Predicting land use/land cover changes using a CA-Markov model under two different scenarios

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2018, Pages

  Hamad, Rahel ^a   Balzter, Heiko ^b   Kolo, Kamal ^a  

^a SORAN UNIVERSITY   (Iraq)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Business as usual scenario; CA Markov module; Halgurd Sakran National Park; Land change modeller; Modelling LULC change

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALGORITHM; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MARKOV CHAIN; MODELING; NATIONAL PARK; PREDICTION; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SCENARIO ANALYSIS;

IRAQ; KURDISTAN [IRAQ];

EID: 85053853854     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su10103421     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Roy, S.; Farzana, K.; Papia, M.; Hasan, M. Monitoring and prediction of land use/land cover change using the integration of Markov chain model and cellular automation in the Southeastern Tertiary Hilly Area of Bangladesh. Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res. 2015, 24, 125-148
2. Meles, K.H. Temporal and Spatial Changes in Land Use Patterns and Biodiversity in Relation to Farm Productivity at Multiple Scales in Tigray, Ethiopia; Wageningen Universiteit: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2008
3. Hamad, R.; Kolo, K.; Balzter, H. Land Cover Changes Induced by Demining Operations in Halgurd-Sakran National Park in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2422
4. Singh, S.K.; Mustak, S.; Srivastava, P.K.; Szabó, S.; Islam, T. Predicting spatial and decadal LULC changes through cellular automata Markov chain models using earth observation datasets and geo-information. Environ. Process. 2015, 2, 61-78
5. Ali, H. Land Use and Land Cover Change, Drivers and Its Impact: A Comparative Study from Kuhar Michael and Lenche Dima of Blue Nile and Awash Basins of Ethiopia; Cornell University: New York, NY, USA, 2009
6. Gibson, G.R. War and Agriculture: Three Decades of Agricultural Land Use and Land Cover Change in Iraq; University Libraries, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2012
7. Dezhkam, S.; Amiri, B.J.; Darvishsefat, A.A.; Sakieh, Y. Performance evaluation of land change simulation models using landscape metrics. Geocarto Int. 2017, 32, 655-677
8. Regmi, R.; Saha, S.; Balla, M. Geospatial analysis of land use land cover change predictive modeling at Phewa LakeWatershed of Nepal. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Tech. 2014, 4, 2617-2627
9. Omar, N.Q.; Sanusi, S.A.; Hussin, W.M.; Samat, N.; Mohammed, K.S. Markov-CA model using analytical hierarchy process and multiregression technique. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2014
10. Hamad, R.; Kolo, K.; Balzter, H. Post-war land cover changes and fragmentation in Halgurd Sakran National Park (HSNP), Kurdistan region of Iraq. Land 2018, 7, 38
11. United Nations-Office of the Iraq Programme_Oil-for-Food Programme. Available online: http://www.un. org/Depts/oip/background/ (accessed on 25 April 2018)
12. Lortz, M.G. Willing to Face Death: A History of Kurdish Military Forces-The Peshmerga-From the Ottoman Empire to Present-Day Iraq; Florida State University: Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2005
13. Olmedo, M.T.C.; Pontius, R.G., Jr.; Paegelow, M.; Mas, J.-F. Comparison of simulation models in terms of quantity and allocation of land change. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 69, 214-221
14. Liu, Y.; Dai, L.; Xiong, H. Simulation of urban expansion patterns by integrating auto-logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2015, 58, 1113-1136
15. Fan, F.; Weng, Q.; Wang, Y. Land use and land cover change in Guangzhou, China, from 1998 to 2003, based on Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery. Sensors 2007, 7, 1323-1342
16. Brown, D.G.; Walker, R.; Manson, S.; Seto, K. Modeling land use and land cover change. Land Chang. Sci. 2004
17. Land Change Modeler in TerrSet. Available online: https://clarklabs.org/terrset/land-change-modeler/ (accessed on 25 May 2018)
18. Megahed, Y.; Cabral, P.; Silva, J.; Caetano, M. Land cover mapping analysis and urban growth modelling using remote sensing techniques in greater Cairo region-Egypt. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2015, 4, 1750-1769
19. Mishra, V.N.; Rai, P.K.; Mohan, K. Prediction of land use changes based on land change modeler (LCM) using remote sensing: A case study of Muzaffarpur (Bihar), India. J. Geogr. Inst. Jovan Cvijic SASA 2014, 64, 111-127
20. Krishna Rajan, D. Understanding the Drivers Affecting Land Use Change in Ecuador: An Application of the Land Change Modeler Software. Available online: https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/3740 (accessed on 17 September 2018)
21. Veldkamp, A.; Lambin, E.F. Predicting land-use change. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 85, 1-6
22. Moulds, S.; Buytaert, W.; Mijic, A. An open and extensible framework for spatially explicit land use change modelling: The lulcc R package. Geosci. Model Dev. 2015, 8, 3215-3229
23. Ozturk, D. Urban growth simulation of atakum (Samsun, Turkey) using cellular automata-Markov chain and multi-layer perceptron-markov chain models. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 5918-5950
24. Parsa, V.A.; Yavari, A.; Nejadi, A. Spatio-temporal analysis of land use/land cover pattern changes in Arasbaran Biosphere Reserve: Iran. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2016, 2, 1-13
25. Mondal, M.S.; Sharma, N.; Garg, P.K.; Kappas, M. Statistical independence test and validation of CA Markov land use land cover (LULC) prediction results. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2016, 19, 259-272
