Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 105-114

  Jilcott, Stephanie ^a   Ammerman, Alice ^a   Sommers, Janice ^a   Glasgow, Russell E ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^c Clinical Research Unit   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FOOD LABELING; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RISK FACTORS; TRANS FATTY ACIDS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 35148813109     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02872666     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Leet TL, Gillespie KN (eds): Evidence-Based Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
2. Stokols D, Allen J, Bellingham RL: The social ecology of health promotion: Implications for research and practice. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1996, 10:247-251.
3. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly. 1988, 15:351-377.
4. McKinlay J: The new public health approach to improving physical activity and autonomy in older populations. In Heinkkine E, Ruoppila I, Krusinen J (eds), Preparation for Aging. London: Plenum, 1995, 87-103.
5. Brownson RC, Gurney JG, Land GH: Evidence-based decision making in public health. Journal of Public Health Management Practice. 1999, 5:86-97.
6. Green LW, Kreuter MW: Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach (4th Ed). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 2005.
7. Heller RF, Page J: A population perspective to evidence based medicine: Evidence for population health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2002, 56:45-47.
8. Fuchs VR: The Future of Health Policy. Boston: First Harvard University Press, 1994.
9. Cole BR, Shimkhada R, Fielding JE, Kominski G, Morganstern H: Methodologies for realizing the potential of health impact assessment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005, 28:389.
10. Schmid TL, Pratt M, Witmer L: A framework for physical activity policy research. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2006, 3(Suppl. 1):S20-S29.
11. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health. 1999, 89:1322-1327.
12. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM: Evaluating the overall impact of health promotion programs: Using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Education & Research. 2006, 21:688-694.
13. Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE, Dzewaltowski D: Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005, 29: 66S-75S.
14. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P: The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004, 27:3-12.
15. Schmid TL, Pratt M, Howze E: Policy as intervention: Environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Public Health. 1995, 85:1207-1211.
16. Wallack L, Dorfman L, Jernigan D, Themba M: Media Advocacy and Public Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
17. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND Group: Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health. 2004, 94:361-366.
18. Glasgow RE: Translating research to practice: Lessons learned, areas for improvement, and future directions. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26:2451-2456.
19. Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Glasgow RE: TREND: An important step, but not enough. American Journal of Public Health. 2004, 94:1474.
20. Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations (5th Ed). New York: Free Press, 2003.
21. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC: Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy to effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health. 2003, 93:1261-1267.
22. Cheadle A, Psaty BM, Curry S, et al.: Community-level comparisons between the grocery store environment and individual dietary practices. Preventive Medicine. 1991, 20:250-261.
23. Williams AF: Passive and active measures for controlling disease and injury: The role of health psychologists. Health Psychology. 1982, 1:399-409.
24. Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M: Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998, 15:379-397.
25. Sallis JF, Cervero R, Ascher WW, et al.: An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health. 2006, 27:297-322.
26. Tengs TO, Osgood ND, Lin TH: Public health impact of changes in smoking behavior: Results from the Tobacco Policy Model. Medical Care. 2001, 39:1131-1141.
27. Joffe M, Mindell J: Complex causal process diagrams for analyzing the health impacts of policy interventions. American Journal of Public Health. 2006, 96:473-479.
28. Ritzwoller DP, Toobert D, Sukhanova A, Glasgow RE: Economic analysis of the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program for Postmenopausal women with diabetes. Diabetes Educator. 2006, 32:761-769.
29. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC: Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
30. Tengs TO, Ahmad S, Moore R, Gage E: Federal policy mandating safer cigarettes: A hypothetical simulation of the anticipated population health gains or losses. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2004, 23:289-290.
31. Stokols D: Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. The American Psychologist. 1992, 47:6-22.
32. Swinburn B, Gill T, Kumanyika S: Obesity prevention: A Proposed framework for translating evidence into action. Obesity Reviews. 2005, 6:23-33.
33. Choi BC, Pang T, Lin V, et al.: Can scientists and policy makers work together? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2005, 59:632-637.
34. Blamey A, Mutrie N, Aitchison T: Health promotion by encouraged use of stairs. British Medical Journal 1995, 311:289-390.
35. Stokols D: Social ecology and behavioral medicine: Implications for training, practice, and policy. Behavioral Medicine. 2000, 26:129-138.
36. Dearing JW: Improving the state of health programming by using diffusion theory. Journal of Health Communication. 2004, 9(Suppl. 1):21-36.
37. Rogers EM: A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of Health Communication. 2004, 9(Suppl. 1):13-19.
38. Retting RA, Williams AF, Farmer CM, Feldman AF: Evaluation of red light camera enforcement in Oxnard, California. Accident, Analysis and Prevention. 1999, 31:169-174.
39. Koplan JP, Dietz WH: Caloric imbalance and public health policy. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999, 282:1579-1581.
40. Puska P, Pirjo P, Ulla U: Influencing public nutrition for non-communicable disease prevention: From community intervention to national programme - Experiences from Finland. Public Health Nutrition. 2002, 5:245-251.
41. Puska P: Community-based prevention of cardiovascular disease: The North Karelia Project. In Martarazzo JD, Weiss SM, Herd JA, Miller NE (eds), Behavioral Health: A Handbook of Health Enhancement and Disease Prevention. New York: Wiley, 1984, 1140-1147.
42. Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM: Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2000, 22:223-228.
43. Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, King D, et al.: Robustness of a computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention across patient characteristics, healthcare settings, and intervention staff. American Journal of Managed Care. 2006, 12:137-145.
44. Estabrooks PA, Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM: School-based health promotion: Issues related to translating research into practice. Journal of School Health. 2002, 73:21-28.
45. Bull SS, Gillette C, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks P: Worksite health promotion research: To what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice? Health Education and Behavior. 2002, 30: 537-549.
46. Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Bull S, Glasgow RE: Behavior change intervention research in community settings: How generalizable are the results? Health Promotion International. 2004, 19:235-245.
47. Besculides M, Zaveri H, Farris R, Will J: Identifying best practices for WISEWOMAN programs using a mixed-methods evaluation. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2006, 3:1-9.
48. Glasgow RE: Evaluation of theory-based interventions: The RE-AIM model. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds), Health Behavior and Health Education (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Wiley, 2002, 531-544.
49. Kingdon J: Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper Collins, 1995.
50. Glasgow RE: eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2007, 32:S119-S126.
51. Rotheram-Borus MJ, Flannery D, Duan N: Interventions that are CURRES: Cost-effective, useful, realistic, robust, evolving, and sustainable. In Rehmschmidt H, Belfer M, Goodyear I (eds), Facilitating Pathways: Care, Treatment, and Prevention in Child and Adolescent Health. New York: Springer, 2004, 235-244.