The experience of pay for performance in english family practice: A qualitative study

Annals of Family Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 228-234

  Campbell, Stephen M ^a   McDonald, Ruth ^a   Lester, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Pay for performance; Primary health care; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INCOME; JOB PERFORMANCE; MALE; MEDICAL FEE; NURSE; PATIENT CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING STAFF; PHYSICIAN INCENTIVE PLANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS;

EID: 44149083975     PISSN: 15441709     EISSN: 15441717     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1370/afm.844     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Roland M. Linking physician pay to quality of care: a major experiment in the UK. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448-1454.
2. British Medical Association. Revisions to the GMS contract, 2006/07. Chapter 2. Improving quality in the UK. http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/ revisionnGMSFeb20062~chap2impquality. Accessed Oct 29, 2007.
3. Roland MO, Campbell SM, Bailey N, Whalley D, Sibbald B. Financial incentives to improve the quality of primary care in the UK: predicting the consequences of change. Prim Care Res Dev. 2006;7:18-26.
4. Fisher ES. Paying for performance - risks and recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(18):1845-1847.
5. Young GJ, White B, Burgess JF, et al. Conceptual issues in the design and implementation of pay for quality programs. A J Med Quality. 2005;20(3):144-150.
6. Rowe JW. Pay for performance and accountability: related themes in improving health care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(9):695-699.
7. Safavi K. Patient centred pay for performance: are we missing the target? J Healthc Manag. 2006;51(4):215-218.
8. Town R, Kane R, Johnson P, Butler M. Economic incentives and physicians' delivery of preventive care: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2):234-240.
9. Bokhour BG, Burgess JF, Hook JM, et al. Incentive implementation in physician practices: a qualitative study of practice executives perspectives on pay for performance. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(1 Suppl):73S-95S.
10. Binderman J, Kilo CM, Oldham J. Rethinking incentives. J Med Pract Manage. 2000;16(2):70-74.
11. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay for performance improve the quality of care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):265-272.
12. Wright J, Martin D, Cockings S, Polack C. Overall quality and outcomes framework scores lower in deprived areas. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(525):277-279.
13. Ashworth M, Seed P, Armstrong D, Durbaba S, Jones R. The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of care: a national survey using indicators from the quality and outcomes framework. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(539):441-448.
14. Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, et al. Family practice performance in the first year of the UK's new pay for performance scheme: good clinical practice or 'gaming'? N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):375-384.
15. Guthrie B, McLean G, Sutton M. Workload and reward in the Quality and Outcomes Framework of the 2004 general practice contract. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(532):836-841.
16. Sutton M, McLean G. Determinants of primary care medical quality measured under the new UK contract: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):389-390.
17. Tahrani AA, McCarthy M, Godson J, et al. Diabetes care and the new GMS contract. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(539):483-485.
18. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(2):181-190.
19. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Middleton E, Reeves D. Improvements in the quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study. BMJ. 2005;331(7525):1121-1125.
20. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage Publications; 1990.
21. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
22. Spooner A, Chapple A, Roland M. What makes British general practitioners take part in a quality improvement scheme? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001;6(3):145-150.
23. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC. National Academy Press; 2001.
24. McDonald R, Harrison S, Checkland K, Campbell SM. Roland M. Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. BMJ. 2007;334(7608):1333-1334.
25. Mercer SW, McGregor W. New contract reduces quality of patient-nurse relationship. BMJ. 2007;334(7583):8.
26. Wilson T, Roland MO, Ham C. The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients. J R Soc Med. 2006;99(1):24-48.
27. Information Centre. General and Personal Medical Services England 1996-2006. The Information Centre, London; 2007.
28. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, Stevenson FA, Barber N. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1246-1250.
29. Mangin D, Toop L. The quality and outcomes framework: what have you done to yourselves? Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(539):570-572.
30. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competencies of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(460):892-897.