Incorporation of remote sensing data in an upscaled soil water model

Scaling Methods in Soil Physics

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 309-346

  Seyfried, M S ^a  

^a NORTHWEST WATERSHED RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055814342     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. Heuvelink, G.B.M. and Pebesma, E.J., Spatial aggregation and soil process modeling, Geoderma, 89, 47, 1999.
2. Wagenet, R.J. and Hutson, J.L., Scale dependency of solute transport modeling: GIS applications, J. Environ. Qual., 25, 499, 1996.
3. Hornberger, G.M. and Boyer, E.W., Recent advances in watershed modeling, Rev. Geophys. supplement, 949, 1995.
4. Levin, S.A., The problem of pattern and scale in ecology, Ecology, 73, 1943, 1992.
5. Sivapalan, M. and Kalma, J.D., Scale problems in hydrology: contributions of the Robertson workshop, Hydrol. Process., 9, 243, 1995.
6. Bloschl, G. and Sivapalan, M., Scale issues in hydrology: a review, Hydrol. Process, 9, 251, 1995.
7. Beven, K., Linking parameters across scales: subgrid parameterizations and scale dependent hydrological models, Hydrol. Process, 9, 507, 1995.
8. Woolhiser, D.A., Search for physically based runoff model — a hydrologic El Dorado? J. Hydraul. Eng.-ASCE, 122, 122, 1996.
9. Bathurst, J.C. and O’Connel, P.E., Future of distributed modelling: the Systeme Hydrologique Europ-een, Hydrol. Process., 6, 265,1992.
10. Houser, P., Goodrich, D., and Syed, K., Runoff, precipitation, and soil moisture at Walnut Gulch, in Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology, Observations and Modelling, Grayson, R. and Bloschl, G., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, chap 6.
11. Heuvelink, G.B.M., Uncertainty analysis in environmental modeling under a change of spatial scale, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 50, 255, 1998.
12. Addiscott, T.M., Simulation modeling and soil behaviour, Geoderma, 60, 15, 1993.
13. Smith, R.E. and Hebbert, R.H.B., A Monte Carlo analysis of the hydrologic effects of spatial variability on infiltration, Water Resour. Res., 15, 419, 1979.
14. Philip, J.R., Field heterogeneity: Some basic issues, Water Resour. Res., 16, 443, 1980.
15. Rao, P.S.C. and Wagenet, R.J., Spatial variability of pesticides in field soils: Methods for data analysis and consequences, Weed Sci., 33, 18, 1985.
16. Burrough, P.A., Soil variability: a late 20th century view, Soils Fertilizers, 56, 529, 1993.
17. Low, P.F., Viscosity of interlayer water in montmorillonite, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Pro. 40, 500, 1976.
18. Robock, A., Schlorser, C.A., Vinnikov, K.Y., Speranskaya, N.A., Entin, J.K., and Qiu, S., Evaluation of the AMIP soil moisture simulations, Global Planet. Change, 19, 181, 1998.
19. Kutilek, M. and Nielsen, D.R., Soil Hydrology, Catena Verlag, Cremlingen, Germany, 1994, chap.2.
20. Hugie, V.K. and Passey H.B., Soil surface patterns of some semiarid soils in northern Utah, southern Idaho, and northeastern Nevada, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Pro., 28, 786, 1964.
21. Nettleton, W.D. and Peterson, F.F., Aridisols, in Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy II. The Soil Orders, Wilding, L.P., Smeck, N.E., and Hall, G.F., Eds., Elsevier, New York, 1983, chap 8.
22. Blackburn, W.H., Factors influencing infiltration and sediment production of semiarid rangelands in Nevada, Water Resour. Res., 11, 929, 1975.
23. Johnson, C.W. and Gordon, N.D., Runoff and erosion from rainfall simulator plots on sagebrush rangeland, Trans. ASAE, 31, 421, 1988.
24. Seyfried, M.S., Infiltration patterns from simulated rainfall on a semiarid rangeland soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1726.
25. Seyfried, M.S. and Wilcox, B.P., Scale and the nature of spatial variability: field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling, Water Resour. Res, 31, 173, 1995.
26. Grayson, R. and Bloschl, G., Spatial processes, organization and patterns, in Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology, Observations and Modelling, Grayson, R. and Bloschl, G., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, Chap 1.
27. Bloschl, G., Scaling in hydrology, Hydrol. Process.,15, 709, 2001.
28. Jackson, T.J. and Le Vine, D.E., Mapping surface soil moisture using an aircraft-based passive microwave instrument: algorithm and example, J. Hydrol., 184, 57, 1996.
