Governmental Corruption and Social Change in New Zealand: Using Scenarios, 1950–2020

Asian Journal of Political Science

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 117-139

  Gregory, Robert ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Governmental Corruption; New Zealand; Scenarios; Social Change

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055388551     PISSN: 02185377     EISSN: 17507812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02185370601063167     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Banfield, E., 1975. ‘Corruption as a Feature of Governmental Organization’. Journal of Law and Economics, 18: 587–605.
2. Behn, R., 2004. “ ‘Performance, People, Pay’ ”. In Bob Behn's Public Management Report, Cambridge: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
3. Bjørnskov, C., (2003). ‘Corruption and Social Capital’, Working Paper 03-13. Department of Economics, Aarhus School of Business.
4. Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., and Walsh, P., 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model, Auckland: Oxford University Press.
5. Coleman, J., 1990. Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Controller and Auditor-General (2001). Parliamentary Salaries, Allowances and Other Entitlements. Wellington: Office of the Controller and Auditor-General.
7. Controller and Auditor-General (2003a). Report into Expenses Incurred by Dr Ross Armstrong as Chairperson of Three Public Entities. Wellington: Office of the Controller and Auditor-General.
8. Controller and Auditor-General (2003b). Inquiry into Public Funding of Organisations Associated with Donna Awatere-Huata MP. Wellington: Office of the Controller and Auditor-General.
9. Easton, B., 1997. In Stormy Seas: The Post-War New Zealand Economy, Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
10. Girling, J., 1997. Corruption, Capitalism and Democracy, London: Routledge.
11. Gregory, R., 1995. “ ‘Accountability, Responsibility and Corruption: Managing the “Public Production Process”’ ”. In The State Under Contract, Edited by: Boston, J., 56–77. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
12. Gregory, R., 1999. ‘Social Capital Theory and Administrative Reform: Maintaining Ethical Probity in Public Service’. Public Administration Review, 59 (1): 63–75.
13. Gregory, R., 2001. “ ‘Transforming Governmental Culture: A Sceptical View of New Public Management in New Zealand’ ”. In New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, Edited by: Christensen, T., and Laegreid, P., 231–258. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
14. Gregory, R., 2002. ‘Governmental Corruption in New Zealand: A View Through Nelson's Telescope?’. Asian Journal of Political Science, 10 (1): 17–38.
15. Gregory, R., (2003). ‘New Zealand—The End of Egalitarianism?’, in C., Hood, B. G., Peters with G., Lee (eds), Reward for High Public Office: Asian and Pacific Rim States. London: Routledge, pp. 88–104.
16. Gregory, R., and Hicks, C., 1999. ‘Promoting Public Service Integrity: A Case for Responsible Accountability’. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58 (4): 3–15.
17. Henderson, A., 1990. The Quest for Efficiency: The Origins of the State Services Commission, Wellington: State Services Commission.
18. Hood, C., 1991. ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’. Public Administration, 69 (1): 3–19.
19. Ingraham, P., 1998. “ ‘Making Public Policy: The Changing Role of the Higher Civil Service’ ”. In Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms, Edited by: Peters, B. G., and Savoie, D., 164–186. Montreal and Kingston: Canadian Centre for Management Development.
20. James, C., 2002. The Tie That Binds: The Relationship Between Ministers and Chief Executives, Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington Institute of Policy Studies/New Zealand Centre for Public Law.
21. Le Grand, J., 1997. ‘Knights, Knaves or Pawns? Human Behaviour and Social Policy’. Journal of Social Policy, 26 (2): 149–169.
22. Lindblom, C., 1990. Inquiry and Change: The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society, New Haven: Yale University Press.
23. Lipson, L., 1948. The Politics of Equality: New Zealand's Adventures in Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Maor, M., 2004. ‘Feeling the Heat? Anticorruption Mechanisms in Comparative Perspective’. Governance, 17 (1): 1–28.
25. Massey University (1997). ‘The Role of Government and Work Orientation’, International Social Survey Programme, Department of Marketing.
26. Massey University (2000). ‘Social Equality in New Zealand’, International Social Survey Programme, Department of Marketing.
27. Newbold, G., 2000. Crime in New Zealand, Palmerston North: The Dunmore Press.
28. Norman, R., 2003. Obedient Servants? Management Freedoms and Accountabilities in the New Zealand Public Sector, Wellington: Victoria University Press.
29. O'Dea, D., 2000. “ ‘The Changes in New Zealand's Income Distribution’ ”. In Treasury Working Paper 00/13, Wellington: The Treasury.
30. Perry, P., and Webster, A., 1999. New Zealand Politics at the Turn of the Millennium: Attitudes and Values about Politics and Government, Auckland: Alpha Publications.
31. Polaschek, R., 1958. Government Administration in New Zealand, London: Oxford University Press.
32. Public Service Association (2003). The New Zealand Experiment. Wellington: Public Service Association.
33. Putnam, R., 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.
34. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R., 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35. Rose-Ackerman, S., 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Rothstein, B., and Stolle, D., (2001). Social Capital and Street-Level Bureaucracy: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust, paper presented at the 1st General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (Canterbury, UK, September).
37. Schick, A., (1996). The Spirit of Reform: Managing the New Zealand State Sector in a Time of Change (A Report Prepared for the State Services Commission and the Treasury, New Zealand). Wellington: State Services Commission.
38. Scott, G., 2001. Public Management in New Zealand: Lessons and Challenges, Wellington: New Zealand Business Roundtable.
39. Serious Fraud Office (2005). Annual Report of the Serious Fraud Office as at 30 June 2005. Auckland: Serious Fraud Office.
40. State Sector Standards Board (2001). A Report to the Minister of State Services on The Ethos of the State Sector. Wellington: Office of the Minister of State Services.
41. State Services Commission (2000). Annual report of the State Services Commission for the Year Ended 30 June 2000. Wellington: State Services Commission.
42. Transparency International (2003). National Integrity Systems: Transparency International Country Study Report–New Zealand. Berlin: Transparency International.
43. Triggs, S., 1997. Interpreting Trends in Recorded Crime in New Zealand, Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
44. Vickers, G., 1965. The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making, London: Chapman and Hall.
45. Vickers, G., 1983. Human Systems Are Different, London: Harper and Row.
46. Vickers, G., 1987. “ ‘Norms and Meanings’ ”. In Policymaking, Communication, and Social Learning: Essays of Sir Geoffrey Vickers, Edited by: Adams, G., Forester, J., and Catron, B., 39–49. Oxford: Transaction Books.
47. von Maravic, P., and Reichard, C., 2003. ‘New Public Management and Corruption: IPMN Dialogue and Analysis’. International Public Management Review, 4 (1): 84–129.
48. Warren, M., (2001). Social Capital and Corruption, paper presented to the European Science Foundation Conference, Social Capital: Interdisciplinary Perspectives’ (University of Exeter UK, September).
49. Wilson, J., 1983. Thinking About Crime, New York: Basic Books.
50. Wilson, J., and Herrnstein, R., 1985. Crime and Human Nature, New York: Simon and Schuster.