Pretreatments, conditioned medium and co-culture increase the incidence of somatic embryogenesis of different cichorium species

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 121-131

  Couillerot, Jean Paul ^a   Windels, David ^b   Vazquez, Franck ^b   Michalski, Jean Claude ^a   Hilbert, Jean Louis ^a   Blervacq, Anne Sophie ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

ABA; AGP; Co culture; Polyamine; Totipotency

Indexed keywords

CICHORIUM; CICHORIUM ENDIVIA; CICHORIUM INTYBUS;

ARTICLE; CHICORY; COCULTURE; CULTURE MEDIUM; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;

CHICORY; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; CULTURE MEDIA, CONDITIONED;

EID: 85052277288     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.7.1.18637     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Blervacq AS, Lucau-Danila A, Couillerot JP, Morcillo F, Aberlenc-Bertossi F. Hawkins et al. Stem cell-like cells and plant regeneration. In: Generation and characterization of stem cells. In: LV Bernhardt ed. Advances in Medicine and Biology, vol 15, New York, Nova Science Publishers, 2011:1-60.
2. Vasseur J, Dubois J, Hilbert JL, Couillerot JP. Somatic embryogenesis in chicory (Cichorium species). In: Bajaj YS ed. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Berlin, Springer Verlag, 1995:125-137.
3. Alcázar R, Marco F, Cuevas JC, Patron M, Fernando A, Carrasco P, et al. Involvement of polyamines in plant response to abiotic stress. Biotechnol Lett 2006; 28: 1867-76; PMID:17028780; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9179-3
4. Couillerot JP, Decout E, Warnot F, Dubois J, Vasseur J. Evolution des polyamines libres en relation avec la source carbonée et l'embryogenèse somatique chez un Cichorium hybride. C R Acad Sci Paris 1993; 316:299-305.
5. Helleboid S, Couillerot JP, Hilbert JL, Vasseur J. Inhibition of direct somatic embryogenesis by á-difluoromethylarginine in a Cichorium hybrid: effects on polyamine content and protein patterns. Planta 1995; 196:571-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00203658
6. Wu XB, Wang J, Liu JH, Deng XX. Involvement of polyamine biosynthesis in somatic embryogenesis of Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) induced by glycerol. J Plant Physiol 2009; 166:52-62; PMID: 18448195; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.02.005
7. Habibi N, Suthar RK, Purohit SD. Role of PGrs and inhibitors in induction and control of somatic embryogenesis in Themeda quadrivalvis. Indian J Exp Biol 2009; 47:198-203; PMID:19405386
8. Nishiwaki M, Fujino K, Koda Y, Masuda K, Kikuta Y. Somatic embryogenesis induced by the simple application of abscisic acid to carrot (Daucus carota L.) seedlings in culture. Planta 2000; 211:756-9; PMID: 11089691; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004250000387
9. Li L, Qu R. In vitro somatic embryogenesis in turf-type bermudagrass: roles of abscisic acid and gibberellic acid, and occurrence of secondary somatic embryogenesis. Plant Breed 2002; 121:155-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00684.x
10. Ogata Y, Iizuka M, Nakayama D, Ikeda M, Kamada H, Koshiba T. Possible involvement of abscisic acid in the induction of secondary somatic embryogenesis on seedcoat- derived carrot somatic embryos. Planta 2005; 221:417-23; PMID:15770487; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-004-1449-5
11. Sholi NJY, Chaurasia A, Agraval A, Sarin NB. ABA enhances plant regeneration of somatic embryos derived from cell suspension cultures of plantain cv. spambia (Musa sp.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2009; 99: 133-40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9585-z
12. Rai MK, Shekhawat NS, Gupta HAK, Phulwaria M, Ram K, Jaiswal U. The role of abscisic acid in plant tissue culture: a review of recent progress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2011; 106:179-90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9923-9
13. Samaj J, Baluska F, Bobak M, Volkmann D. Extracellular matrix surface network of embryogenic units of friable maize callus contains arabinogalactanproteins recognized by monclonal antibody JIM4. Plant Cell Rep 1999; 18:369-74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002990050588
14. Chapman A, Helleboid S, Blervacq AS, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. Removal of the fibrillar network surrounding Cichorium somatic embryos using cytoskeleton inhibitors: analysis of proteic components. Plant Sci 2000; 150:103-14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00185-5
15. Abedin M, King N. Diverse evolutionary paths to cell Adhesion. Trends Cell Biol 2010; 20:734-42; PMID: 20817460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.002
16. Seifert GJ, Blaukopf C. Irritable Walls: The Plant Extracellular Matrix and Signaling. Plant Physiol 2010; 153:467-78; PMID:20154095; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.153940
17. Attree SM, Moore D, Sawhney VR, Fowke LC. Enhanced maturation and desiccation tolerance of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench.] Voss) somatic embryos: effects of non-plasmolyzing water stress and abscisic acid. Ann Bot (Lond) 1991; 68:519-25.
