A review on graphene–TiO2 and doped graphene–TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalyst for water and wastewater treatment

Environmental Technology Reviews

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-14

  Bhanvase, B A ^a   Shende, T P ^a   Sonawane, S H ^b  

^a LAXMINARAYAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

doping; Graphene; nanocomposite; photocatalyst; TiO2

Indexed keywords

DOPING (ADDITIVES); HOLE MOBILITY; METAL IONS; METALS; NANOCOMPOSITES; ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; OXIDE MINERALS; PHOTOCATALYSTS; TIO2 NANOPARTICLES; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT;

DEGRADATION OF POLLUTANTS; ELECTRON HOLE PAIRS; HIGH ELECTRON MOBILITY; PHOTO CATALYTIC DEGRADATION; PREPARATION METHOD; TIO2; TIO2 PHOTOCATALYST; WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENTS;

GRAPHENE;

EID: 85051706888     PISSN: 21622515     EISSN: 21622523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21622515.2016.1264489     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. 2/UV-A treatment for reactive dye wastewater. J Environ Eng. 2000;126:903–911. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:10(903)
2. 2; catalyst under UV light irradiation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2012;19:2305–2312. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-0739-x
3. Forgacs E, Cserháti T, Oros G., Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review. Environ Int. 2004;30:953–971. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.02.001
4. 2 catalyst. Chemosphere. 2002;48:1103–1111. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00201-1
5. 2 nanocomposite with high photocatalytic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 2011;345:101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2011.05.026
6. 2 photocatalyst. Appl Catal B: Environ. 2011;108–109:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.08.017
7. 2-graphene composite with enhanced photovoltaic and photocatalytic properties by electrospinning. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4:581–585. doi: 10.1021/am201448p
8. 2 photocatalyst and its photooxidation of ethanol. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105:2815–2819. doi: 10.1021/jp004295e
9. 2 composites. Adv Mater. 2009;21:2233–2239. doi: 10.1002/adma.200802738
10. 2-assisted photodegradation of dyes under visible irradiation: a probe for the interfacial electron transfer process and reaction mechanism. J Phys Chem B. 2002;106:318–324. doi: 10.1021/jp0119025
11. Felizzetti E, Minero C, Maurino V., The role of colloidal particles in the photodegradation of organic compounds of environmental concern in aquatic systems. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 1990;32:271–316. doi: 10.1016/0001-8686(90)80021-Q
12. 2 surfaces. J Mol Catal. 1990;60:375–387. doi: 10.1016/0304-5102(90)85260-O
13. 2/UV process: increased rates of degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol. 1995;29:2567–2573. doi: 10.1021/es00010a017
14. Fujishima A., Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature. 1972;238:37–38. doi: 10.1038/238037a0
15. 2 and some ions. Langmuir. 2002;18:3247–3254. doi: 10.1021/la015685a
16. 2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem Rev. 1995;95:735–758. doi: 10.1021/cr00035a013
17. 4 for photocatalytic decomposition of organic contaminants in air and water with UV-vis light. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:1563–1569. doi: 10.1021/ie200544z
18. 2 films. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:2385–2393. doi: 10.1021/ja056494n
19. 2 nanotubes under UV and visible light. Appl Catal B: Environ. 2010;97:354–360. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.04.017
20. Zou ZG, Ye J, Sayama K, et al. Direct splitting of water under visible light irradiation with an oxide semiconductor photocatalyst. Nature. 2001;414:625–627. doi: 10.1038/414625a
21. 2 photocatalyst on selected food-borne pathogenic bacteria. Chemosphere. 2003;52:277–281. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00051-1
22. 2 photocatalysis. Carbon. 2011;49:741–772. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.010
23. 2-based photocatalysts by carbon and nitrogen doping. J Catal. 2008;260:128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.09.016
24. 2 photocatalysts. 2. Optical characterization, photocatalysis, and potential application to air purification. Chem Mater. 2005;17:2596–2602. doi: 10.1021/cm049099p
25. Sun H, Wang S, Ang HM, et al. Halogen element modified titanium dioxide for visible light photocatalysis. Chem Eng J. 2010;162:437–447. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.069
26. 2 photocatalysis under UV/visible light: selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier transfer dynamics. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:13211–13241. doi: 10.1021/jp204364a
27. Han F, Kambala VSR, Srinivasan M, et al. Tailored titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater treatment: a review. Appl Catal A-Gen. 2009;359:25–40. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.043
28. 2 photocatalyst with metals, nonmetals and metal oxides. Energy Environ Sci. 2010;3:715–726. doi: 10.1039/b927575d
29. Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CWK, et al. Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res. 2010;44:2997–3027. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039
30. Malato S, Fernandez-Ibanez P, Maldonado MI, et al. Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: recent overview and trends. Catal Today. 2009;147:1–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.018
31. 2 visible photocatalyst with a mesoporous structure prepared via a nonhydrolytic sol-gel route. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:18965–18969. doi: 10.1021/jp0751108
32. 3−/I− shuttle redox mediator. Chem Commun. 2005;30:3829–3831. doi: 10.1039/b505646b
33. 2 on visible light reactivity in aqueous suspensions. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:14093–14101. doi: 10.1021/jp047777p
