Sampling considerations for a potential Zika virus urosurvey in New York City

Epidemiology and Infection

Volumn 146, Issue 13, 2018, Pages 1628-1634

  Thompson, C N ^a   Lee, C T ^a,b   Immerwahr, S ^c   Resnick, S ^c   Culp, G ^c   Greene, S K ^a  

^a NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^c NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE   (United States)

Author keywords

Local transmission; sampling; urosurvey; Zika virus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AEDES; ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; NEW YORK; NONHUMAN; POPULATION SIZE; PREVALENCE; RESIDENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URBAN AREA; URINE SAMPLING; ZIKA VIRUS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH SURVEY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PROCEDURES; URINE; VIROLOGY; ZIKA FEVER;

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; HUMANS; NEW YORK CITY; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREVALENCE; SAMPLING STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINE; ZIKA VIRUS; ZIKA VIRUS INFECTION;

EID: 85052551725     PISSN: 09502688     EISSN: 14694409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818002236     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Rasmussen SA et al. (2016) Zika virus and birth defects-reviewing the evidence for causality. The New England Journal of Medicine 374, 1981-1987.
2. Santos TD et al. (2016) Zika virus and the Guillain-Barré syndrome-case series from seven countries. The New England Journal of Medicine 375, 1598-1601.
3. WHO (World Health Organization) (2017) Table 1: ZIKV classification. In Zika Virus Classification Table, Updated April 2017. Geneva: WHO. Available at http://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/classification-Table-13-April-2017/en/(Accessed 06 November 2016).
4. Likos A et al. (2016) Local mosquito-borne transmission of Zika virus-Miami-dade and broward counties, Florida, June-August 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65, 1032-1038.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Zika Cases in the United States. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/zika/reporting/casecounts.html (Accessed 19 May 2017).
6. Bajwa W et al. (2016) Comprehensive Mosquito Surveillance and Control Plan. New York, New York, USA: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Available at https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/wnv/2016/wnvplan2016.pdf. (Accessed 10 January 2017).
7. Gardner L, Chen N and Sarkar A (2017) Vector status of Aedes species determines geographic risk of autochthonous Zika virus establishment. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 11, e0005487.
8. Azar SR et al. (2017) Differential vector competency of Aedes albopictus populations from the Americas for Zika virus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 97, 330-339.
9. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (2017) Reported Cases of Zika in New York City. In Health Topics: Zika Virus. Available at http://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/health-Topics/zika-virus.page (Accessed 11 June 2017).
10. WHO (World Health Organization) Regional Office for Europe (2016) Zika virus vectors and the risk of spread in the WHO European Region. In Vector surveillance and control, Updated March 2016. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Available at http://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/classification-Table-13-April-2017/en/(Accessed 11 June 2017).
11. Jupille H et al. (2016) Zika virus, a New threat for Europe? PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, e0004901.
12. Lee CT, et al. et al. (2016) Zika virus surveillance and preparedness-New York city, 2015-2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65, 629-635.
13. Wahnich A, Lall R andWeiss D (2016) Monitoring for local transmission of Zika virus using emergency department data. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics 9, e115.
14. Greene SK, Lim S and Fine AD (2017) Identifying Areas at Greatest Risk for Zika Virus Importation-New York City, 2016. In Annual Conference: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Boise, Idaho, USA.
15. Gourinat A-C et al. (2015) Detection of Zika virus in urine. Emerging Infectious Diseases 21, 84-86.
16. Priyamvada L et al. (2016) Human antibody responses after dengue virus infection are highly cross-reactive to Zika virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 7852-7857.
17. Brent C et al. (2016) Preliminary findings from an investigation of Zika virus infection in a patient with No known risk factors-utah, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65, 981-982.
