Performance of multitarget stool DNA testing in African American patients

Cancer

Volumn 124, Issue 19, 2018, Pages 3876-3880

  Cooper, Gregory S ^a,b   Markowitz, Sanford D ^a,b   Chen, Zhengyi ^a   Tuck, Missy ^c   Willis, Joseph E ^a,b   Berger, Barry M ^d   Brenner, Dean E ^c   Li, Li ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d Exact Sciences Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

African Americans; colon polyps diagnosis; colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasms diagnosis; DNA analysis; early detection of cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DNA DETERMINATION; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTITARGET STOOL DNA TESTING; OHIO; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RACE DIFFERENCE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADENOMA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; ETHNOLOGY; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; MASS SCREENING; MULTICENTER STUDY; OCCULT BLOOD; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY;

DNA;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DNA, NEOPLASM; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85052917859     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31660     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2017: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:100-121
2. Liss DT, Baker DW. Understanding current racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States: the contribution of socioeconomic status and access to care. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46:228-236
3. Carethers JM. Screening for colorectal cancer in African Americans: determinants and rationale for an earlier age to commence screening. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:711-721
4. Agrawal A, Bhupinderjit A, Bhutani M, et al. Committee of Minority Affairs and Cultural Diversity, American College of Gastroenterology. Colorectal cancer in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:515-523
5. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1287-1297
6. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ. Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573-577
7. DeSantis C, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:151-166
8. Soneji S, Iyer SS, Armstrong K, Asch DA. Racial disparities in stage-specific colorectal cancer mortality: 1960–2005. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1912-1916
9. Abola MV, Fennimore TF, Chen MM, Chen Z, Cooper G, Li L. Stool DNA versus colonoscopy based colorectal cancer screening: patient perceptions and preferences. Fam Med Comm Health. 2015;3:2-8
10. Redwood DG, Asay ED, Blake ID, et al. Stool DNA testing for screening detection of colorectal neoplasia in Alaska native people. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:61-70
11. Finney Rutten LJ, Jacobson RM, Wilson PM, et al. Early adoption of a multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:726-733
12. Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:307-323
13. Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343-350