Screening for cervical cancer us preventive services task force recommendation statement

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 320, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 674-686

  Curry, Susan J ^a   Krist, Alex H ^b,c   Owens, Douglas K ^d,e   Barry, Michael J ^f   Caughey, Aaron B ^g   Davidson, Karina W ^h   Doubeni, Chyke A ⁱ   Epling, John W ^j   Kemper, Alex R ^k   Kubik, Martha ^l   Seth Landefeld, C ^m   Mangione, Carol M ⁿ   Phipps, Maureen G ^o   Silverstein, Michael ^p   Simon, Melissa A ^q   Tseng, Chien Wen ^r,s   Wong, John B ^t  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Fairfax Family Practice Residency   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^j VIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k NATIONWIDE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^l TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^o BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^q NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^s PACIFIC HEALTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE   (United States)

^t TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE BURDEN; ETHNICITY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GEOGRAPHY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; ADULT; AGED; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR; VIROLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; CERVIX UTERI; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85051953635     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.10897     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. National Cancer Institute (NCI). Cancer Stat Facts: cervical cancer. NCI website. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html. Accessed June 28, 2018.
2. Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU, et al. Screening for Cervical Cancer With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing: A Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force: Evidence Synthesis No. 158. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018. AHRQ publication 15-05224-EF-1.
3. Kim JJ, Burger EA, Regan C, Sy S. Screening for Cervical Cancer in Primary Care: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018. AHRQ publication 15-05224-EF-2.
4. Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU, Senger CA, Durbin S, Weyrich MS. Screening for cervical cancer with high-risk human papillomavirus testing: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force [published August 21, 2018]. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2018 .10400
5. Kim JJ, Burger EA, Regan C, Sy S. Screening for cervical cancer in primary care: a decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force [published August 21, 2018]. JAMA. doi:10.1001 /jama.2017.19872
6. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012;16(3):175-204. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e31824ca9d5
7. Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(2):330-337. doi:10.1097 /AOG.0000000000000669
8. Benard VB, Watson M, Castle PE, Saraiya M. Cervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1117-1123.
9. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2015: With Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2016. Report 2016-1232.
10. Beavis AL, Gravitt PE, Rositch AF. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States. Cancer. 2017;123(6):1044-1050. doi:10.1002 /cncr.30507
11. Wang SS, Sherman ME, Hildesheim A, Lacey JV Jr, Devesa S. Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among white women and black women in the United States for 1976-2000. Cancer. 2004;100(5): 1035-1044. doi:10.1002/cncr.20064
12. Galic V, Herzog TJ, Lewin SN, et al. Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma histology in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(2): 287-291. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.012
13. Benard VB, Thomas CC, King J, Massetti GM, Doria-Rose VP, Saraiya M; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and screening-United States, 2007-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(44):1004-1009.
14. Andresen EM, Peterson-Besse JJ, Krahn GL, Walsh ES, Horner-Johnson W, Iezzoni LI. Pap, mammography, and clinical breast examination screening among women with disabilities: a systematic review. Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23(4):e205-e214. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2013.04.002
15. Tracy JK, Schluterman NH, Greenberg DR. Understanding cervical cancer screening among lesbians: a national survey. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:442. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-442
16. Peitzmeier SM, Reisner SL, Harigopal P, Potter J. Female-to-male patients have high prevalence of unsatisfactory Paps compared to non-transgender females: implications for cervical cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(5): 778-784. doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2753-1
17. Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Human papillomavirus (HPV) ACIP vaccine recommendations. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/hpv.html. Accessed June 28, 2018.
18. Panel on Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: human papillomavirus disease. National Institutes of Health website. https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/html/4/adult-and-adolescent-oi -prevention-and-treatment-guidelines/343/hpv. Accessed June 28, 2018.
19. Freeman HP, Wingrove BK. Excess Cervical Cancer Mortality: A Marker for Low Access to Health Care in Poor Communities. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities; 2005. NIH publication 05-5282.
20. American Cancer Society (ACS). Cervix at a glance. ACS website.https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/#!/cancer-site/Cervix. Accessed June 28, 2018.
21. Healthy People 2020. Cancer objectives. HealthyPeople.gov website. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic /cancer/objectives. Updated June 18, 2018. Accessed June 28, 2018.
22. Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(11):852]. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(12):880-891, W312. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424
23. Vesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, et al. Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force: Evidence Synthesis No. 86. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. AHRQ publication 11-05156-EF-1.
24. Owens DK, Whitlock EP, Henderson J, et al; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Use of decision models in the development of evidence-based clinical preventive services recommendations: methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(7):501-508. doi:10.7326 /M15-2531
25. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, et al. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1385-1394. doi:10 .1056/NEJMoa0808516
26. Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):105-113. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.043
27. Kulasingam SL, Havrilesky L, Ghebre R, Myers ER. Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. AHRQ publication 11-05157-EF-1.
28. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer screening (NTCC) Working Group. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(3):249-257. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70360-2
29. Ogilvie GS, Krajden M, van Niekerk D, et al. HPV for cervical cancer screening (HPV FOCAL): Complete round 1 results of a randomized trial comparing HPV-based primary screening to liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(2):440-448. doi:10.1002/ijc.30454
30. Leinonen MK, Nieminen P, Lönnberg S, et al. Detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions within one screening round of primary human papillomavirus DNA testing: prospective randomised trial in Finland. BMJ. 2012; 345:e7789. doi:10.1136/bmj.e7789
31. Canfell K, Caruana M, Gebski V, et al. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: results of the Compass pilot randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2017;14(9):e1002388. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002388
32. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening Working Group. Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology in primary screening of women younger than 35 years: results at recruitment for a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(7):547-555. doi:10.1016 /S1470-2045(06)70731-8