18. New York City Department of City Planning (2017) New York City Population, Population Facts. In NYC Planning Data/Maps. Available at https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/data-maps/nyc-population/populationfacts.page. (Accessed 03 March 2017).
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Interim CDC Recommendations for Zika Vector Control in the Continental United States. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/zika/public-health-partners/vector-control-us.html (Accessed 03 December 2017).
20. Marini F et al. (2010) Study of Aedes albopictus dispersal in Rome, Italy, using sticky traps in mark-release-recapture experiments. Medical Veterinary Entomology 24, 361-368.
21. New York City Department of Emergency Management (2014). Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled v. City of New York, Docket No. 11-CV-6690-JMF. In Notice of Settlement of Class Action Lawsuit, United States District Court Southern District of New York. Available at https://www1.nyc.gov/site/em/about/mous-settlement-docs/bcid-class-notice.page (Accessed 23 December 2017).
22. New York City Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications (2018). NYC Address Points. In NYC Open Data. Available at https://data.cityofnewyork.us/City-Government/NYC-Address-Points/g6pj-hd8k (Accessed 13 February 2018).
23. Melissa Global Intelligence (2014) United States Postal Service address data. In Melissa Global Intelligences Custom Address Table, Updated 20 September 2016 as edited and distributed by New York City Emergency Management, Geographic Information Systems Department.
24. New York City Department of City Planning (2010) Decennial Census-Census 2010. In NYC Planning Data/Maps. Available at https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/data-maps/nyc-population/census-2010.page (Accessed 17 August 2017).
25. NCSS, LLC (2014) Tests for One Proportion. In PASS 13 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software. Kaysville, Utah, USA. Available at https://www.ncss.com/software/pass/.
26. Cameron AR and Baldock FC (1998) A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedomfromdisease. Preventive VeterinaryMedicine 34, 1-17.
27. Ziller M et al. (2002) Analysis of sampling strategies to substantiate freedom from disease in large areas. Preventive Veterinary medicine 52, 333-343.
28. Kopacka I (2015) Package to substantiate freedom from disease in R using two-stage sampling. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FFD/vignettes/FFD-intro.pdf (Accessed 24 October 2016).
29. Kopacka I (2015) FFD package, v1.0-6. In The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FFD/index.html (Accessed 24 October 2016).
30. Wang W (2015) Exact optimal confidence intervals for hypergeometric parameters. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110, 1491-1499.
31. Korn E and Graubard B (1998) Confidence intervals for proportions with small expected number of positive counts from survey data. Survey Methodology 24, 193-201.
32. United States Food and Drug Administration (2016) Zika Virus Emergency Use Authorization. In Emergency Situations (Medical Devices). Available at https://www.fda.gov/EmergencyPreparedness/Counterterrorism/MedicalCountermeasures/MCMLegalRegulatoryandPolicyFramework/ucm182568.htm#zika (Accessed 02 March 2018).
33. Mostashari F et al. (2001) Epidemic West Nile encephalitis, New York, 1999: results of a household-based seroepidemiological survey. The Lancet 358, 261-264.
34. Chan T-C et al. (2018) Using an Open GIS Framework and Epidemiological Intelligence for Dengue Surveillance. In Annual Conference: International Society for Disease Surveillance. Orlando, Florida, USA. Available at https://www.surveillancerepository.org/using-open-gis-framework-And-epidemiological-intelligence-dengue-surveillance.
35. Paz-Bailey G et al. (2017) Persistence of Zika virus in body fluids-preliminary report. The New England Journal of Medicine. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613108.
36. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Overview of Zika Virus Testing, July 24, 2017. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/zika/laboratories/lab-guidance.html (Accessed 11 December 2017).
37. Obenauer P et al. (2009). Host-Seeking height preferences of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in North Central Florida suburban and sylvatic locales. Journal of Medical Entomology 46, 900-908.
38. Pan American Health Organization (2017) Regional Zika Epidemiological Update (Americas), August 25, 2017. Available at http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com-content&view=article&id=11599:regional-zikaepidemiological-update-Americas&Itemid=41691 (Accessed 10 October 2017).
39. New York City Department of City Planning (2016) PLUTO and MapPLUTO Archive. In NYC Planning Data/Maps. Available at https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/data-maps/open-data/pluto-mappluto-Archive.page (Accessed 20 July 2017).