Does the patient always benefit?

The Quality and Outcomes Framework: QOF - Transforming General Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 128-134

  Wilkie, Patricia ^a  

^a National Association for Patient Participation (NAPP)   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85051992436     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Tahrani AA, McCarthy M, Gordon J, et al. Diabetes care and the new contract: the evidence for a whole country. Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57: 483-5.
2. Steel N, Maisey S, Clark A, et al. Quality of primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57: 449-54.
3. Mangin D, Toop L. The Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have you done to yourselves? Br J Gen Pract. 2007; 57(539): 435-7.
4. Health Care Republic QOF Nurse Survey-Are Targets Damaging Patient Care? Available at: www.healthcarerepublic.com/news/772331/.
5. Mangin, Toop, Health Care Republic QOF Nurse Survey-Are Targets Damaging Patient Care? Available at: www.healthcarerepublic.com/news/772331/.
6. Coulter A, Elwyn G. What do patients want from high-quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement? Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52 (Suppl): S22-6.
7. Campbell SM, McDonald R, Lester H. The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med. 2008; 6: 228-34.
8. Health Care Republic QOF Nurse Survey, 2008; 6: 228-34.
9. Gulliford MC, Naithani S, Morgan M. Measuring continuity of care in diabetes mellitus: an experience-based measure. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4: 548-55.
10. Wilkie P. The person, the patient and their carers. In: Faull C, Carter Y, Woof R, editors. Handbook of Palliative Care. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998. pp. 55-63.
11. Gulliford, Naithani, Morgan, The person, the patient and their carers. In: Faull C, Carter Y, Woof R, editors. Handbook of Palliative Care. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998. pp. 55-63.
12. Health Care Republic QOF Nurse Survey, Oxford: Blackwell; 1998. pp. 55-63.
13. Baker R, Bankart MJ, Murtagh GM. Do the quality and outcome framework patient experience indicators reward practices that offer improved access. Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 50(565): 584-9.
14. Starfield B, Shi I, Macinko J. Contributions of primary care to health systems and health. Millbank Q. 2005; 83: 457-50.
15. Sibbald B. Who needs doctors in general practice? Qual Prim Care. 2008; 16: 73-4.
16. Health Care Republic QOF Nurse Survey, 2008; 16: 73-4.
17. Sibbald, 2008; 16: 73-4.
18. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M. General practice workload implications of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2001; 323: 269-70.
19. Barr R. Quality in practice. Nurs Stand. 2005; 19: 22-3.
20. Griffiths P, Murrells T, Mahen J, et al. Nurse staffing and quality of care in UK general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely collected data. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60: 34-9.
21. Picker Institute. Annual Review 2005/6. Being treated like a person not a number, that's what counts for me. Oxford: Picker Institute Europe; 2006.
22. Nolan Committee. First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. London: HMSO; 1995.
23. Royal College of Physicians. Doctors in Society; Medical Professionalism in a Changing Society. London: RCP; 2005.
24. O'Neill O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
25. Connell DG. Patient care - crunch time. Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 59: 546.
26. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: General Medical Council; 2003.