29. Verhoest, N.E.C., Troch, P.W., Paniconi, C., and De Troch, F.P., Mapping basin scale variable sources areas from mulitemporal remotely sensed observations of soil moisture behavior, Water Resour. Res., 34, 3235, 1998.
30. Kustas, W.P. and Norman, J.M., Use of remote sensing for evapotranspiration monitoring over land surfaces, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 41, 495, 1996.
31. Refsgaard, J.C., Toward a formal approach to calibration and validation of models using spatial data, in Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology, Observations and Modelling, Grayson, R. and Bloschl, G., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, Chap 13.
32. Jackson, T.J., Schmugge, J., and Engman, E.T., Remote sensing applications to hydrology: soil moisture, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 41, 517, 1996.
33. Ulaby, F.T., Dubois, P.C., and vanZyl, J., Radar mapping of surface soil moisture, J. Hydrol., 184, 57, 1996.
34. Goyal, S.K., Seyfried, M.S., and O’Neill, P.E., Correction of surface roughness and topographic effects on airborne SAR in mountainous rangeland areas, Remote Sens. Environ, 67, 124, 1999.
35. Hoosbeek, M.R. and Bryant, R.B., Towards the quantitative modeling of pedogenesis — a review, Geoderma, 55, 184, 1992.
36. Slaughter, C.W., Marks, D., Flerchnger, G.N., Van Vactor, S.S., and Burgess, M., Thirty-five years of research data collection at the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, United States, Water Resour. Res., 37, 2819, 2001.
37. Hanson, C.L., Long-term precipitation database, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, USA, Water Resour. Res, 37, 2831, 2001.
38. Seyfried, M.S., Harris, R.C., Marks, D., and Jacob, B., Geographic database: Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, USA, Water Resour. Res, 37, 2825, 2001.
39. Pierson, F.B., Flerchinger, G.N., and Wight, J. R., Simulating near-surface soil temperature and water on sagebrush rangelands — a comparison of models, T. ASAE, 35, 1449, 1992.
40. Seyfried, M.S., Spatial variability constraints to modeling soil water at different scales. Geoderma, 85, 231, 1998.
41. Flerchinger, G.N., and Cooley, K.R., A ten-year water balance of a mountainous semi-arid watershed, J. Hydrol, 237, 86, 2000.
42. Rawls, W.J., Zuzel, J. F., and Schumaker, G.A., Soil moisture trends on sagebrush rangelands, J. Soil Water Conserv., 28, 270, 1973.
43. Addiscott, T.M. and Wagenet, R.J., Concepts of solute leaching in soils: a review of modelling approaches, J. Soil Sci., 36, 411, 1985.
44. Hillel, D., Applications of Soil Physics, Academic Press, New York, 1980, chap.3.
45. Seyfried, M.S. and Rao, P.S.C., Nutrient leaching loss from two contrasting cropping systems in the humid tropics, Trop. Agr., 68, 9, 1991.
46. Priestly, C.H.B. and Taylor, R.J., On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev, 100, 81, 1972.
47. Nofziger, D.L., Williams, J. R., Hornsby, A.G., and Wood, A.L., Physical characteristics of soils of the Southern region — Bethany, Konawa, and Tipton series, Southern Cooperative Series, Bulletin No. 265, Agricultural experiment station, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 1983.
48. Pachepsky, Y., Rawls, W.J., and Gimenez, D., Comparison of soil water retention at field and laboratory scales, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 460, 2001.
49. Chen, C. and Payne, W.A., Measured and modeled unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of a Walla Walla silt loam, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 1385, 2001.
50. Gomez, J.A., Giraldez, J. V., and Fereres, E., Analysis of infiltration and runoff in an olive orchard under no-till, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 291, 2001.
51. Warrick, A.W. and Nielsen, D.R., Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field, in Applications of Soil Physics, Hillel, D., Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1980, Chap. 13.
52. Wilding, L.P. and Drees, L.R., Spatial variability and pedology, in Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy, I. Concepts and Interactions, Wilding, L.P., Smeck, N.E., and Hall, G.F., Eds., Elsevier, New York, 1983, chap.4.
53. Jury, W.A., Russo, D., Sposito, G., and Elabd, H., The spatial variability of water and solute transport properties in unsaturated soil, I. Analysis of property variation and spatial structure with statistical models, Hilgardia, 55, 1, 1987.
54. Tseng, P.-H. and Jury, W.A., Comparison of transfer and deterministic modeling of area-averaged solute transport in a heterogeneous field, Water Resour. Res., 30, 2051, 1994.