18. Ling You X, Seon Y, Choi EY. Cellular change and callose accumulation in zygotic embryos of Eleutherococcus senticosus caused by plasmolysisng pretreatment result in high frequency of single-cell-derived somatic embryos. Protoplasma 2006; 227:105-12; PMID:16736252; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-006-0149-3
19. Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y. Phytosulfokine, sulfated peptides that induce the proliferation of single mesophyll cell of Asparagus officinalis L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:7623-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7623
20. Kobayashi T, Eun CH, Hanai H, Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y, Kamada H. Phytosulfokin-a, a peptidyl plant growth factor, stimulates somatic embryogenesis in carrot. J Exp Bot 1999; 50:1123-8.
21. Hanai H, Matsuno T, Yamamoto M, Matsubayashi Y, Kobayashi T, Kamada H, et al. A secreted peptide growth factor, phytosulfokine, acting as a stimulatory factor of carrot somatic embryogenesis formation. Plant Cell Physiol 2000; 41:27-32; PMID:10750705
22. Eun CH, Ko SM, Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y, Kamada H. Phytosulfokine-alpha requires auxine to stimulate carrot non-embryogenic cell proliferation. Plant Physiol Biochem 2003; 41:447-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00052-4
23. Tsuwamoto R, Fukuoka H, Takahata Y. Identification and characterization of genes expressed in early embryogenesis from microspores of Brassica napus. Planta 2007; 225:641-652; PMID:16977456; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0388-8
24. De Vries SC, Booij H, Meyerink P, Huisman G, Wilde HD, Thomas TL, et al. Acquisition of embryogenic potential in carrot-cell suspension. Planta 1988; 176: 196-204; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00392445
25. Komamine A, Matsumoto M, Tsukahara M, Fujiwara A, Kawahara R, Ito M, et al. Mechanism of somatic embryogenesis in cell-cultures physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. In: Nijkamp HJJ, Van der Plas LHW, Van Aartrijk J eds. Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol. 9, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1990:307-317.
26. Egertsdotter U, von Arnold S. Importance of arabinogalactan proteins for the development of somatic embryos of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Physiol Plant 1995; 93:334-45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb02237.x
27. Chapman A, Blervacq AS, Vasseur J, Hilbert JL. Arabinogalactan-proteins in Cichorium somatic embryogenesis: effect of beta-glucosyl Yariv reagent and epitope localisation during embryo development. Planta 2000; 211:305-14; PMID:10987548; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004250000299
28. Tang XC, He YQ, Wang Y, Sun MX. The role of arabinogalactan proteins binding to Yariv reagents in the initiation, cell developmental fate, and maintenance of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. cv. Topas. J Exp Bot 2006; 57:2639-50; PMID: 16829548; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl027
29. Lucau-Danila A, Laborde L, Legrand S, Huot L, Hot D, Lemoine Y, et al. Identification of novel gene potenially involved in somatic embryogenesis in chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). BMC Plant Biol 2010; 10:122; PMID:20565992; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-122
30. Bonga JM, Klimaszewska KK, von Aderkas P. Recalcitrance in clonal propagation, in particular of conifers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2010; 100:241-54; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9647-2
31. Bellettre A, Couillerot JP, Vasseur J. Effect of glycerol on somatic embryogenesis in Cichorium leaves. Plant Cell Rep 1999; 19:26-31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002990050705
32. Deng Z, Zhang W, Wan S. High frequency of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cellular calli and protoplasts in Citrus. Acta Biol Exp Sin 1990; 23:143-5.
