Translation quality assessment: An argumentation-centred approach

Translation Quality Assessment: An Argumentation-Centred Approach

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-188

  Williams, Malcolm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056335429     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (146)

1. Canada. Translation Bureau. 1978. La traduction au service de l'état et du pays. Doctrine, conception générale et méthode. Ottawa.
2. Canada. Translation Bureau. 1986. Quality Standards. Management News, 9: 4
3. Canada. Translation Bureau. Translation Operations Branch. 1990. Strategies 1991-94. Toward 1994: The Challenge of Quality. Hull, Quebec.
4. Canada. Translation Bureau.Terminology and Linguistic Services Directorate. 1993. Contrôle de la qualité des traductions. Cahier d'information. Hull, Quebec.
5. Canada. Translation Bureau. Professional and Technical Training Directorate. 1994. Pleins feux sur la qualité: Rapport sur les tendances en 1993-1994. Hull, Quebec.
6. Council of Translators and Interpreters of Canada. 1994. Comité de révision de Texamen d'agrément en traduction. Rapport final. Hull, Quebec.
7. Fan, Shouyi. 1990. A Statistical Method for Translation Quality Assessment. Target, 2 (1): 43-67.
8. Gouadec, Daniel. N.d. Présentation du Système d'évaluation positive des traductions (SEPT). Translation Bureau. Hull, Quebec.
9. Gouadec, Daniel. 1981. Paramètres d'évaluation des traductions. Meta, 26 (2): 99-115.
10. Gouadec, Daniel. 1989. Comprendre, évaluer, prévenir: Pratique, enseignement et recherche face à Terreur et à la faute en traduction. TTR, 2 (2): 35-54.
11. Gouadec, Daniel. 1989. Le traducteur, la traduction et l'entreprise. Paris: Afnor.
12. House, Juliane. 1977. A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
13. Newmark, Peter. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
14. Nida, Eugene, and Charles Taber. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
15. Reiss, Katharina. 2000. Translation Criticism -The Potential and Limitations. Translated by Errol F. Rhodes. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
16. Williams, Malcolm. 2001. Application of Argumentation Theory to Translation Quality Assessment. Meta, 46 (2): 326-44.
17. Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Dyson, Steve. 1994. "Horses for Courses" or Meeting Customer Needs, Both Implicit and Explicit. In Catriona Picken, ed., Quality-Assurance, Management and Control. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Institute of Translation and Interpreting, April 28-29,1994, Nottingham, U.K. (London: Institute of Translation and Interpreting), 87-94.
19. Gordon, John. 1994. A Quality Standard for Translations. In Catriona Picken, ed., Quality-Assurance, Management and Control. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Institute of Translation and Interpreting, April 28-29,1994, Nottingham, U.K. (London: Institute of Translation and Interpreting), 34-41.
20. Hermans, Theo. 1991. Translation Norms and Correct Translations. In Kitty van Leuven-Zwart and Ton Naaijkens, eds., Translation Studies: The State of the Art. Proceedings of the First James S. Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 155-69.
21. Hermans, Theo. 1999. Translation and Normativity. In Christina Schaffner, ed., Translation and Norms (Toronto: Multilingual Matters), 50-71.
22. International Organization for Standardization. 1996a. ISO Standards Compendium: ISO 9000 Quality Management. 6th edition. Geneva.
23. International Organization for Standardization. 1996b. ISO 9000-1. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards. Geneva.
24. Laboucheix, Vincent, ed. 1990. Traité de la qualité totale. Paris: Bordas.
25. Lewis, David K. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
26. Picken, Catriona, ed. 1994. Quality-Assurance, Management and Control. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Institute of Translation and Interpreting, April 28-29,1994, Nottingham, U.K. London: Institute of Translation and Interpreting.
27. Rose, Marilyn Gaddis. 1981. Translation Types and Conventions. In Marilyn Gaddis Rose, ed., Translation Spectrum: Essays in Theory and Practice (Albany: SUNY), 31-40.
28. Rose, Marilyn Gaddis, ed. 1981. Translation Spectrum: Essays in Theory and Practice. Albany: SUNY, 1981.
29. Samuelsson-Brown, Geoffrey. 1996. Working Procedures, Quality and Quality Assurance. In Rachel Owens, ed. The Translator's Handbook. 3rd ed. (London: Aslib), 103-35.
30. Schaffner, Christina, ed. 1999. Translation and Norms. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
31. United Nations. Headquarters. 1993. Quality Control in the Working Environment of International Organizations. Unpublished paper. New York.
32. United Nations. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. 1993. The Translation Process. Translation/Revision: Quantity versus Quality Standards. Unpublished paper. Geneva.
33. Urmson, J. O.1965. On Grading. Flew, Anthony, ed. Logic and Language. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 379-409.