26. The USGS Global Visualization Viewer. Available online: https://glovis.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 15May 2018)
27. The R Project for Statistical Computing. 2013. Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 15 July 2018)
28. Hamad, R.; Balzter, H.; Kolo, K. Multi-criteria assessment of land cover dynamic changes in halgurd sakran national park (HSNP), kurdistan region of Iraq, using remote sensing and GIS. Land 2017, 6, 18
29. Congalton, R.G.; Green, K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008
30. TerrSet Geospatial Monitoring and Modeling System-Manual. Available online: https://clarklabs.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2016/10/Terrset-Manual.pdf/ (accessed on 5 May 2018)
31. Weng, Q. Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling. J. Environ. Manag. 2002, 64, 273-284
32. Nouri, J.; Gharagozlou, A.; Arjmandi, R.; Faryadi, S.; Adl, M. Predicting urban land use changes using a CA-Markov model. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2014, 39, 5565-5573
33. Hua, A. Application of Ca-Markov model and land use/land cover changes in Malacca RiverWatershed, Malaysia. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2017, 15, 605-622
34. Ghosh, P.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Chanda, A.; Mondal, P.; Akhand, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Nayak, S.K.; Ghosh, S.; Mitra, D.; Ghosh, T.; et al. Application of Cellular automata and Markov-chain model in geospatial environmental modeling-A review. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2017, 5, 64-77
35. Yang, X.; Zheng, X.-Q.; Chen, R. A land use change model: Integrating landscape pattern indexes and Markov-CA. Ecol. Model. 2014, 283, 1-7
36. Subedi, P.; Subedi, K.; Thapa, B. Application of a hybrid cellular automaton-Markov (CA-Markov) Model in land-use change prediction: A case study of saddle creek drainage Basin, Florida. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2013, 1, 126-132
37. Burnham, B.O. Markov intertemporal land use simulation model. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 1973, 5, 253-258
38. Kumar, S.; Radhakrishnan, N.; Mathew, S. Land use change modelling using a Markov model and remote sensing. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2014, 5, 145-156
39. Behera, M.; Borate, S.N.; Panda, S.N.; Behera, P.R.; Roy, P.S. Modelling and analyzing the watershed dynamics using Cellular Automata (CA)-Markov model-A geo-information based approach. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 121, 1011-1024
40. Sang, L.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.; Zhu, D.; Yun, W. Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA-Markov model. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 54, 938-943
41. Turner, M.G. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20, 171-197
42. Nadoushan, M.A.; Soffianian, A.; Alebrahim, A. Modeling land use/cover changes by the combination of markov chain and cellular automata markov (CA-Markov) models. J. Earth Environ. Health Sci. 2015, 1, 16-21
43. Eastman, J.R. TerrSet manual. Access. TerrSet Vers. 2015, 18, 1-390
44. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. A dynamic modeling approach to simulating socioeconomic effects on landscape changes. Ecol. Model. 2001, 140, 141-162
45. Pontius, G.R.; Malanson, J. Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2005, 19, 243-265
46. Ye, B.; Bai, Z. Simulating land use/cover changes of Nenjiang County based on CA-Markov model. Comput. Comput. Technol. Agric. 2008, 1, 321-329
47. Reddy, C.S.; Singh, S.; Dadhwal, V.K.; Jha, C.S.; Rao, N.R.; Diwakar, P.G. Predictive modelling of the spatial pattern of past and future forest cover changes in India. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 126
48. Ahmed, B. Land Cover Change Prediction of Dhaka City: A Markov Cellular Automata Approach. 2011. Available online: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1419016/ (accessed on 26 August 2018)
49. Adhikari, S.; Southworth, J. Simulating forest cover changes of Bannerghatta National Park based on a CA-Markov model: A remote sensing approach. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 3215-3243
50. Mandal, U.K. Geo-information Based Spatio-temporal Modeling of Urban Land Use and Land Cover Change in Butwal Municipality, Nepal. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014, 40, 809
51. Chen, L.; Nuo, W. Dynamic simulation of land use changes in Port city: A case study of Dalian, China. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 96, 981-992
52. Pontius, R.G.; Schneider, L.C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 85, 239-248
53. Sayemuzzaman, M.; Jha, M. Modeling of future land cover land use change in North Carolina using Markov chain and cellular automata model. Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2014, 7, 295-306
54. Pontius, R.G. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2000, 66, 1011-1016
55. Eastman, J.R. IDRISI Andes Tutorial; Clark Labs: Worcester, MA, USA, 2006
56. Samie, A.; Deng, X.; Siqi, J.; Chen, D. Scenario-based simulation on dynamics of land-use-land-cover change in Punjab Province, Pakistan. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1285
57. Singh, A.K. Modelling Land Use Land Cover Changes Using Cellular Automata in a Geo-Spatial Environment; International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation: Enschede, The Netherlands, 2003; Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b8b3/5045349ac793a98605ba4c0710c11b76aed3. pdf (accessed on 17 September 2018)