|
Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 659-660
|
Negative trials in critical care: why most research is probably wrong
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
SIMVASTATIN;
ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME;
BREAST CANCER;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT;
FALSE POSITIVE RESULT;
HUMAN;
INTENSIVE CARE;
MORTALITY RATE;
NOTE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROBABILITY THEORY;
PROSTATE CANCER;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);
SAMPLE SIZE;
SCREENING TEST;
SEPSIS;
THERAPY EFFECT;
TREATMENT RESPONSE;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
METHODOLOGY;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
CRITICAL CARE;
HUMANS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
|
EID: 85053816603
PISSN: 22132600
EISSN: 22132619
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30279-0 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (62)
|
References (6)
|