United States Hegemony and globalisation: What role for theories of imperialism?

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 205-221

  Kiely, Ray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055357335     PISSN: 09557571     EISSN: 1474449X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09557570600723647     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Albo, G. 2003. “ The Old and New Economics of Imperialism ”. In The Socialist Register 2004, Edited by: Panitch, Leo, and Leys, Colin. 88–113. London: Merlin.
2. Ali, T. 2004. Bush in Babylon, London: Verso.
3. Bairoch, P. 1993. Economics and World History, London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
4. Bairoch, P, and Kozul-Wright, R. 1996. Globalization Myths: Some Historical Reflections on Integration, Industrialization and Growth in the World Economy, Geneva: UNCTAD Discussion Paper 113.
5. Barratt-Brown, M. 1970. After Imperialism, London: Merlin.
6. Boot, M (2003) ‘The Case for American Empire’, Weekly Standard, October 15
7. Brenner, R. 2003. Towards the Precipice. London Review of Books, 25 (3): 15–22. < www.lrb.co.uk>
8. Bromley, S. 2005. Oil and United States Hegemony. Government and Opposition, 40 (2): 238–255.
9. Bukharin, N. 1973. Imperialism and World Economy, London: Merlin.
10. Burbach, R, and Robinson, B. 1999. The Fin De Siecle Debate: Globalisation as Epochal Shift. Science and Society, 63 (1): 5–30.
11. Callinicos, A. 2002. “ Marxism and Global Governance ”. In Governing Globalization, Edited by: Held, David, and McGrew, Anthony. 249–266. Cambridge: Polity.
12. Callinicos, A. 2003. The New Mandarins of American Power, Cambridge: Polity.
13. Callinicos, A. 2005. Imperialism and global political economy. International Socialism, 108: 109–128.
14. Chang, HJ. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder, London: Anthem.
15. Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium, 10 (2): 126–155.
16. Desai, M. 2002. Marx's Revenge, London: Verso.
17. Doyle, M. 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs: Part One. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12 (3): 205–235.
18. Gallagher, K, ed. 2005. Putting Development First, London: Zed.
19. Gallagher, J, and Robinson, R. 1953. The Imperialism of Free Trade. Economic History Review, 6 (1): 1–18.
20. Gill, S. 2003. Power and Resistance in the New World Order, Palgrave: Macmillan.
21. Gowan, P. 2001. Neoliberal Cosmopolitanism. New Left Review, II (11): 70–85.
22. Gowan, P. 2002. “ The American Campaign for Global Sovereignty ”. In The Socialist Register 2003, 1–28. London: Merlin.
23. Green, P. 2002. “The Passage from Imperialism to Empire”: A Commentary on Empire by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. Historical Materialism, 10 (1): 29–77.
24. Hardt, M, and Negri, T. 2000. Empire, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
25. Hardt, M, and Negri, T. 2004. Multitude, New York: Penguin.
26. Harris, J. 2003. Transnational Competition and the End of US Economic Hegemony. Science and Society, 67 (1): 68–80.
27. Harvey, D. 2003. The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Hilferding, R. 1981. Finance Capital, London: Routledge.
29. Kautsky, K. 2002. Ultra-Imperialism. Workers Liberty, 2 (3): 73–79.
30. Kiely, R. 2005a. Empire in the Age of Globalization, London: Pluto.
31. Kiely, R. 2005b. The Clash of Globalisations, Leiden: Brill.
32. Klare, M. 2004. Blood and Oil, London: Hamish Hamilton.
33. Lacher, H. 2005. International Transformation and the Persistence of Territoriality: Toward a New Political Geography of Capitalism. Review of International Political Economy, 12 (1): 26–52.
34. Lenin, V. 1975. Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism, Moscow: Progress.
35. Lindert, P, and Williamson, J. 2001. Cambridge, Massachusetts: NBER. ‘Does Globalization Make the World More Unequal?’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8228
36. Monthly Review. 2003. Editorial: What Recovery?. Monthly Review, 54 (11): 1–11.
37. Morgan, P. 2003. “ Iraq ”. In Anti-Imperialism: A Guide for the Movement, Edited by: Reza, Farah. 107–116. London: Bookmarks.
38. National Security Strategy (2002) ‘The National Security Strategy of the United States of America’, < www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html (http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html) >, accessed 28 February 2006
39. Olle, W, and Schoeller, W. 1982. Direct Investment and Monopoly Theories of Imperialism. Capital and Class, 16: 41–60.
40. Panitch, L. 1994. “ Globalisation and the State ”. In The Socialist Register 1994, Edited by: Miliband, Ralph, and Panitch, Leo. 60–93. London: Merlin.
41. Panitch, L. 2000. The New Imperial State. New Left Review, II (1): 5–20.
42. Panitch, L, and Gindin, S. 2003. “ Global Capitalism and American Empire ”. In The Socialist Register 2004, Edited by: Panitch, Leo, and Leys, Colin. 1–42. London: Merlin.
43. Panitch, L, and Gindin, S. 2004. “ Finance and American Empire ”. In The Socialist Register 2005, Edited by: Panitch, Leo, and Leys, Colin. 46–81. London: Merlin.
44. Panitch, L, and Gindin, S. 2006. “Imperialism and Global Political Economy”—A Reply to Alex Callinicos. International Socialism, 109: 194–199.
45. Pijl, K. 1998. Transnational Classes and International Relations, London: Routledge.
46. Rees, J. 2000. Oil, Gas and NATO's New Frontier. New Political Economy, 5 (1): 100–104.
47. Robinson, W. 2002. “ Capitalist Globalization and the Transnationalization of the State ”. In Historical Materialism and Globalization, Edited by: Rupert, Mark, and Smith, Hazel. 210–229. London: Routledge.
48. Robinson, W. 2004. A Theory of Global Capitalism, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49. Saad-Filho, A. 2005. “ The Political Economy of Neoliberalism in Latin America ”. In Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader, Edited by: Saad-Filho, Alfredo, and Johnston, Deborah. 222–229. London: Pluto.
50. Sachs, J, and Warner, A. 1995. Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration, Washington DC: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1.
51. Sklair, L. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class, Oxford: Blackwell.
52. Smith, N. 2005. The Endgame of Globalization, New York: Routledge.
53. Starr, H. 1997. Democracy and Integration: Why Democracies Don't Fight Each Other. Journal of Peace Research, 32 (2): 153–162.
54. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 1998. World Investment Report 1998, Geneva: UNCTAD.
55. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2004. World Investment Report 2004, Geneva: UNCTAD.
56. Warren, B. 1980. Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism, London: Verso.
57. Went, R. 2002. Globalization in the Perspective of Imperialism. Science and Society, 66 (4): 473–497.