Erratum (DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70156-1);HPV testing in combination with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical screening (ARTISTIC): a randomised controlled trial

The Lancet Oncology

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 672-682

  Kitchener, Henry C ^a   Almonte, Maribel ^b   Thomson, Claire ^a   Wheeler, Paula ^a   Sargent, Alexandra ^a   Stoykova, Boyka ^c   Gilham, Clare ^d,e   Baysson, Helene ^d   Roberts, Christopher ^a   Dowie, Robin ^c   Desai, Mina ^f   Mather, Jean ^f   Bailey, Andrew ^f   Turner, Andrew ^f   Moss, Sue ^e   Peto, Julian ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^e INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^f MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VIRUS DNA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDYLOMA ACUMINATUM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; VIRUS IDENTIFICATION; WART VIRUS;

EID: 67649382952     PISSN: 14702045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70211-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. Cuzick J., Clavel C., Petry K., et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 119 (2006) 1095-1101
2. Solomon D., Schiffman M., and Tarone R. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 93 (2001) 293-299
3. Arbyn M., Buntinx F., Van Ranst M., Paraskevaidis E., Martin-Hirsch P., and Dillner J. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 280-293
4. Naucler P., Ryd W., Tornberg S., et al. Human papillomavirus and papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 357 (2007) 1589-1597
5. Bulkmans N., Berkhof J., Rozendaa F., et al. Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial. Lancet 370 (2007) 1764-1772
6. NICE. Appraisal on liquid based cytology: advice to the service. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA69_LBC_review_FullGuidance.pdf (accessed June 8, 2009).
7. Kitchener H., Almonte M., Wheeler P., et al. HPV testing in routine cervical screening: cross sectional data from the ARTISTIC trial. Br J Cancer 95 (2006) 56-61
8. Lorincz A.T. Hybrid capture method for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in clinical specimens: a tool for clinical management of equivocal Pap smears and for population screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 22 (1996) 629-636
9. Peto J., Gilham C., Fletcher O., and Matthews F. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 364 (2004) 249-256
10. Arbyn M., Bergeron C., Klinkhamer P., Martin-Hirsch P., Siebers A.G., and Bulten J. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol 111 (2008) 167-177
11. Siebers A.G., Klinkhamer P., Arbyn M., Raifu A., Massuger L., and Bulten J. Cytologic detection of cervical abnormalities using liquid-based compared with conventional cytology. Obstet Gynecol 112 (2008) 1327-1334
12. Beerman H., van Dorst E.B., Kuenen-Boumeester V., and Hogendoorn P.C. Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program. Gynecol Oncol (2009) 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.012 published online Jan 16.
13. Davey E., d'Assuncao J., Irwig L., et al. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study. BMJ 335 (2007) 31-35
14. Ronco G., Cuzick J., Pierotti P., et al. Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening randomised controlled trial. BMJ 335 (2007) 28
15. Information Centre for Health and Social Care. Cervical screening programme, England 2007/2008. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/screening/cervical-cancer/cervical-screening-programme-2007-08-%5Bns%5D (accessed June 8, 2009).
16. Elfgren K., Rylander E., Radberg T., et al. Colposcopic and histopathologic evaluation of women participating in population-based screening for human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid persistence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005) 650-657
17. Pretorius R.G., Bao Y., Belinson J.L., Burchette R.J., Smith J.S., and Qiao Y. Inappropriate gold standard bias in cervical cancer screening studies. Int J Cancer 121 (2007) 2218-2224
18. Kitchener H.C., Fletcher I., Roberts C., Wheeler P., Almonte M., and Maguire P. The psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening-a study within a randomised trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18 (2007) 743-748