34. Viaggio, Sergio. 1999. The Limitations of a Strictly Socio-Historical Description of Norms: A Response to Theo Hermans and Gideon Toury. In Christina Schaffner, ed., Translation and Norms (Toronto: Multilingual Matters), 122-28.
35. Wright, Georg Henrik von. 1963. Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
36. Martinez Melis, Nicole. 1997. évaluation et traduction: cadre de recherche sur l'évaluation dans la didactique de la traduction. Thesis. Universität Autonome de Barcelona.
37. Martinez Melis, Nicole, and Amparo Hurtado. 2001. Assessment in Translation Studies: Research Needs. Meta, 46 (2): 272-87.
38. Accardo, Alain, and Philippe Corcuff. 1986. La sociologie de Bourdieu. Textes choisis et commentés. 2nd ed. Bordeaux: Le Mascaret.
39. Aristotle. 2001. The Basic Works of Aristotle. Edited by Richard McKeon. New York: Modem Library.
40. Barthes, Roland. 1966. Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits. Communications, 8:1-27.
41. Barthes, Roland. 1967. Le discours de l'histoire. Social Science Information, 6 (4): 65-75.
42. Benveniste, émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
43. Benveniste, émile. 1969. Sémiologie de la langue. Semiotica, 1-12.
44. Bruce, Donald. 1995. De l'intertextualité à l'interdiscursivité. Toronto: Paratexte.
45. Chatman, Seymour. 1969. New Ways of Analyzing Narrative Structure, With an Example From Joyce's Dubliners. Language and Style, 2 (1): 4-45.
46. De Beaugrande, Robert. 1980. Text, Discourse and Process: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science of Texts. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
47. De Beaugrande, Robert, and Wolfgang Dressier. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
48. Dolezel, Lubomir. 1971. Toward a Structural Theory of Content in Prose Fiction. In Seymour Chatman, ed., Literary Style: A Symposium (London: Oxford University Press), 95-110.
49. Dolezel, Lubomir. 1976. Narrative Worlds. In Ladislav Matejka, ed., Sound, Sign and Meaning: Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan), 542-52.
50. Ducrot, Oswald. 1972. Preface to John Searle, Les Actes de langage. Paris: Hermann.
51. Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: éditions de Minuit.
52. Ducrot, Oswald, and Tzvetan Todorov. 1972. Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Paris: Seuil.
53. Dupriez, Bernard. 1980. Gradus: Les procédés littéraires. Paris: Union générale d'édition.
54. Dupriez, Bernard. 1991. A Dictionary of Literary Devices. Gradus, A-Z. Translated and adapted by Albert Halsall. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
55. Eco, Umberto. 1992. Les limites de l'interprétation. Translated by Myriem Bouzaher. Paris: Grasset.
56. Esprit, 12 (December 1974). Lecture I: L'espace du texte.
57. Esprit, 11 (November 1975).
58. Esprit, 1 (January 1976). Lecture II: Le texte dans l'espace.
59. Foucault, Michel. 1969. Qu'est-ce qu'un auteur? Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, 64: 73-104.
60. Greimas, A. J. 1966. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.
61. Greimas, A. J., and E. Landowski. 1979. Introduction à l'analyse du discours en sciences sociales. Paris: Hachette.
62. Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
63. Halloran, Michael, and Annette Norris Bradford. 1984. Figures of Speech in the Rhetoric of Science and Technology. In Robert J. Connors, Lisa S. Ede, and Andrea A. Lunsford, eds., Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modem Discourse (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press), 179-92.
64. Halsall, Albert W. 1988. L'art de convaincre: Le récit pragmatique, rhétorique, idéologie, propagande. Toronto: Paratexte.
65. Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
66. Itkonen, Esa. 1983. Causality in Linguistic Theory: A Critical Investigation Into the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of "Non-Autonomous" Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
67. Kuhn, Deanna. 1991. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Leith, Dick. 1994. The Rhetor's Guide. Rhetorica, 12 (2): 211-26.
69. Macherey, Pierre. 1966. Pour une théorie de la production littéraire. Paris: François Maspero.
70. Maingueneau, Dominique. 1976. Initiation aux méthodes de l'analyse du discours: problèmes et perspectives. Paris: Hachette.
71. Maingueneau, Dominique. 1984. Genèses du discours. Brussels: Pierre Mardaga.
72. Molinié, Georges. 1992. Dictionnaire de rhétorique. Paris: Librairie générale française.
73. Nanni, Luciano. 1991. Art et critique: la liberté en tant que pertinence. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 45: 249-60.