33. Deo PC, Taylor M, Harding RM, Tyagi AP, Becker DK. Initiation of embryogenic cell suspensions of taro (Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta) and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2010; 100:283-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9648-1
34. Nakagawa H, Saijyo T, Yamauchi N, Shigyo M, Kako S, Ito A. Effects of sugars and abscisic acid on somatic embryogenesis from melon (Cucumis melo L.) expanded cotyledon. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 2001; 90:85-92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00259-4
35. Lou H, Kako S. Role of high sugar concentrations in inducing somatic embryogenesis from cucumber cotyledons. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 1995; 64:11-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(95)00833-8
36. Pullman GS, Chase KM, Skyabina A, Bucalo K. Conifer embryogenesis tissue initiation: improvements by supplementation of medium with D-xylose and D-chiro-inositol. Tree Physiol 2009; 29:147-56; PMID: 19203940; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpn013
37. Gandonou C, Errabii T, Abrini J, Idaomar M, Chibi F, Senhaji NS. Effect of genotype on callus induction and plant regeneration from leaf explants of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Afr J Biotechnol 2005; 4:1250-5.
38. Maraschin SF, de Priester W, Spaink HP, Wand M. Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective. J Exp Bot 2005; 56:1711-26; PMID:15928015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri190
39. Dussert S, Verdeil JL, Rival A, Noirot M, Buffard-Morel J. Nutrient uptake and growth of in vitro coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) calluses. Plant Sci 1995; 106:185-93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(95)04079-A
40. Kikuchi A, Sanuki N, Higashi K, Koshiba T, Kamada H. Abscisic acid and stress treatment are essential for the acquisition of embryogenic competence by carrot somatic cells. Planta 2006; 223:637-45; PMID: 16160844; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0114-y
41. Ivanova A, Velcheva M, Denchev P, Atanassov A, Van Onckelen HA. Endogenous hormone levels during direct somatic embryogenesis in Medicago falcata. Physiol Plant 1994; 92:85-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb06658.x
42. Senger S, Mock HP, Conrad U, Manteuffel R. Immunomodulation of ABA function affects early events in somatic embryo development. Plant Cell Rep 2001; 20:112-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002990000290
43. Kiyosue T, Satoh S, Kamada H, Harada H. Purication and immunohistochemical detection of an embryogenic cell protein in carrot. Plant Physiol 1991; 95:1077-83; PMID:16668093; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.95.4.1077
44. Rajasekaran K, Hein MB, Vasil IK. Endogenous abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid and somatic embryogenesis in cultures leaf explants of Pennisetum purpureum Schum. Plant Physiol 1987; 84:47-51; PMID:16665403; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.84.1.47
45. Bais HP, Sudha GS, Ravishankar GA. Putrescine and silver nitrate influences shoot multiplication, in vitro flowering and endogenous titers of polyamines in Cichorium intybus L. cv. Lucknow Local. J Plant Growth Regul 2000; 19:238-48; PMID:11038231
46. Verdeil JL, Alemanno L, Niemenak N, Tranbarger TJ. Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends Plant Sci 2007; 12: 245-52; PMID:17499544; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.002
47. Fowler MR, Kirby MJ, Scott NW, Slatter A, Elliott MC. Polyamine metabolism and gene regulation during the transition of autonomous sugar beet cell in suspension culture from quiescence to division. Physiol Plant 1996; 98:439-46; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb05697.x
48. Samaj J, Salaj T, Matusova R, Salaj J, Takac T, Samajova O, et al. Arabinogalactan-protein epitope Gal4 is differentially regulated and localized in cell lines of hybrid fir (Abies alba x Abies cephalonica) with different embryogenic and regeneration potential. Plant Cell Rep 2008; 27:221-9; PMID:17943290; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0429-1
49. Pan X, Yang X, Lin G, Zou R, Chen H, Samaj J, et al. Ultrastructural changes and the distribution of arabinogalactan proteins during somatic embryogenesis of banana (Musa spp. AAA cv. 'Yueyoukang 1'). Physiol Plant 2011; 142:372-89; PMID:21496030; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01478.x