55. Jensen, K.H. and Mantoglou, A., Application of stochastic unsaturated flow theory, numerical simulations, and comparisons to field observations, Water Resour. Res, 28, 269, 1992.
56. Foussereau, X., Graham, W.D., and Rao, P.S.C., Stochastic analysis of transient flow in unsaturated heterogeneous soils, Water Resour. Res, 36, 891, 2000.
57. Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L., and Saxton, K.E., Estimation of soil water properties, T. ASAE 5, 1316, 1982.
58. Ritchie, J.T., Gerakis, A., Suleiman, A., Simple model to estimate field-measured soil water limits, T. ASAE, 42, 1609, 1999.
59. Van Genuchten, M. Th., A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892, 1980.
60. Mishra, S., Parker, J. C., and Singhal, N., Estimation of soil hydraulic properties and their uncertainty from particle size distribution data, J. Hydrol., 108, 1, 1989.
61. Vereecken, H., Estimating the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from theoretical models using simple soil properties, Geoderma, 65, 81, 1995.
62. Kutilek, M. and Nielsen, D.R., Soil Hydrology, Catena Verlag, Cremlingen, Germany, 1994, chap.5.
63. Kastanek, F.J. and Nielsen, D.R., Description of soil water characteristic using cubic spline interpolation, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 279, 2001.
64. Vanclooster, M., Viaene, P., Diels, J., and Feyen, J., A deterministic evaluation analysis applied to an integrated soil-crop model, Ecol. Model., 81, 183, 1995.
65. Franks, S.W., Beven, K.J., Quinn, P.F., and Wright, I.R., On the sensitivity of soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes: equifinality and the problem of robust calibration, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 86, 63, 1997.
66. Beven, K., Limits of splitting: hydrology, Sci.Total Environ., 183, 89, 1996.
67. Beven, K., Changing ideas in hydrology — the case of physically based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157, 1989.
68. Seyfried, M.S., Murdock, M.D., Hanson, C.L., Flerchinger, G.N. and Van Vactor, S., Long-term soil water content database, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watersehd, Idaho, United States, Water Resour. Res, 37, 2847, 2001.
69. Savage, M.J., Ritchie, J. T., Bland, W.L., and Dugas, W.A., Lower limit of soil water availability, Agron. J, 88, 644, 1996.
70. Ratliff, L.F., Ritchie, J. T., and Cassel, D.K., Field-measured limits of soil water availability as related to laboratory-measured properties, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47, 770, 1983.
71. Western, A. and Grayson, R., Soil moisture and runoff processes at Tarrawarra, in Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology, Observations and Modelling, Grayson, R. and Bloschl, G., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, chap 9.
72. Leenhardt, D., Voltz, M., and Rambal, S., A survey of several agroclimatic soil water balance models with reference to their spatial application, Eur. J. Agron., 4, 1, 1995.
73. Wilcox, B.P., Seyfried, M.S., Cooley, K.R., and Hanson, C.L., Runoff characteristics of sagebrush rangelands: modeling implications, J. Soil Water Conserv., 46, 153, 1991.
74. Wight, J. R. and Hanks, R.J., A water-balance, climate model for range herbage production, J. Range Manage, 34, 307, 1981.
75. Cooley, K.R. and Robertson, D.C., Evaluating soil water models on western rangelands, J. Range Manage, 37, 529, 1984.
76. Wight, J. R., Hanson, C.L., and Cooley, K.R., Modeling evapotranspiration from sagebrush-grass rangeland, J. Range Manage, 39, 81, 1986.
77. Weltz, M.A. and Blackburn, W.H., Modeling water balance with the ERHYM model on south Texas rangelands, Water Resour. Bull., 29, 461,1993.
78. Hanks, R.J., Model for predicting plant yield as influenced by water use, Agron. J., 66, 660, 1974.
79. Ritchie, J. T., A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat, in Wheat Growth and Modelling, Day, W. and Atkin, R.K., Eds., NATO-ASI Series — Series A Life Sciences, 86, 293, 1985.
80. Mahdian, M.H. and Gallichand, J., Validation of the SUBSTOR model for simulating soil water content, T. ASAE, 38, 513, 1995.
81. Timlin, D.J., Pachepsky, Y., Snyder, V.A., and Bryant, R.B., Water budget approach to quantify corn grain yields under variable rooting depths, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 1219, 2001.
82. Li, W., Li, B., Shi, Y., Jacques, D., and Feyen, J., Effect of spatial variation of textural layers on regional field water balance, Water Resour. Res., 37, 1209, 2001.
83. Sturges, D.L., Hydrologic relations on undisturbed and converted big sagebrush lands: the status of our knowledge, USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-140, Rocky Mt. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, Colo, 1975.