74. Nanni, Luciano. 1994. I cosmi, il metodo: diario d'arte e di epistemologia 1979/89. Bologna: Book Editore.
75. Nanni, Luciano. 1995. L'arte? L'estetica va bene, ma la scienza che c'entra? In Stefano Zecchi, ed., Estetica. Le arti e la scienze (Bologna: Il Mulino), 153-76.
76. Nanni, Luciano. 1996. Estetica e semiotica: il 'ribaltone' post-strutturalista. Paroi, 12: 26-39.
77. Perelman, Chaïm. 1977. L'empire rhétorique: rhétorique et argumentation. Paris: Vrin.
78. Rastier, François. 1987. Sémantique interprétative. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
79. Rastier, François. 1989. Sens et textualité. Paris: Hachette Supérieur.
80. Reboul, Anne, and Jacques Moeschler. 1998a. La pragmatique aujourd'hui. Une nouvelle science de la communication. Paris: Seuil.
81. Reboul, Anne, and Jacques Moeschler. 1998b. Pragmatique du discours. De l'interprétation de l'énoncé à l'interprétation du discours. Paris: Armand Colin.
82. Récanati, François. 1981. Les énoncés performatifs. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.
83. Ricoeur, Paul. 1975. La métaphore vive. Paris: Seuil.
84. Ricoeur, Paul. 1986. Du texte à l'action: Essais d'herméneutique, IL Paris: Seuil.
85. Russell, D. A., and M. Winterbottom, eds. 1972. Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations. London: Oxford University Press.
86. Rybacki, K. C. 1996. Advocacy and Opposition. An Introduction to Argumentation. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
87. Schräg, Calvin. 1992. The Resources of Rationality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
88. Searle, John. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Souchard, Maryse. 1989. Le phénomène d'argumentation dans un discours de presse. Texte, 8-9: 219-26.
91. Stati, Sorin. 1989. Isotopy, Coreference, and Redundancy. In MariaElisabeth Conti, ed., Text and Discourse Connectedeness. Proceedings of the Conference on Connexity and Coherence. Urbino (Italy), July 1984 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 207-22.
92. Todorov, Christo. 1971. La hiérarchie des liens dans le récit. Semiotica, 3 (2): 121-39.
93. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1969. Grammaire du Décaméron. Paris: Mouton.
94. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1970. Les transformations narratives. Poétique, 3: 322-33.
95. Toulmin, Stephen. 1964. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. van Dijk, Teun. 1997. Text and Context, Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
97. van Dijk, Teun, and Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Toronto: Academic Press.
98. Walton, Douglas. 1990. Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation. Savage, Md.: Rowman and Littleford.
99. Ahulu, Samuel. 1997. The Evaluation of Errors and 21st-century Structure and Usage. English Today, 50:33-39.
100. Brislin, Richard. 1976. Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press.
101. Campbell, Stuart. 1999. A Cognitive Approach to Source Text Difficulty in Translation. Target, 11 (1): 33-63.
102. Cary, E., and R. W. Jumpelt, eds. 1963. Quality in Translation. Proceedings of the 3rd Congress of the International Federation of Translators, Bad Godesberg, 1959. New York: Pergamon Press.
103. Dancette, Jeanne. 1989. La faute de sens en traduction. TTR, 2, (2): 83-102.
104. De Beaugrande, Robert. 1978. Factors in a Theory of Poetic Translating. Assen: Van Gorcum.
105. Donaher, Paul. 1994. Evaluating Quality (1). In Catriona Picken, ed., Quality-Assurance, Management and Control. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Institute of Translation and Interpreting, April 28-29,1994, Nottingham, U.K. (London: Institute of Translation and Interpreting), 76-80.
106. Ekundayo, Simpson. 1975. Methodology in Translation Criticism. Meta, 20 (4): 251-62.
107. Ekundayo, Simpson. 1978. Translation and Value Judgment. Meta, 23, (3): 211-19.
108. Even-Zohar, Itamar. 1986. The Textemic Status of Signs in a Literary Text and Its Translation. Poetics Today, 11 (1): 629-33.
109. Graham, J. D. 1994. Evaluating Quality (2). In Catriona Picken, ed., Quality-Assurance, Management and Control. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Institute of Translation and Interpreting, April 28-29,1994, Nottingham, U.K. (London: Institute of Translation and Interpreting), 81-86.
110. Kingscott, Geoffrey. 1996. Providing Quality and Value. In Rachel Owens, ed., The Translator's Handbook. 3rd ed. (London: Aslib), 137-46.
111. Koller, Werner. 1995. The Concept of Equivalence and the Object of Translation Studies. Target, 7 (2): 191-222.
112. Lewis, Philip E. 1985. The Measure of Translation Effects. In Joseph F. Graham, ed., Difference in Translation (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 31-62.
