Networks and meta-regulation: Strategies aimed at governing illicit synthetic drugs

Policing and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 370-385

  Cherney, Adrian ^a   O'Reilly, Juani ^b   Grabosky, Peter ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b Australian Federal Police   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Illicit synthetic drugs; Leveraging; Meta regulation; Networks; Policing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055357251     PISSN: 10439463     EISSN: 14772728     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10439460600973693     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Australian Crime Commission (ACC). 2003. Australian Illicit Drug Report, 2001–2002, Canberra: ACC.
2. Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J., 1992. Responsive Regulation, New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Braithwaite, J., 2000. “The new regulatory state and the transformation of criminology”. British Journal of Criminology, 40 (2): 222–238.
4. Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P., 2000. Global Business Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (2004), International Narcotics Control Strategy Report: 2003, US Department of State, Issued March 2004. Available online at: http://www.state.gov/g/inl/rls/nrcrpt/ (accessed 13 December 2004).
6. Canty, C., Sutton, A., and James, S., 2001. “Models of community-based drug law enforcement”. Police Practice and Research, 2 (3): 171–187.
7. Castellano, T., 2003. An Evaluation of the COPS Office Methamphetamine Initiative, Washington, DC: Office of Community Orientated Policing Services, US Department of Justice.
8. Chawla, S., 1998. “They're clandestine. They can heal. They can kill”. United Nations Chronicle, 35 (2): 34–35.
9. Cherney, A., (2005), The Problem of Clandestine Drug Labs: International Experience and Tackling Illicit Synthetic Drug Manufacture Through Co-Production. Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology 18th Annual Conference, Crime Community and the State, 9–11 February, Wellington.
10. Cherney, A., O'Reilly, J., & Grabosky, P., (2004a), International Experience in Chemical Diversion and Control: The Case of Illicit Synthetic Drugs. Paper presented at the 8th National Chemical Diversion Congress, Achieving Supply Reduction through Partnerships and Education, 19–21, October, Melbourne.
11. Cherney, A., O'Reilly, J., & Grabosky, P., (2004b), The Governance of Illicit Synthetic Drugs. Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology Conference, Crime in Australia: International Connections, 29–30 November, Melbourne.
12. Cherney, A., O'Reilly, J., & Grabosky, P., (2005), The Governance of Illicit Synthetic Drugs. Project report funded by National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund and the Australian Federal Police, National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, South Australia.
13. Cherney, A., O'Reilly, J., and Grabosky, P., 2006. “The multilateralization of policing: The case of illicit synthetic drug control”. Police Practice and Research, 7 (3): 177–194.
14. Clanton Advertiser (2004), “US AL: New state law aimed to curb meth cookers”, Clanton Advertiser, 5 September. Available online at: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04.n1272.a04.html (accessed 13 December 2004).
15. Crawford, A., 2004. “Contractual governance of deviant behaviour”. Journal of Law and Society, 30 (4): 479–505.
16. Dallas Morning News (2004), “Methbusters: Simple laws restrict supply for labs”, 22 August. Available online at: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04.n1200.a06.html (accessed 13 December 2004).
17. Dirección Nacional de Estupefacientes (DNE) (2003), Columbia's War Against Drugs: Actions and Results 2002, DNE, Bogota. Available online at: http://www.dnecolombia.gov.co/doc/Publicaciones/estrategica/Libro_Blanco02ingles.pdf
18. Dorn, N., Bucke, T., and Goulden, C., 2003. “Traffic, transit and transaction: A conceptual framework for action against drug supply”. Howard Journal, 42 (4): 348–365.
19. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (2000) Chemicals Used in the Clandestine Production of Drugs, Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Drug and Evaluation Section, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC (unpublished document).
20. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (2003a), The Methamphetamine Situation in the United States, DEA Intelligence Divisions, Washington, DC.
21. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (2003b), Drugs of Abuse, DEA, US Department of Justice, Arlington, VA.
22. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (2003c), Microgram Bulletin, Vol. 36, no. 4. Available online at: http://www.dea.gov/programs/forensicsci/microgram/index.html
23. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (2003d), Facing the Methamphetamine Problem in America. Statement of Rogelio E. Guevara, Chief of Operations, DEA, before the House Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, 18 July.
24. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (2004b), Chemical Handlers Manual: A Guide to Chemical Control Regulations, Drug Enforcement Administration, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
25. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (n.d.A), Chemical Diversion and Synthetic Drug Manufacture. DEA Intelligence Report. Available online at: http//www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/intel010621p.html
26. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (n.d.B), Clandestine Laboratory Awareness. Pamphlet produced by the DEA, Clandestine Laboratory Enforcement Team, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
27. Dupont, B., 2004. “Security in the age of networks”. Policing & Society, 14 (1): 76–91.
28. Dupont, B., Grabosky, P., and Shearing, C., 2003. “The governance of security in weak and failing states”. Criminal Justice: International Journal of Policy and Practice, 3 (4): 331–349.