50. Osuga K, Kamada H, Komamine A. Cell density is an important factor for synchronization of the late stage of somatic embryogenesis high frequency. Plant Tiss Cult Lett 1993; 10:180-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology1984.10.180
51. Shigeta JI, Sato K, Mii M. Effects of initial cell density, pH and dissolved oxygen on bioreactor production of carrot somatic embryos. Plant Sci 1996; 115:109-14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04327-O
52. Belletre A, Couillerot JP, Blervacq AS, Aubert S, Gout E, Hilbert JL, et al. Glycerol affects both carbohydrate metabolism and cytoskeletal rearrangements during the induction of somatic embryogenesis in chicory leaf tissues. Plant Physiol Biochem 2001; 39:503-11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(01)01263-3
53. Umehara M, Ogita S, Sasamoto H, Kamada H. Inhibitory factor(s) of somatic embryogenesis regulated suspensor differentiation in suspension culture of Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis Gordon). Plant Biotechnol 2004; 21:87-94; http://dx.doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.21.87
54. Kobayashi T, Higashi K, Saitou T, Kamada H. Physiological properties of inhibitory conditoning factor(s), inhibitory to somatic embryogenesis, in highdensity cell cultures of carrot. Plant Sci 1999; 144:69-75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00062-X
55. Osuga K, Kamada H, Komamine A. Frequency improvement of somatic embryogenesis at high embryo density by partial replacement of medium in carrot suspension cultures. J Ferment Bioengineering 1997; 84:275-278; doi:10.1016/S0922-338X(97)82070-3.
56. Bakos F, Drako E, Ponya Z, Barnabas B. Regeneration of fertile wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants from isolated zygotes using wheat microspore cultures as nurse cells. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2003; 74:243-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024071121083
57. Meijer EA, de Vries SC, Mordhorst AP. Co-culture with Daucus carota somatic embryos reveals high 2,4-D uptake and release rates of Arabidopsis thaliana cultured cells. Plant Cell Rep 1999; 18:656-63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002990050638
58. Schlutz C, Gilson P, Oxley D, Youl J, Bacic A. GPIanchors on arabinogalactan-proteins: implications for signalling in plants. Trends Plant Sci 1998; 3:426-31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01328-4
59. van Hengel AJ, van Kammen A, de Vries SC. A relationship between seed development, Arabinogalactanproteins (AGPs) and the AGP mediated promotion of somatic embryogenesis. Physiol Plant 2002; 114: 637-44; PMID:11975739; http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1140418.x
60. Verbruggen N, Hermans C. Proline accumulation in plants: a review. Amino Acids 2008; 35:753-9; PMID:18379856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6
61. Kong X, Sun L, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Liu Y, Pan J, et al. ZmMKK4 regulates osmotic stress through reactive oxygen species scavenging in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep 2011; 30:2097-104; PMID:21735232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1116-9
62. Verbruggen N, Villarroel R, Van Montagu M. Osmoregulation of a pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1993; 103: 771-81; PMID:8022935; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.3.771
63. Yoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress. Plant Cell Physiol 1997; 38:1095-102; PMID:9399433
64. Zhou J, Wang B, Zhu L. Conditioned culture for protoplasts isolated from Chrysanthemum: an efficient approach. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005; 45:113-119; PMID:16154327; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.07.012
65. Dyachok JV, Wiweger M, Kemme L, von Arnold S. Endogenous Nod-factor-like signal molecule promote early somatic embryo development in Norway spruce. Plant Physiol 2002; 128:523-33; PMID:11842156; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.010547
66. Tchorbadjieva M, Pantchev I, Harizanova N. Twodimensional protein pattern analysis of extracellular proteins secreted by embryogenic and non-embryogenic suspension cultures of Dactylis glomerata. Biotechnol, Biotechnol Equip 2004; 18:20-7.
