Playing the system: incentives to ‘game’ and educational ethics in school examination entry policies in England

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 545-562

  Ingram, Jenni ^a   Elliott, Victoria ^a   Morin, Caroline ^b   Randhawa, Ashmita ^a   Brown, Carol ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation   (United Kingdom)

^c OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

examination entries; gaming; GCSE; Qualifications

Indexed keywords

EID: 85053853197     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: 14653915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2018.1496906     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baird, J.-A., Ahmed, A., Hopfenbeck, T., Brown, C., & Elliott, V., (2013). Research evidence relating to proposals for reform of the GCSE: OUCEA Report. Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
2. Beck, U. (1992). The risk society. Oxford, London: Sage Publications.
3. Behn, R. D., (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606.
4. De Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. J. G., (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396.
5. Department for Education (2014). Factsheet: Progress 8 measure. London, UK. Retrieved from. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/285990/P8_factsheet.pdf
6. Dunne, M., Humphreys, S., & Sebba, J., 2007. Effective teaching and learning for pupils in low attaining groups. Nottingham, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families. Retrieved from. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6622/1/DCSF-RR011.pdf
7. Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. S., (2006). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system? In T. J., Gronberg & D. W., Jansen (ed.), Improving School Accountability (Advances in Applied Microeconomics, Volume 14 (pp. 35–49). Amsterdam: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
8. Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D., (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Johnson, S., (2013). On the reliability of high-stakes teacher assessment. Research Papers in Education, 28(1), 91–105.
10. NAO. 2003. Making a difference: Performance of maintained secondary schools in England. London: National Audit Office. Retrieved from. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2003/11/02031332.pdf
11. Noyes, A., Drake, P., Wake, G., & Murphy, R., (2010). Evaluating mathematics pathways: Final report. London: DfE.
12. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013a). Our announcement on speaking and listening assessments. Retrieved from https://ofqual.blog.gov.uk/2013/09/04/our-announcement-on-speaking-and-listening-assessments/
13. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013b). Review of controlled assessment in GCSEs. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/377903/2013-06-11-review-of-controlled-assessment-in-GCSEs.pdf
14. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013c). GCSE reform consultation. In June 2013. Coventry: Ofqual.
15. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2013d). GCSE reform consultation. June 2013. Coventry: Ofqual. Website: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141110161313/http://www.ofqual.gov.uk/files/2013-06-11-gcse-reform-consultation-june-2013.pdf
16. Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2017). GCSE mathematics: Understanding schools’ approaches to tiering. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/591000/2017-02-10_Report_on_maths_tiering.pdf
17. Ofsted. (2013). Schools’ use of early entry to GCSE examinations: Its usage and impact. Manchester: Author.
18. Perryman, J, Ball, S, Maguire, M, & Braun, A., (2011). Life in the pressure cooker–school league tables and english and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.
19. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great american school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
20. Riddell, S., & Weedon, E., (2006). What counts as a reasonable adjustment? Dyslexic students and the concept of fair assessment. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 16(1), 57–73.
21. Smith, P., (1993). Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector. British Journal of Management, 4, 135–151.
22. Strand, S., (2012). The White British–Black Caribbean achievement gap: Tests, tiers and teacher expectations. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 75–101.
23. Sturman, L., (2003). Teaching to the test: Science or intuition? Educational Research, 45, 261–273.
24. Taylor, R. C., (2016). The effects of accountability measures in English secondary schools: Early and multiple entry to GCSE mathematics assessments. Oxford Review of Education, 42, 629–645.
25. Vidal Rodeiro, C. L., & Nádas, R., (2010). Effects of modularisation. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment.
26. Wilson, D., Croxson, B., & Atkinson, A., (2006). “what gets measured gets done” Headteachers’ responses to the English secondary school performance management system. Policy Studies, 27(2), 153–171.