29. Edwards, A., and Gill, P., 2002. “Crime as enterprise? The case of transnational organised crime”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 37 (3): 203–223.
30. Garland, D., 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Gordon, S., 2001. “Technology impacts on drug production in Asia: The role of amphetamines in Asia's growing drug problem”. Platypus Magazineno, 72: 17–22.
32. Grabosky, P.N., 1995a. “Using non-governmental resources to foster regulatory compliance”. Governance, 4 (8): 527–550.
33. Grabosky, P.N., (1995b), “Regulation by reward: On the use of incentives as regulatory instruments”, Law and Policy, Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 256–281.
34. Grabosky, P.N., (1996), “The future of crime control”, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 63.
35. Hesseling, R., 1994. “Displacement: A review of the empirical literature”. Crime Prevention Studies, 3: 197–230.
36. Hutter, B., 1997. Compliance: Regulation and Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Hutter, B., 2001. Regulation and Risk, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Hutter, B., and Power, M., 2000. Risk Management and Business Regulation, London: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science.
39. Johnston, L., 2000. Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance, Harlow: Longman.
40. International Narcotics Control Board (2004), Precursors and Chemicals Frequently Used in the Illicit Manufacture of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2003 on the Implementation of Article 12 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988, United Nations, New York.
41. Kleiman, M.A.R., and Young, R.M., 1995. “The factors of production in retail drug dealing”. Urban Affairs Review, 30 (5): 730–748.
42. Lint, W.D., 2003. “Keeping open windows: Police as access brokers”. British Journal of Criminology, 43: 379–397.
43. Mazerolle, L.G., Roehl, J., and Kadleck, C., 1998. “Controlling social disorder using civil remedies: Results from a randomized field experiment in Oakland, California”. Crime Prevention Studies, 9: 141–159.
44. Mazerolle, L., and Ransley, J., 2005. Third Party Policing, New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. McEwen, T., et al. (2002), Combating Methamphetamine Laboratories and Abuse, Office of Community Orientated Policing Services, Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/mime/open.pdf?Item=776
46. National Drug Intelligence Center (2003), Chemicals Commonly Used in Methamphetamine Production, National Drug Intelligence Center, Washington, DC.
47. New Zealand Customs Service (2002), Review of Customs Drug Enforcement Strategies 2002: Project Horizon Outcome Report, New Zealand Customs Service, Wellington. Available online at: www.customs.govt.nz
48. Office on Drugs and Crime. 2003. Ecstasy and Amphetamines: Global Survey, 2003, New York: United Nations Office on Drug and Crime.
49. Office on Drugs and Crime. 2004. World Drugs Report, New York: United Nations Office on Drug and Crime.
50. O'Malley, P., 1992. “Risk, power and crime prevention”. Economy and Society, 21 (3): 252–275.
51. Osborne, S., and Gaebler, T., 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
52. Peoria Journal Star (2004), “US IL: Parties collaborating to combat meth use”, Peoria Journal Star, 23 August. Available online at: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04.n1204.a10.html (accessed 13 December 2004).
53. Parker, C., 2002. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Parker, C., and Braithwaite, J., 2003. “Regulation”. In The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies, Edited by: Cane, P., and Tushnet, M., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Rose, N., and Miller, P., 1992. “Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government”. British Journal of Sociology, 43 (2): 173–205.
56. Scott, M.S., (2002), Clandestine Drug Labs, Problem Oriented Guides for Police Series 16, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/e12011406.pdf
57. Schneider, S., Beare, M., and Hill, J., 2000. Alternative Approaches to Combating Transnational Crime, Toronto: KPMG.
58. Shearing, C., 1993. “A constitutive conception of regulation”. In Business Regulation and Australia's Future, Edited by: Grabosky, P., and Braithwaite, J., Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
59. Steel, P., (2003), Study of Clandestine Drug Laboratories. Report produced for the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia, the Donald Mackay Churchill Fellowship study tour to the United States (unpublished).
60. United Nations Drug Control Program (UNCDP). 1996. Amphetamine-type Stimulants: A Global Review, Vienna: UNCDP.
61. Van de Bunt, H.G., and Van der Schoot, C.R.A., 2003. Prevention of Organised Crime: A Situational Approach, Amsterdam: Boom Juridiche uitgevers, Justitie.
62. Victorian Drugs and Crime Prevention Committee (2004), Inquiry into Amphetamine and Party Drug Use in Victoria, Final Report, Victorian Drugs and Crime Prevention Committee, Victoria, Australia. Available online at: http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/dcpc/.
63. Wilkins, C., 2002. “Designer amphetamines in New Zealand: Policy challenges and initiatives”. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 19: 14–28.