67. Wendt dos Santos AL, Steier N, Guerra MP, Zoglauer K, Moerschbacher BM. Somatic embryogenesis in Araucaria angustifolia. Biol Plant 2008; 52:195-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-008-0044-1
68. Jacquard C, Mazeyrat-Gourbeyre F, Devaux P, Boutillier K, Bailleul F, Clément C. Microspore embryogenesis in barley: anther pretreatment stimulates plant defence gene expression. Planta 2009; 229: 393-402; PMID:18974997; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0838-6
69. Chapman A, Blervacq AS, Tissier JM, Delbreil B, Hendriks T, Vasseur J, et al. Cell wall differenciation during early somatic embryogenesis in plants. I. SEM and TEM study on somatic embryos originated from direct, indirect and adventitious pathway. Can J Bot 2000; 78:816-23.
70. Baldan B, Bertoldo A, Navazio L, Mariani P. Oligogalacturonide-induces changes in the developmental pattern of Daucus carota L. somatic embryos. Plant Sci 2003; 165:337-48; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00193-6
71. Lo Schiavo F, Giuliano G, de Vries SC, Genga A, Bollini R, Pitto L, et al. A carrot cell variant temperature sensitive for somatic embryogenesis reveals a defect in the glycosylation of extracellular proteins. Mol Gen Genet 1990; 223:385-93; PMID:2270078; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00264444
72. Folling M, Madsen S, Olesen A. Effect of nurse culture and conditioned medium on colony formation and plant regeneration from Lolium perenne protoplasts. Plant Sci 1995; 108:229-39; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(95)04146-L
73. Toonen MAJ, Schmidt EDL, van Kammen A, de Vries SC. Promotive and inhibitory effects of diverse arabinogalactan proteins in Daucus carota L. somatic embryogenesis. Planta 1997; 203:188-95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004250050181
74. Kobayashi T, Higashi K, Sasaki K, Asami T, Yoshida S, Kamada H. Purification from conditioned medium and chemical identification of a factor that inhibits somatic embryogenesis in carrot. Plant Cell Physiol 2000; 41:268-73; PMID:10805589
75. Umehara M, Ogita S, Sasamoto H, Koshino H, Asami T, Fijioka S, et al. Identification of a novel factor, vanillyl benzyl ether, which inhibits somatic embryogenesis of japanese larch (Larix leptolepis Gordon). Plant Cell Physiol 2005; 46:445-53; PMID: 15695457; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pci041
76. Umehara M, Ogita S, Sasamoto H, Eun CH, Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y, et al. Two stimulatory effects of the peptidyl growth factor phytosulfokine during somatic embryogenesis in japanese larch (Larix leptolepis Gordon). Plant Sci 2005; 109:901-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.06.008
77. Legrand S, Hendriks T, Hilbert JL, Quillet MC. Characterization of expressed sequence tags obtained by SSH during somatic embryogenesis in Cichorium intybus L. BMC Plant Biol 2007; 7:27-39; PMID: 17553130; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-27
78. Park MH, Suzuki Y, Chono M, Knox JP, Yamaguchi I. CsAGP1, a gibberellin-responsive gene from cucumber hypocotyls, encodes a classical arabinogalactan protein and is involved in stem elongation. Plant Physiol 2003; 131:1450-9; PMID:12644694; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.015628
79. Sun W, Kieliszewski MJ, Showalter AM. Overexpression of tomato LeAGP1- arabinogalactan protein promotes lateral branching and hampers reproductive development. Plant J 2004; 40:870-81; PMID: 15584953; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02274.x
80. Heller R. Recherches sur la nutrition minérale des tissues végétaux cultivés in vitro. Ann Sci Nat Bot Biol Veg 1953; 14:1-223.
81. Dubois T, Dubois J, Guedira M, Vasseur J. Embryogenèse somatique directe sur les styles de Cichorium: effets de la température et origine des embryoïdes. C R Acad Sci Paris 1988; 307:669-75.
82. Kreuger M, Van Holst GJ. Arabinogalactan-proteins epitopes in somatic embryogenesis in Daucus carota. Planta 1995; 197:135-41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00239949
83. Yariv J, Rapport MM, Graf L. The interaction of glucosides and saccharides with antibody to the corresponding phenylglycosides. Biochem J 1962; 85:383-8; PMID:14002491
84. van Holst GJ, Clarke AE. Quantification of arabinogalactan- protein in plant extracts by single radial gel diffusion. Anal Biochem 1985; 148:446-50; PMID: 3933380; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90251-9