The myopic panopticon: The social consequences of policing through the lens

Policing and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 43-58

  Leman Langlois, Stéphane ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

CCTV; Militarization; Policing; Public order; Social control; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

EID: 85053488322     PISSN: 10439463     EISSN: 14772728     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1043946022000005617     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brin, Ditvid. 1996. The Transparent Society Wired. www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/fftransparent.html
2. Brodeur, Jean-Paul. 1988. Order Public et Ordre Privé. Revue Internationale de Criminology., 41: 392–410.
3. Brodeur, Jean-Paul. 1991. Poliver l' apparence. Revue Candienna: de Criminologie Canadian Journal of Criminology, 33(3-4): 285–332.
4. Coleman, Roy, and Sim, Joe. 2000. 'You'll never walk alone': CCTV surveillance, order and neo-liberal rule in Liverpool city centre. British Journal of Sociology, 512(4): 623–639.
5. Dillon, Jason. 1999. The Effect of Closed Circuit Television Cameras on Recorded Crime Rates and Public Concern abou Crime in Glasgon: The Scottish Office Central, Research Unit Main Findings. No. 30 4
6. Ditton, Jason. 2000. Crime and the city: public attitudes towards open-street CCTV in Glasgow. British Journal of Criminology, 40: 692–709.
7. Ditlon, Jason, and Short, Emma. 1999. Yes. it works no. it doesn't computing the effects of open-street CCTV in two adjacent town centres. Crime Prevention Studies, 10: 201–223.
8. Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Gordon, Diana. 1987. The electronic panopticon: u case study of the development of the national crime records system. Politics s and Society, 15(4): 483–511.
10. Haggerty, Kevin, and Ericson, Richard. 1999. The militarization of policing in ith information age. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 27 Winter: 233–55.
11. Home Office. 1993. Understanding Car Park. Crime and Cctr: Evaluation Lessons from Safer Cities, Police Research Group Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper No. 42 London: Home Office Police Department.
12. International Biometric Industry Association (IBIA). 2001. Biometrics ami Counter-Terrorism: A Statement by the Board of Directors of the International Biometric Industry Assosiation (IBlA) http://www.ibia.org/ Press%20Release%209.2l.01.htm
13. Krakaa, Peter. 1999. Militarizing criminal justice: exploring the possibilities. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 27 winter: 205–215.
14. Kraksa, Peter. 1999b. Questioning the militarisation of US police. Policing and Society, 9(2): 141–157.
15. Mar, Gary T., 1988. La société de sécurité maximale. Deviance et Societè., 12(2): 147–166.
16. Nock, Steven I., 1993. The Casts of Privacy. Surveillonce and Reputation in America, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
17. Norris, Clive, and Armstrong, Gary. 1999. The Maximum Surveillance Society: the Rise of CCTV, New York: Berg.
18. Nunn, Samuel. 2001. Police technology in cities: changes and challenges. Technology in Society, 23: 11–27.
19. Poster, Mark. 1990. The Mode of Information: Poststrueturalism and Social Context, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Poulsen, Kevin. 2001. Face-off over super bowl spying. Security Focus http://www.securityfocus.com/ news/170
21. Shearing, Clifford D., and Stenning, Philip. 1981. Modern Private Security: Its Growth and Implleation M. Tonry and N. Morris. Crime anil Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 139–245. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Skogan, Wesley G., 1990. Disorder ami Decline, New York: The Free Press.
23. Willams, Katherine, and Johnstone, Craig. 2000. The polilics of the selective gaze closed circuit television and the policing of public space. Crime, Law and Social Change, 34: 183–210.
24. Woodward, John. 2001. Super Bowl Snrveillance facing up to Biometics, Santa Monicn: Rand Arroyo Centre.