An ACT-R approach to closing the loop on computational cognitive modeling: Describing dynamics of interactive decision making and attention allocation

Human Performance Modeling in Aviation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 77-104

  Byrne, Michael D ^a   Kirlik, Alex ^b   Fleetwood, Michael D ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056949887     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Quin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Baron, S. (1984). A control theoretic approach to modeling human supervisory control of dynamic systems. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Advances in man–machine systems research (Vol. 2, pp. 1–47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In J. S. Bruner, E. Brunswik, L. Festinger, F. Heider, K. F. Muenzinger, C. E. Osgood, & D. Rapaport (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41–69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprinted in Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given (pp. 218–238). New York: Norton.
6. Byrne, M. D. (2003). Cognitive architecture. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human– computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 97–117). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Byrne, M. D., & Gray, W. D. (2003). Returning human factors to an engineering discipline: Expanding the science base through a new generation of quantitative methods—. Preface to the special section. Human Factors, 45, 1–4.
8. Byrne, M. D., & Kirlik, A. (2004). Integrated modeling of cognition and the information environment: A multilevel investigation (process and product modeling) of attention allocation to visual displays (Tech. rep. AHFD-04-14/NASA-04-4). Savoy: University of Illinois, Human Factors Division.
9. Byrne, M. D., & Kirlik, A. (2005). Using computational cognitive modeling to diagnose possible sources of aviation error. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15, 135–155.
10. Cassell, R., Smith, A., & Hicok, D. (1999). Development of airport surface required navigation performance (RNP) (NASA/CR-1999-20910).
11. Cheng, V. H. L., Sharma, V., & Foyle, D. C. (2001). A study of aircraft taxi performance for enhancing airport surface traffic control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2(2), 39–54.
12. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
13. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.
14. Gluck, K. A., & Pew, R. W. (2005). Modeling human behavior with integrated cognitive architectures: Comparison, evaluation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Goodman, A. (2001). Taxi navigation errors: Taxiway geometry analyses. Unpublished report.
16. Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. R. (2001). The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Hooey, B. L., & Foyle, D. C. (2006). Pilot navigation errors on the airport surface: Identifying contributing factors and mitigating solutions. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16, 51–76.
18. Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., & Andre, A. D. (2000). Integration of cockpit displays for surface operations: The final stage of a human-centered design approach. SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 109, 1053–1065.
19. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Jagacinski, R., & Flach, J. (2002) Control theory for humans. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence. Erlbaum Associates.
21. Keller, J. W., Leiden, K., & Small, R. (2003). Cognitive task analysis of commercial jet aircraft pilots during instrument approaches for baseline and synthetic vision displays. In D. C. Foyle, A. Goodman, & B. L. Hooey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 NASA Aviation Safety Program Conference on Human Performance Modeling of Approach and Landing with Augmented Displays (NASA/CP-2003-212267). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
22. Kirlik, A. (2003). Human factors distributes its workload. Review of E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research, Vol. 1. Contemporary Psychology, 48(6), 766–769.
23. Kirlik, A. (2006). Adaptive perspectives on human–technology interaction: Methods and models for cognitive engineering and human–computer interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Kirlik, A., & Bisantz, A. (1998). Cognition in human–machine systems: Experiential and environmental components of adaptation. In P. Hancock (Ed.), Human performance and ergonomics (pp. 47–68). New York: Academic Press.
25. Kirlik, A., Miller, R. A., & Jagacinski, R. J. (1993). Supervisory control in a dynamic uncertain environment: A process model of skilled human–environment interaction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(4), 929–952.
26. Klein, G. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Advances in man– machine systems research (Vol. 5, pp. 47–92). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. MacKenzie, I. S. (2003). Motor behavior models for human–computer interaction. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Toward a multidisciplinary science of human–computer interaction (pp. 27–54). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. (2001). Preferential choice and adaptive strategy use. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 123–146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Rasmussen, J. (1976). Outlines of a hybrid model of the process plant operator. In T. B. Sheridan & G. Johannsen (Eds.), Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. (pp. 371–383). New York: Plenum Press.
30. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 257–266.
31. Rouse, W. B. (1984), Advances in man–machine systems research (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32. Salvucci, D. D. (2001). Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: An integrated model approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 55, 85–107.
33. Senders, J. (1964). The human operator as a monitor and controller of multidegree of freedom systems. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-5, 2–6.
34. Sheridan, T. B. (1976). Toward a general model of supervisory control. In T. B. Sheridan & G. Johansen (Eds.), Monitoring behavior and supervisory control (pp. 271–282). New York: Plenum Press.
35. Sheridan, T. B., & Johannsen, G. (1976). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. New York: Plenum Press.
36. Tolman, E. C., & Brunswik, E. (1935). The organism and the causal texture of the environment. Psychological Review, 42, 43–77.
37. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3(2), 159–177.