Evaluation of the dissemination of SNaX, a middle school-based obesity prevention intervention, within a large US school district

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 724-732

  Bogart, Laura M ^a   Fu, Chong Min ^b   Eyraud, Jodi ^c   Cowgill, Burton O ^d   Hawes Dawson, Jennifer ^a   Uyeda, Kimberly ^c   Klein, David J ^a,b   Elliott, Marc N ^a   Schuster, Mark A ^b,e,f  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Los Angeles Unified School District   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f Kaiser Permanente Southern California   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Dissemination; Obesity prevention; Schools

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAFETERIA DIET; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; DIETARY INTAKE; EARLY INTERVENTION; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXERCISE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MIDDLE SCHOOL; OBESITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL; STUDENT ATTITUDE; STUDENT FOR NUTRITION AND EXERCISE; VEGETABLE; WEB BROWSER; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHILDHOOD OBESITY; HISPANIC; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROCEDURES; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PEDIATRIC OBESITY; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SCHOOLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85054148807     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx055     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Wang Y, Wu Y, Wilson RF, et al. Childhood obesity prevention programs: Comparative effectiveness review and meta-analysis. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013.
2. Sobol-Goldberg S, Rabinowitz J, Gross R. School-based obesity prevention programs: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(12):2422-2428.
3. Wiecha JL, El Ayadi AM, Fuemmeler BF, et al. Diffusion of an integrated health education program in an urban school system: Planet Health. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(6):467-474.
4. Larsen AL, Robertson T, Dunton G. RE-AIM analysis of a randomized school-based nutrition intervention among fourth-grade classrooms in California. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5(3):315-326.
5. Dunton GF, Liao Y, Grana R, et al. State-wide dissemination of a schoolbased nutrition education programme: A RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(2):422-430.
6. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4):327-350.
7. Proctor EK, Brownson RC. Measurement issues in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012, pp. 261-280.
8. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane effective practice and organization of care review group. BMJ. 1998;317(7156):465-468.
9. Ladapo JA, Bogart LM, Klein DJ, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of Students for Nutrition and eXercise (SNaX). Acad Pediatr. 2016;16(3):247-253.
10. Bogart LM, Elliott MN, Cowgill BO, et al. Two-year BMI outcomes from a school-based intervention for nutrition and exercise: A randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5).
11. Bogart LM, Cowgill BO, Elliott MN, et al. A randomized controlled trial of Students for Nutrition and eXercise: A community-based participatory research study. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(3):415-422.
12. Kerner J, Rimer B, Emmons K. Introduction to the special section on dissemination: Dissemination research and research dissemination: How can we close the gap?. Health Psychol. 2005;24(5):443-446.
13. Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44(2):119-127.
14. Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow RE. Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(2):105-114.
15. Jenkinson KA, Naughton G, Benson AC. The GLAMA (Girls! Lead! Achieve! Mentor! Activate!) physical activity and peer leadership intervention pilot project: A process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:55.
16. Nigg C, Geller K, Adams P, Hamada M, Hwang P, Chung R. Successful dissemination of Fun 5 - A physical activity and nutrition program for children. Transl Behav Med. 2012;2(3):276-285.
17. Dunton GF, Lagloire R, Robertson T. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the statewide dissemination of a school-based physical activity and nutrition curriculum: "Exercise Your Options". Am J Health Promot. 2009;23(4):229-232.
18. Caperchione CM, Duncan M, Kolt GS, et al. Examining an Australian physical activity and nutrition intervention using RE-AIM. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(2):450-458.
19. Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(1):44-53.
20. Adams MA, Pelletier RL, Zive MM, Sallis JF. Salad bars and fruit and vegetable consumption in elementary schools: A plate waste study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(11):1789-1792.