33. Ronco G, Segnan N, Giorgi-Rossi P, et al; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Working Group. Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(11):765-774. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj209
34. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening Working Group. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(7):492-501. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn065
35. Ogilvie GS, van Niekerk D, Krajden M, et al. Effect of screening with primary cervical HPV testing vs cytology testing on high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at 48 months: the HPV FOCAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320 (1):43-52. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.7464
36. Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1637]. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(16):1589-1597. doi:10.1056 /NEJMoa073204
37. Elfström KM, Smelov V, Johansson AL, et al. Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2014; 348:g130. doi:10.1136/bmj.g130
38. Kitchener HC, Fletcher I, Roberts C, Wheeler P, Almonte M, Maguire P. The psychosocial impact of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening-a study within a randomized trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(4):743-748. doi:10.1111/j .1525-1438.2007.01113.x
39. Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Gilham C, et al; ARTISTIC Trial Study Group. ARTISTIC: a randomised trial of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in primary cervical screening. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(51):1-150. doi:10.3310/hta13510
40. Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Thomson C, et al. HPV testing in combination with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical screening (ARTISTIC): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(7):672-682. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09) 70156-1
41. Rijkaart DC, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, et al. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0
42. C Kitchener H, Canfell K, Gilham C, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(23):1-196. doi:10.3310/hta18230
43. McCaffery K, Waller J, Forrest S, Cadman L, Szarewski A, Wardle J. Testing positive for human papillomavirus in routine cervical screening: examination of psychosocial impact. BJOG. 2004; 111(12):1437-1443. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004 .00279.x
44. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al; International HPV Screening Working Group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):524-532. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736 (13)62218-7
45. Zorzi M, Frayle H, Rizzi M, et al; Veneto HPV-screening Working Group. A 3-year interval is too short for re-screening women testing negative for human papillomavirus: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1585-1593. doi:10 .1111/1471-0528.14575
46. Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. [published correction appears in Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(8):722]. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):663-672. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045 (11)70145-0
47. Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras N, et al. Variable risk of cervical precancer and cancer after a human papillomavirus-positive test. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):650-656. doi:10.1097/AOG .0b013e318209da59
48. Gage JC, Katki HA, Schiffman M, et al. Age-stratified 5-year risks of cervical precancer among women with enrollment and newly detected HPV infection. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(7): 1665-1671. doi:10.1002/ijc.29143
49. Gage JC, Schiffman M, Katki HA, et al. Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(8): dju153. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju153
50. Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al. Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women who test Pap-negative but are HPV-positive. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17(5)(suppl 1):S56-S63. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e318285437b
51. Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al. Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17(5)(suppl 1):S28-S35. doi:10.1097 /LGT.0b013e318285423c
52. Ibáñez R, Autonell J, Sardà M, et al. Protecting the underscreened women in developed countries: the value of HPV test. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:574. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-574
53. Demarco M, Lorey TS, Fetterman B, et al. Risks of CIN 2+, CIN 3+, and cancer by cytology and human papillomavirus status: the foundation of risk-based cervical screening guidelines. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017;21(4):261-267. doi:10.1097/LGT .0000000000000343
54. Dijkstra MG, van Zummeren M, Rozendaal L, et al. Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands. BMJ. 2016;355:i4924. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4924
55. Castle PE, Kinney WK, Xue X, et al. Effect of several negative rounds of human papillomavirus and cytology co-testing on safety against cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(1):20-29. doi:10.7326/M17-1609
56. Coldman AJ, Gondara L, Smith LW, et al. Disease detection and resource use in the safety and control arms of the HPV FOCAL cervical cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(12):1487-1494. doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.368
57. Cook DA, Mei W, Smith LW, et al. Comparison of the Roche cobas® 4800 and Digene Hybrid Capture® 2 HPV tests for primary cervical cancer screening in the HPV FOCAL trial. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:968. doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1959-5
58. Ogilvie GS, van Niekerk DJ, Krajden M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening: trial design and preliminary results (HPV FOCAL Trial). BMC Cancer. 2010;10:111. doi:10.1186 /1471-2407-10-111
59. Bulkmans NW, Rozendaal L, Snijders PJ, et al. POBASCAM, a population-based randomized controlled trial for implementation of high-risk HPV testing in cervical screening: design, methods and baseline data of 44,102 women. Int J Cancer. 2004; 110(1):94-101. doi:10.1002/ijc.20076
60. Luyten A, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Luyten K, et al. Early detection of CIN3 and cervical cancer during long-term follow-up using HPV/Pap smear co-testing and risk-adapted follow-up in a locally organised screening programme. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135(6):1408-1416. doi:10.1002/ijc.28783
61. Petry KU, Luyten A, Scherbring S. Accuracy of colposcopy management to detect CIN3 and invasive cancer in women with abnormal screening tests: results from a primary HPV screening project from 2006 to 2011 in Wolfsburg, Germany. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(2):282-287. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno .2012.10.017
62. Dinkelspiel H, Fetterman B, Poitras N, et al. Screening history preceding a diagnosis of cervical cancer in women age 65 and older. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(2):203-206. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno .2012.04.037
63. Fox J, Remington P, Layde P, Klein G. The effect of hysterectomy on the risk of an abnormal screening Papanicolaou test result. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(5):1104-1109. doi:10.1016/S0002 -9378(99)70601-0
64. Pearce KF, Haefner HK, Sarwar SF, Nolan TE. Cytopathological findings on vaginal Papanicolaou smears after hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(21):1559-1562. doi:10.1056/NEJM199611213352103
65. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Clinical preventive service recommendation: cervical cancer. AAFP website. https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/cervical-cancer.html. 2018. Accessed June 28, 2018.
66. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 168: cervical cancer screening and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):e111-e130. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001708