Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using endnote

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 84-87

  Bramer, Wichor M ^a   Milic, Jelena ^a   Mast, Frans ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LITERATURE;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 85012113078     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2017.111     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Lorenzetti D, Ghali W. Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an exploration of usage and usability. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):141.
2. VonVille HM. Excel workbooks for systematic reviews & corresponding handouts [Internet]. University of Texas [cited 19 Apr 2016]. .
3. King R, Hooper B, Wood W. Using bibliographic software to appraise and code data in educational systematic review research. Med Teacher. 2011;33(9):719–23.
4. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley Online Library; 2008.
5. Wang Z, Asi N, Elraiyah TA, Abu Dabrh AM, Undavalli C, Glasziou P, Montori V, Murad MH. Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1353–7.
6. Shemilt I, Khan N, Park S, Thomas J. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5(1):1–13.
7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006–12.