Association between age, deprivation and specific comorbid conditions and the receipt of major surgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in England: A population-based study

Thorax

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 51-59

  Belot, Aurélien ^a   Fowler, Helen ^a   Njagi, Edmund Njeru ^a   Luque Fernandez, Miguel Angel ^a   Maringe, Camille ^a   Magadi, Winnie ^a   Exarchakou, Aimilia ^a   Quaresma, Manuela ^a   Turculet, Adrian ^a   Peake, Michael D ^b,c,d   Navani, Neal ^d,e   Rachet, Bernard ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

comorbidities; lung cancer; population based data; socioeconomic inequalities; surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HUMAN; NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER; ODDS RATIO; POPULATION RESEARCH; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; VERY ELDERLY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEALTH STATUS; HEART FAILURE; LUNG SURGERY; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POVERTY; PROGNOSIS; SECONDARY; SEX FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; COMORBIDITY; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POVERTY; PROGNOSIS; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; PULMONARY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 85052402024     PISSN: 00406376     EISSN: 14683296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211395     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Smittenaar CR, Petersen KA, Stewart K, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality projections in the UK until 2035. Br J Cancer 2016;115:1147-55.
2. Magadi W, Exarchakou A, Rachet B, et al. Cancer survival in England: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 and followed up to 2015. Wales: Newport, 2016.
3. Rachet B, Ellis L, Maringe C, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England after the NHS cancer plan. Br J Cancer 2010;103:446-53.
4. Riaz SP, Horton M, Kang J, et al. Lung cancer incidence and survival in England: An analysis by socioeconomic deprivation and urbanization. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:2005-10.
5. Ellis L, Coleman MP, Rachet B. How many deaths would be avoidable if socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England were eliminated? A national populationbased study, 1996-2006. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:270-8.
6. Macleod U, Mitchell E, Black M, et al. Comorbidity and socioeconomic deprivation: An observational study of the prevalence of comorbidity in general practice. Eur J Gen Pract 2004;10:24-6.
7. McLean G, Gunn J, Wyke S, et al. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on multimorbidity at different ages: A cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract 2014;64:e440-7.
8. Riaz SP, Lüchtenborg M, Jack RH, et al. Variation in surgical resection for lung cancer in relation to survival: Population-based study in England 2004-2006. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:54-60.
9. Berglund A, Lambe M, Lüchtenborg M, et al. Social differences in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: A cohort study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001048.
10. Forrest LF, White M, Rubin G, et al. The role of patient, tumour and system factors in socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer treatment: Population-based study. Br J Cancer 2014;111:608-18.
11. Forrest LF, Adams J, Rubin G, et al. The role of receipt and timeliness of treatment in socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer survival: Population-based, data-linkage study. Thorax 2015;70:138-45.
12. Nur U, Quaresma M, De Stavola B, et al. Inequalities in non-small cell lung cancer treatment and mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015;69:985-92.
13. Office for National Statistics. Cancer Registration Statistics, England: First release. Newport: Office for National Statistics, 2014.
14. Centre HaSCI. The National Clinical Lung Cancer Audit (LUCADA) Data Manual v3.1.5, 2013.
15. Shack LG. What factors influence socio-economic inequalities in colorectal cancer survival? London: School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 2009.
16. Benitez-Majano S, Fowler H, Maringe C, et al. Deriving stage at diagnosis from multiple population-based sources: Colorectal and lung cancer in England. Br J Cancer 2016;115:391-400.
17. Maringe C, Fowler H, Rachet B, et al. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of population-based administrative health data for the assessment of cancer non-related comorbidities. PLoS One 2017;12:e0172814.
18. Lim E, Baldwin D, Beckles M, et al. British Thoracic Society and the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland. Guidelines on the radical management of patients with lung cancer. Thorax 2010;65(Suppl 3):iii1-27.
19. Health and Social Care Information Centre. OPCS-4 Classification. http:// systems. hscic. gov. uk/ data/ clinicalcoding/ codingstandards/ opcs4.
20. National Cancer Intelligence Network. Site Specific Clinical Reference Groups (SSCRGs). 2013 http://www. ncin. org. uk/ cancer_ type_ and_ topic_ specific_ work/ cancer_ type_ specific_ work/ sscrgs (accessed 14 Oct 2014).
21. Department for Communities and Local Government. The English Indices of Deprivation 2010. London: Department for Communities and Local Government, 2011.
22. Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: Competing risks and multistate models. Stat Med 2007;26:2389-430.
23. Bartlett JW, Seaman SR, White IR, et al. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Multiple imputation of covariates by fully conditional specification: Accommodating the substantive model. Stat Methods Med Res 2015;24:462-87.
24. Carpenter JR, Kenward MG. Multiple imputation and its application. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley, 2013.
25. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011;30:377-99.
26. Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc, 2005.
27. Krieger N. Socioeconomic data in cancer registries. Am J Public Health 2001;91:156-7.
28. Johnson AM, Hines RB, Johnson JA, et al. Treatment and survival disparities in lung cancer: The effect of social environment and place of residence. Lung Cancer 2014;83:401-7.
29. Jiang X, Lin G, Islam KM. Socioeconomic factors related to surgical treatment for localized, non-small cell lung cancer. Soc Sci Med 2017;175:52-7.
30. Rich AL, Tata LJ, Free CM, et al. Inequalities in outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer: The influence of clinical characteristics and features of the local lung cancer service. Thorax 2011;66:1078-84.
31. Haneuse S, Lee KH. Semi-Competing Risks Data Analysis: Accounting for Death as a Competing Risk When the Outcome of Interest Is Nonterminal. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016;9:322-31.
32. Fischer B, Lassen U, Mortensen J, et al. Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET-CT. N Engl J Med 2009;361:32-9.
33. Berglund A, Holmberg L, Tishelman C, et al. Social inequalities in non-small cell lung cancer management and survival: A population-based study in central Sweden. Thorax 2010;65:327-33.
34. Peake MD. Deprivation, distance and death in lung cancer. Thorax 2015;70:108-9.
35. Crawford SM, Sauerzapf V, Haynes R, et al. Social and geographical factors affecting access to treatment of lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2009;101:897-901.
36. Raine R, Wong W, Scholes S, et al. Social variations in access to hospital care for patients with colorectal, breast, and lung cancer between 1999 and 2006: Retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 2010;340:b5479.
37. Vach W, Blettner M. Biased estimation of the odds ratio in case-control studies due to the use of ad hoc methods of correcting for missing values for confounding variables. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:895-907.
38. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009;338:b2393.
39. Peake MD, Thompson S, Lowe D, et al. Ageism in the management of lung cancer. Age Ageing 2003;32:171-7.
40. Janssen-Heijnen ML, Smulders S, Lemmens VE, et al. Effect of comorbidity on the treatment and prognosis of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 2004;59:602-7.
41. Chambers A, Routledge T, Pilling J, et al. In elderly patients with lung cancer is resection justified in terms of morbidity, mortality and residual quality of life?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10:1015-21.
42. Tracey E, McCaughan B, Badgery-Parker T, et al. Survival of Australian lung cancer patients and the impact of distance from and attendance at a thoracic specialist centre: A data linkage study. Thorax 2015;70:152-60.
43. Thomas AA, Pearce A, O'Neill C, et al. Urban-rural differences in cancer-directed surgery and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017;71:468-74.