Unleashing the Power of Networks: Shareholder Activism, Sustainable Development and Corporate Environmental Policy

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 712-727

  Yang, Aimei ^a   Uysal, Nur ^b   Taylor, Maureen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

CSR; environmental management; shareholder activism; social network analysis; stakeholder engagement; stakeholder theory; sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUE; EMPOWERMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85052742046     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2026     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bonacich P. 1987. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology 92(5): 1170–1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631
2. Bonner JM, Kim D, Cavusgil ST. 2005. Self-perceived strategic network identity and its effects on market performance in alliance relationships. Journal of Business Research 58(10): 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.002
3. Castells M. 2007. Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communications 1(1): 238–266.
4. Clark CE, Crawford EP. 2012. Influencing climate change policy: the effect of shareholder pressure and firm environmental performance. Business and Society 51(1): 148–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311427594
5. Cormier D, Magnan M. 2015. The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: an empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment 24(6): 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1829
6. Diani M, McAdam D (Eds). 2003. Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
7. van Dijk J. 2006. The Network Society, 2nd edition. London: SAGE.
8. Doerfel ML, Taylor M. 2004. Network dynamics of inter organizational cooperation: the Croatian civil society movement. Communication Monographs 71(4): 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000307470
9. Domenec F. 2012. The ‘greening’ of the annual letters published by Exxon, Chevron and BP between 2003 and 2009. Journal of Communication Management 16(3): 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211245767
10. Doménech T, Davies M. 2011. The role of embeddedness in industrial symbiosis networks: phases in the evolution of industrial symbiosis networks. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(5): 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.695
11. Donaldson T, Preston LE. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271992
12. Faulkner D, de Rond M. 2000. Perspectives on cooperative strategy. In Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business and Organizational Issues, Faulkner D, de Rond M (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 3–39.
13. Freeman IL. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston, MA.
14. Friedman AL, Miles S. 2002. Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies 39(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280
15. Frooman J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(2): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1893928
16. Frooman J, Murrell AJ. 2005. Stakeholder influence strategies: the roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business and Society 44(1): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650304273434
17. Galbreath J. 2010. Corporate governance practices that address climate change: an exploratory study. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(5): 335–350.
18. Goerzen A, Beamish PW. 2005. The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 26(4): 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.447
19. Gomez-Carrasco P, Michelon G. 2017. The power of stakeholders’ voice: the effects of social media activism on stock markets. Business Strategy and the Environment 26(6): 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1973
20. Goranova M, Ryan LV. 2015. Shareholder empowerment: an introduction. In Shareholder Empowerment, Goranova M, Ryan M, Verstegen L (eds). Palgrave Macmillan: New York; 1–32.
21. Gulati R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19(4): 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4%3C293::AID-SMJ982%3E3.0.CO;2-M
22. Hyatt DG, Berente N. 2017. Substantive or symbolic environmental strategies? Effects of external and internal normative stakeholder pressures. Business Strategy and the Environment https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1979
23. Jacobsen GD. 2011. The Al Gore effect: an inconvenient truth and voluntary carbon offsets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61(1): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.08.002
24. Kelly A. 2015. Uzbekistan accused of brutal crackdown on activists investigating forced labour. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/oct/21/uzbekistan-forced-labour-cotton-harvest-violent-crackdown-activists [Retrieved 17 December, 2015
25. Kenis P, Knoke D. 2002. How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 275–293. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.6588029
26. Logsdon JM, Van Buren HJ. 2008. Justice and large corporations: what do activist shareholders want? Business and Society 47(4): 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650308316524
27. Malinick TE, Tindall DB, Diani M. 2013. Network centrality and social movement media coverage: A two-mode network analytic approach. Social Networks 35(2): 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.005
28. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105
29. Monks R, Miller A, Cook J. 2004. Shareholder activism on environmental issues: A study of proposals at large US corporations (2000-2003). Natural Resources Forum 28(4): 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00104.x
30. O’Connor A, Shumate M. 2014. Differences among NGOs in the business–NGO cooperative network. Business and Society 53(1): 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311418195
31. O’Rourke A. 2003. A new politics of engagement: shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(4): 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.364
32. Proffitt WT, Spicer A. 2006. Shaping the shareholder activism agenda: institutional investors and global social issues. Strategic Organization 4(2): 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127006064067
33. Reid EM, Toffel MW. 2009. Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal 30(11): 1157–1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.796
34. Robins G, Snijders T, Wang P, Handcock M, Pattison P. 2007. Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29(2): 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.003
35. Rowley TJ. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 887–910. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022107
36. Rowley TI, Moldoveanu M. 2003. When will stakeholders groups act? An interest and identity based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 204–219. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416080
37. Shalizi CR, Thomas AC. 2011. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods & Research 40(2): 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124111404820
38. Shumate M, Lipp J. 2008. Connective collective action online: An examination of the hyperlink network structure of an NGO issue network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(1): 178–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01436.x
39. Shumate M, O’Connor A. 2010. Corporate reporting of cross-sector alliances: the portfolio of NGO partners communicated on corporate websites. Communication Monographs 77(2): 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758201
40. Shumate M, Fulk J, Monge P. 2005. Predictors of the International HIV–AIDS INGO Network over time. Human Communication Research 31(4): 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00880.x
41. Sjöström E. 2008. Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: what do we know? Sustainable Development 16(3): 141–154.
42. Snijders TAB, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Handcock MS. 2006. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology 36(1): 99–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00176.x
43. Uysal N. 2014. The expanded role of investor relations: socially responsible investing, shareholder activism, and organizational legitimacy. International Journal of Strategic Communication 8(3): 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2014.905478
44. Uzzi B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61(4): 674–698. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096399
45. Wasserman S, Faust K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
46. Waygood S, Wehrmeyer W. 2003. A critical assessment of how non-governmental organizations use the capital markets to achieve their aims: a UK study. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(6): 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.377
47. Xu XD, Zeng SX, Zou HL, Shi JJ. 2016. The impact of corporate environmental violation on shareholders’ wealth: a perspective taken from media coverage. Business Strategy and the Environment 25(2): 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1858
48. Yang A, Taylor M. 2015. Looking over, looking out, and moving forward: a network ecology framework to position public relations in communication theory. Communication Theory 25(1): 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12049
49. Zald MN, Berger MA. 1978. Social movements in organizations: coup d’état, insurgency, and mass movements. American Journal of Sociology 83(4): 823–861. https://doi.org/10.1086/226634