. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, LePoitevin J-P, eds. Text Book of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 287-292.
72. Larmi E, Lahti A, Hannuksela M. Immediate contact reactions to benzoic acid and the sodium salt of pyrrolidone carboxylic acid. Comparison of various skin sites. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 38-40.
73. Ylipieti S, Lahti A. Effect of the vehicle on non-immunologic immediate contact reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21: 105-106.
74. Rancé F, Juchet A, Bremond F, Datau G. Correlations between skin prick tests using commercial extracts and fresh foods, specific IgE and food challenges. Allergy 1997; 52: 1031-1035.
75. Morren M-A, Janssens V, Dooms-Goossens A, van Hoyeveld E, Cornelis A, de Wolf-peters C, Heremeus A. α-Amylase, a flour additive: an important cause of protein contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 29: 723-728.
76. Susitaival P, Husman K, Husman L, Hollman A, Horsemanheimo M, Hannuksela M, Notkola V. Hand dermatitis in dairy farmers. In: McDuffie HH, Dosman Ja A, Seschuk KM, Olenchock SA, Sendhillselvan A, eds. Human Sustainability in Agriculture: Health, Safety, Environment. Chelsea: Lewis, 1994.
77. Basomber A, Sastre A, Pelaez A, Romar A, Campos A, Garcia-Villamanzo A. Standardisation of the prick test. A comparative study of three methods. Allergy 1985; 40: 395-399.