113. Maier, Carol, ed. 2000. Evaluation and Translation. Special issue of The Translator, 6 (2).
114. Mossop, Brian. 1989. Objective Translational Error and the Cultural Norm of Translation. TTR, 2 (2): 55-72.
115. Neubert, Albrecht. 2000. Competence in Language, in Languages, and in Translation. In Christina Schaffner and Beverly Adab, eds., Developing Translation Competence (Philadelphia: John Benjamins), 3-18.
116. Nord, Christiane. 1992. The Relationship Between Text Function and Meaning. In Marcel Thelen and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, eds., Translation and Meaning (Maastricht: Rijkshogeschool), vol. 2, 91-96.
117. Nord, Christiane. 1996. El error en la traducciôn: Categories y evaluation. In Amparo Hurtado Albir, ed., La ensenanza (Castellô: Universitta Jaumé 1), 91-107.
118. Ratcliffe, Paul. 1994. Quality: Absolutism or Pragmatism? In Catriona Picken, ed Quality-Assurance, Management and Control. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Institute of Translation and Interpreting, April 28-29,1994, Nottingham, U.K. (London: Institute of Translation and Interpreting), 47-55.
119. Reiss, Katharina. 1983. Quality in Translation. Babel, 29:198-208.
120. Sager, Juan. 1989. Quality and Standards-The Evaluation of Translations. In Catriona Picken, ed., The Translator's Handbook. 2nd ed. (London: Aslib), 91-102.
121. Schaffner, Christina. 1998. Translation and Quality. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
122. Schaffner, Christina. 2000. Running Before Walking? Designing a Translation Programme at Undergraduate Level. In Christina Schaffner and Beverly Adab, eds., Developing Translation Competence (Philadelphia: John Benjamins), 143-56.
123. Schaffner, Christina, and Beverly Adab, eds. 2000. Developing Translation Competence. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
124. Simpkin, Richard E. 1983. Translation Specifications. In Catriona Picken, ed., The Translator's Handbook. (London: Aslib), 129-39.
125. TTR, 2 (2). 1989. L'erreur en traduction. Edited by Robert Larose.
126. Université de Montréal. 2001. Evaluation: Parameters, Methods, Pedagogical Aspects / Evaluation: paramètres, méthodes, aspects pédagogiques. Special issue of Meta, 46 (2): 326-44.
127. Baker, Mona. 1992. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. New York: Routledge.
128. Berman, Antoine. 1984. L'épreuve de l'étranger. Paris: Gallimard.
129. Chevalier, Jean-Pierre, and Marie-France Delport. 1995. Problèmes linguistiques de la traduction: l'horlogerie de Saint Jérôme. Paris: L'Harmattan.
130. Choul, Jean-Claude. 1985. Une théorie de la traduction est-elle nécessaire? Texte, 4:137-50.
131. Curtis, Sheryl. 1998. Visible Hands: Inferring Translation Strategy. Ph.D. thesis. Concordia University, Montreal.
132. Even-Zohar, Itamar. 1981. Translation Theory Today: A Call for Transfer Theory. Poetics Today, 2 (4): 1-7.
133. Gutknecht, Christoph, and Lutz J. Rolle. 1996. Translating by Factors. Albany: SUNY Press.'
134. Gutt, Ernst-August. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
135. Graham, Joseph F., ed. 1985. Difference in Translation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
136. Hewson, Lance, and Jacky Martin. 1991. Redefining Translation: The Variational Approach. New York: Routledge.
137. Lörscher, Wolfgang. 1991. Translation Performance, Translation Process, and Translation Strategies. A Psycholinguists Investigation. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
138. Mel'cuk, Igor. 1978. Théorie de langage, théorie de traduction. Meta, 23 (4): 271-302.
139. Neubert, Albrecht, and Gregory Shreve. 1992. Translation as Text. Kent, Ohio: Kent University State Press.
140. Owens, Rachel, ed. 1996. The Translator's Handbook. 3rd ed. London: Aslib.
141. Picken, Catriona, ed. 1989. The Translator's Handbook. 2nd ed. London: Aslib.
142. Riffaterre, Michael. 1985. Transposing Presuppositions on the Semiotics of Literary Translation. Texte, 4: 99-109.
143. Ross, Stephen David. 1981. Translation and Similarity. In Marilyn Gaddis Rose, ed. Translation Spectrum: Essays in Theory and Practice (Albany: SUNY), 8-22.
144. Snell-Homby, Mary. 1995. Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Revised ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
145. Steiner, George. 1992. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
146. Toury, Gideon. 1990. What Are Descriptive Studies into Translation Likely to Yield Apart From Isolated Descriptions? In Kitty van Leuven-Zwart and Ton Naaijkens, eds., Translation Studies: The State of the Art. Proceedings of the First James S. Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi), 179-92.