84. Campbell, G.S. and Harris, G.A., Water relations and water use patterns for artemesia tridentata nutt., in wet and dry years, Ecology, 58, 652, 1977.
85. Kremer, R.G. and Running, S.W., Simulating seasonal soil water balance in contrasting semi-arid vegetation communities, Ecol. Model., 84, 151, 1996.
86. Lillesand, T.M. and Kiefer, R.W., Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994.
87. Clark, P.E., Seyfried, M.S., and Harris, B., Intermountain plant community classification using Landsat TM and SPOT HRV data, J. Range Manage., 54, 152, 2001.
88. Shiflet, T.N., Rangeland cover types of the United States, Society for Range Management, Denver, Colo. 1994.
89. Rose, C.W., Modelling evapotranspiration: an approach to heterogeneous communities, Agr. Water Manage, 8, 203, 1984.
90. Shuttleworth, W.J., A one-dimensional theoretical description of the vegetation-atmosphere interaction, Bound.-Lay Meteorol., 10, 273, 1976.
91. Ritchie, J. T., Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover, Water Resour. Res, 8, 1204, 1972.
92. Clark, P.E. and Seyfried, M.S., Point sampling for leaf area index in sagebrush steppe communities, J. Range Manage.,54, 589, 2001.
93. Weigand, C.L., Richardson, A.J., and Kanemasu, E.T., Leaf-area index estimates for wheat from landsat and their implications for evapotranspiration and crop modeling, Agron. J., 71, 336, 1979.
94. Asrar, G., Fuchs, M., Kanemasu, E.T., and Hatfield, J.L., Estimating absorbed photosynthetic radiation and leaf area index from spectral reflectance in wheat, Agron. J., 76, 300, 1984.
95. Peterson, D.L., Spanner, M.A., Running, S.W., and Teuber, K.B., Relationship of thematic mapper simulator data to leaf area index of temperate coniferous forests, Remote Sens. Environ., 22, 323, 1987.
96. Gregoire, H.C. and Raffy, M., Elaboration of multispectral models for heterogeneous media: application to the LAI, Remote Sensing Rev., 15, 223, 1997.
97. Huete, A.R., A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), Remote Sens. Environ, 25, 295, 1988.
98. Crosby, G.S., Neale, C.M.U., Seyfried, M.S., and Tarboton, D., Remote sensing inputs and a GIS interface for distributed hydrologic modelling, in Remote Sensing and Hydrology 2000, Owe, M., Brubaker, K., Ritchie, J., and Rango, A., Eds., IAHS Publ. 267, 421, 2001.
99. Crosby, G.S., Use of remote sensing for input parameter development to geographical information-based hydrologic models at different scales, MS thesis, Utah State University, Logan, 2002.
100. Neale, C.M.U. and Crowther, B.G., An airborne multispectral video/radiometer remote sensing system: development and calibration, Remote Sens. Environ, 49, 187, 1994.
101. Neale, C.M.U., Classification and mapping of riparian systems using airborne multispectral videog-raphy, Restor. Ecol., 5 (4S), 103, 1997.
102. Kremer, R.G. and Running, S.W., Community type differentiation using NOA/AVHRR data within a sagebrush-steppe ecosystem, Remote Sens. Environ, 46, 311, 1993.
103. De Jong, R., Comparison of two soil-water models under semi-arid growing conditions, Can. J. Soil Sci., 68, 17, 1988.
104. Seyfried, M.S., Flerchinger, G.N., Murdock, M.D., Hanson, C.L., and Van Vactor, S., Long-term soil temperature database, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, United States, Water Resour. Res., 37, 2843, 2001.
105. Le Houerou, H.N., Bingham, R.L., and Skerbek, W., Relationships between the variability of primary production and the variability of annual precipitation in work arid lands, J. Arid Environ, 15, 1, 1988.
106. de Wit, C.T., Transpiration and crop yields, institute of biological and chemical research on field crops and herbage, Wageningen, the Neterherlands, Verse-Landbuwk, onder Z, No. 64.4-S Grafenhage, 1958.
107. Hatfield, J.L., Sauer, T.J., and Prueger, J.H., Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency: a review, Agron. J., 93, 271, 2001.
108. Pandit, K., A study of soil moisture variability and vegetation greeness dynamics in a mountainous rangeland watershed using direct measurements, remote sensing and modeling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, 1999.
109. Dooge, J.C.I., Looking for hydrologic laws, Water Resour. Res., 22, 46s, 1986.
110. Kutilek, M. and Nielsen, D.R., Soil Hydrology, Catena Verlag, Cremlingen, Germany, 1994, 333.