Twelve years into the performance measurement revolution: Where we need to go in implementation research

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 27, Issue 8-9, 2004, Pages 701-718

  Frank, Howard A ^a   D'Souza, Jayesh ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055304873     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/PAD-120030262     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Murphy, P., and Carnevale, J., 2002. The Challenge of Developing Cross-Agency Measures: A Case Study of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, Managing for Results Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
2. Kelly, J.A., 2002. Why we should take performance measurement on faith (facts being hard to come by and not terribly important). Public Performance and Management Review, 25 (4): 375–380.
3. Dluhy, M.J., Frank, H.A., Guerra, C., Newell, A.L., and Topinka, J.P., 2000. Handbook on Performance Measurement for Cities in Florida Miami, FL: Florida International University.
4. Halachmi, A., 2002. Performance measurement, accountability and improved performance. Public Performance and Management Review, 25 (4): 370–374. [CROSSREF]
5. Rivenbark, W.C., 2001. Teaching performance management in public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7 (4): 261–266.
6. Frank, H.A., 2002. Teaching performance measurement in a core MPA budgeting class. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8 (2): 141–150.
7. Gianakis, G.A., and Wang, X., 1999. Public officials attitudes toward subjective performance measures. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22 (4): 537–553.
8. Hatry, H.P., Fountain, J.R., Sullivan, J.M., and Kremer, L., 1990. Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting: Its Time has Come Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
9. Gaebler, T., and Osborne, D.E., 1993. Reinventing Government: How The Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming The Public Sector New York, NY: Penguin.
10. Ogata, K., and Goodkey, R., 2002. Redefining Government Performance, Business Performance Measurement 259–275. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. O’Toole, D.E., and Stipak, B., 2002. Productivity trends in local government budgeting. Public Performance and Management Review, 26 (2): 190–203. [CROSSREF]
12. Berman, E.M., and Wang, X., 1990. Performance measurement in U.S. counties: capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60 (5): 409–420. [CROSSREF]
13. Melkers, J.E., and Willoughby, K.G., 1998. The state of the states: performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58 (1) January/February: 66–73.
14. Grizzle, G.A., 1999. Implementing Florida's government performance and accountability act: introduction and overview. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 11 (4): 554–558.
15. Hatry, H.P., 2002. Performance measurement: fashion and fallacies. Public Performance and Management Review, 25 (4): 352–358. [CROSSREF]
16. O’Toole, D.E., and Stipak, B., 2002. Productivity trends in local government budgeting. Public Performance and Management Review, 26 (2): 190–203. [CROSSREF]
17. Pilegge, J.C., 1989. From accounting to ZBB: trends in budgetary research. Public Budgeting and Financial Management, 1 (2): 239–246.
18. Ammons, D.N., 1999. A proper mentality for benchmarking. Public Administration Review, 59 (2): 105–109.
19. Ammons, D.N., 2002. Performance measurement and managerial thinking. Public Performance and Management Review, 25 (4): 344–347. [CROSSREF]
20. Behn, R.D., 2002. Barriers to performance management. Public Performance & Management Review, 26 (1): 5–25.
21. Andrews, M., 2002. A theory-based approach to evaluating budget reforms. International Public Management Journal, 5 (2): 135–154.
22. Ritzer, G.A., 1975. Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23. McKenna, C.K., 1980. Quantitative Methods for Public Decision Making New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Bowsher, C.A., 1985. Governmental financial management at the crossroads. Public Budgeting & Finance, 5 (2): 9–22. [CROSSREF]
25. Harris, J., 1995. Services efforts and accomplishments reporting: fundamental questions of an emerging concept. Public Budgeting & Finance, 15 (4): 18–37. [CROSSREF]
26. Burrell, G., and Morgan, G., 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life London: Heinemann.
27. Rutman, L., 1980. Planning Useful Evaluations: Evaluability Assessment Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Osborne, D., and Plastrik, P., 2000. The Reinventor's Fieldbook: Tools for Transforming Your Government San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
29. Armstrong, J.S., 1985. Long-Range Forecasting from Crystal Ball to Computer New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Swanson, R.A., 1994. Analysis for Improving Performance: Tools for Diagnosing Organizations & Documenting Workplace Expertise San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
31. Mikesell, J.L., 1999. Fiscal Administration: Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector, 5th Ed. Ft. Worth, Texas: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
32. Glaser, M.A., and Denhardt, R.B., 2000. Local government performance through the eyes of citizens. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 12 (1): 49–73.
33. Shelton, M.W., and Albee, T., 2000. Financial performance monitoring and customer-oriented government: a case study. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12 (1): 87–105. [INFOTRIEVE]
34. Lewis, C.W., 1992. Public budgeting: unethical in purpose, product, and promise. Public Budgeting and Financial Management, 4 (3): 667–680.
35. Morley, E., Bryant, S.P., and Hatry, H.P., 2001. Comparative Performance Measurement Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
36. Raimondo, H.J., 1992. Economics of State and Local Government New York, NY: Praeger.
37. Coe, C., 1999. Local government benchmarking: lessons from two major multigovernmental efforts. Public Administration Review, 59 (2): 110–123.
38. Julnes, P., and Holzer, M., 2001. Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61 (6): 693–708. [CSA][CROSSREF]
39. Ukeles, J., 1982. Doing More with Less: Turning Public Management Around New York, NY: ANACOM.
40. Lewis, G.B., and Frank, S.A., 2002. Who wants to work for government?. Public Administration Review, 62 (4): 395–404. [CSA][CROSSREF]
41. Whicker, M.L., Strickland, R.A., and Olfshski, D., 1993. The troublesome cleft: public administration and political science. Public Administration Review, 53 (6): 531–541. [CSA]
42. Campbell, A., Miller, W.E., Converse, P.E., and Stokes, D.E., 1980. The American Voter Unabridged Version. (Midway Reprint) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
43. Coplin, W.D., Merget, A.E., and Bourdeaux, C., 2002. The professional researcher as change agent in the government-performance movement. Public Administration Review, 62 (6): 699–711. [CSA][CROSSREF]
44. Rivenbark, W.C., Personal Communications, 2000, October 26
45. Rivenbark, W.C., and Kelly, J.M., 2000. Performance measurement: a local government response. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 12 (1): 74–86. [CSA]
46. Judd, C.M., Smith, E.R., and Kidder, L.H., 1991. Research Methods in Social Relations, 6th Ed. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
47. Stallings, R.A., 1986. Doctoral programs in public administration: an outsider's perspective. Public Administration Review, 46 (3): 235–240.
48. Forrester, J.P., 1997. The rich diversity of public administration journals: departments and institutional settings—part 2. Public Administra-tion Quarterly, 21 (2): 209–226.
49. Wang, X., 1997. Local officials’ Preferences of Performance Measurements: A Study of Local Police Services (dissertation) Florida International University.
50. Gianakis, G.A., and Frank, H.A., 1998. “ Assessing public administration practice: the case of revenue forecasting ”. In Research in Public Administration Edited by: White, J.D., Vol. 4, 51–64. Stamford, CT: JAI, Press.
51. Jones, A., 1997. Winston-Salem's participation in the North Carolina performance measurement project. Government Finance Review, 13 (3): 35–42.
52. McKenna, C.K., 1980. Quantitative Methods for Public Decision Making New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Yeager, S.J., 1977–1991. Index of the public administration quarterly, Volumes 1 (June, 1977) through 14 (Winter, 1991): introduction. Public Administration Quarterly, 16 (1): 3–5.