Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: A prospective exploratory study

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Bramer, Wichor M ^a   Giustini, Dean ^b   Kleijnen, Jos ^c,d   Franco, Oscar H ^a,e  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c KLEIJNEN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS LTD   (United Kingdom)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bibliographic; Databases; Information storage and retrieval; Review literature as topic; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

EMBASE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LINGUISTICS; MEDLINE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECALL; REVIEW; SCIENTIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WEB OF SCIENCE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; DOCUMENTATION; PROCEDURES; SEARCH ENGINE;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEARCH ENGINE; SUBJECT HEADINGS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85056802533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0864-9     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Sampson M, Tetzlaff J, Urquhart C. Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross-sectional sample. Res Synth Methods. 2011;2(2):119-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.42.
2. Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking. Syst Rev. 2015;4:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7.
3. Sampson M, Barrowman NJ, Moher D, Klassen TP, Pham B, Platt R, et al. Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(10):943-55.
4. Topfer LA, Parada A, Menon D, Noorani H, Perras C, Serra-Prat M. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15(2):297-303.
5. Harping P. Introduction to controlled vocabularies terminology for art, architecture, and other cultural works; terminology. Los Angeles: Getty Trust Publ; 2013.
6. Embase Indexing Guide 2015: a comprehensive guide to Embase indexing policy 2015. http://supportcontent.elsevier.com/Support%20Hub/Embase/Files%20&%20Attachements/4683-Embase%20indexing%20guide%202015.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
7. Jenuwine ES, Floyd JA. Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and text-word searches in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on sleep in healthy individuals. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004;92(3):349-53.
8. Elsevier R&D Solutions. A comparison of Emtree® and MeSH® - Whitepaper. 2015. http://supportcontent.elsevier.com/Support%20Hub/Embase/Files%20&%20Attachements/4685-Embase-White%20Paper-Comparison%20of%20Emtree%20and%20MeSH-July%202015.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2015.
9. Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Can Fam Physician. 2005;51(JUNE):848-9.
10. Elsevier. Embase Indexing Guide 2015: a comprehensive guide to Embase indexing policy 2015. http://supportcontent.elsevier.com/Support%20Hub/Embase/Files%20&%20Attachements/4683-Embase%20indexing%20guide%202015.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
11. Hausner E, Simon M, Kaiser T. Focus EMTREE terms vs. non-focused EMTREE terms to search for clinical drug trials in EMBASE 2008. http://abstracts.cochrane.org/2008-freiburg/focus-emtree-terms-vs-non-focused-emtree-terms-search-clinical-drug-trials-embase. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
12. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Pruning Emtree: does focusing Embase Subject Headings impact search strategy precision and sensitivity? 2015. https://www.cadth.ca/pruning-emtree-embase. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
13. Duffy S, Ross J, Misso K, de Kock S, Noake C, Stirk L. Is it possible to focus EMTREE without loss of sensitivity when searching Embase for systematic reviews? Analysis of Cochrane Reviews and HTA reports. EAHIL Conference; 6-11 Jun 2016; Seville, Spain2016.
14. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BMR. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7.
15. Clarivate Analytics. EndNote X7. 2015. https://www.endnote.com. Accessed 22 Nov 2018.
16. National Library of Medicine. MeSH database. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.
17. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. J Med Lib Assoc. 2018;106(4):531-541.
18. Bramer WM, Milic J, Mast F. Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote. J Med Lib Assoc. 2017;105(1):84-87.