34. 2:V4+ photocatalyst. Nanomater Nanotechnol. 2012;2:2–14. doi: 10.5772/55318
35. 2 under visible light irradiation. J Nanomater. 2014;2014:1–6.
36. Sakthivel S, Kisch H., Daylight photocatalysis by carbon-modified titanium dioxide. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:4908–4911. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351577
37. 2 nanotube composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Catal. 2012;2:949–956. doi: 10.1021/cs200621c
38. 2 nanocrystals grown on graphene as advanced photocatalytic hybrid materials. Nano Res. 2010;3:701–705. doi: 10.1007/s12274-010-0033-5
39. Banerjee AN, Joo SW, Min B., Photocatalytic degradation of organic dye by sol-gel-derived Gallium-doped anatase titanium oxide nanoparticles for environmental remediation. J Nanomater. 2012;2012:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2012/201492
40. 2 photocatalyst performance for decolorization in the presence of hydrodynamic cavitation as hybrid AOP. Ultrason Sonochem. 2016;28:150–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.07.008
41. Alfano OM, Bahnemann D, Cassano AE, et al. Photocatalysis in water environments using artificial and solar light. Catal Today. 2000;58:199–230. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00252-2
42. Yeh TF, Chan FF, Hsieh CT, et al. Graphite oxide with different oxygenated levels for hydrogen and oxygen production from water under illumination: the band positions of graphite oxide. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:22587–22597. doi: 10.1021/jp204856c
43. Wang G, Shen X, Wang B, et al. Synthesis and characterisation of hydrophilic and organophilic graphene nanosheets. Carbon. 2009;47:1359–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.027
44. Wang Y, Huang Y, Song Y, et al. Room-temperature ferromagnetism of graphene. Nano Lett. 2009;9:220–224. doi: 10.1021/nl802810g
45. 2) nanocomposites prepared by conventional and novel surfactant wrapping sol-gel methods exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal B: Environ. 2009;89:503–509. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.01.009
46. 2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf Sci Rep. 2008;63:515–582. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001
47. 2 solar cells. J Phys Chem B. 2000;104:8989–8994.
48. 2 particles. J Phys Chem. 1995;99:4215–4224. doi: 10.1021/j100012a050
49. 2 heterojunctions. Catal Today. 2005;101:315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.038
50. 2 anatase thin films. J Appl Phys. 1994;75:2042–2047. doi: 10.1063/1.356306
51. Anpo M, Kamat PV., Environmentally benign photocatalysts: applications of titanium oxide-based materials. New York: Springer; 2010.
52. Zhang H, Lv X, Li Y, et al. P25-graphene composite as a high performance photocatalyst. ACS Nano. 2010;4:380–386. doi: 10.1021/nn901221k
53. 2 under visible light. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:147–152. doi: 10.1021/es025617q
54. 2 nanoparticles assembled on graphene oxide nanosheets with high photocatalytic activity for removal of pollutants. Carbon. 2011;49:2693–2701. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.059
55. 2-graphene nanocomposites. UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2008;2:1487–1491. doi: 10.1021/nn800251f
56. Fu D, Han G, Chang Y, et al. The synthesis and properties of ZnO–graphene nano hybrid for photodegradation of organic pollutant in water. Mater Chem Phys. 2012;132:673–681. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.085
57. Zou W, Zhu J, Sun Y, et al. Depositing ZnO nanoparticles onto graphene in a polyol system. Mater Chem Phys. 2011;125:617–620. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.10.008
58. Zhu J, Li Y, Chen Y, et al. Graphene oxide covalently functionalized with zinc phthalocyanine for broadband optical limiting. Carbon. 2011;49:1900–1905. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.014
59. 2-carbon composite materials? ACS Nano. 2010;4:7303–7314. doi: 10.1021/nn1024219
60. Yang Y, Liu T., Fabrication and characterization of graphene oxide/zinc oxide nanorods hybrid. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257:8950–8954. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.070
61. 2 films under UV and visible irradiation. Curr Appl Phys. 2011;11:805–808. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2010.11.077
62. Williams G, Kamat PV., Graphene-semiconductor nanocomposites: excited-state interactions between ZnO nanoparticles and graphene oxide. Langmuir. 2009;25:13869–13873. doi: 10.1021/la900905h
63. 2-graphene nanocomposite as high performance photocatalysts. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:25209–25218. doi: 10.1021/jp207515z
64. Sreeprasad TS, Maliyekkal SM, Lisha KP, et al. Reduced graphene oxide–metal/metal oxide composites: facile synthesis and application in water purification. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186:921–931. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.100
65. Shen J, Yan B, Shi M, et al. One step hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2-reduced graphene oxide sheets. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:3415–3421. doi: 10.1039/c0jm03542d
66. Jeong GH, Kim SH, Kim M, et al. Direct synthesis of noble metal/graphene nanocomposites from graphite in water: photo-synthesis. Chem Commun. 2011;47:12236–12238. doi: 10.1039/c1cc15091j
67. Hu H, Wang X, Liu F, et al. Rapid microwave-assisted synthesis of graphene nanosheets-zinc sulfide nanocomposites: optical and photocatalytic properties. Synthetic Metals. 2011;161:404–410. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.12.018
68. 2 nanoflower composites with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:12255–12262. doi: 10.1039/c3ta12329d
69. Muthirulan P, Devi CKN, Sundaram MM., Fabrication and characterization of efficient hybrid photocatalysts based on titania and graphene for acid orange seven dye degradation under UV irradiation. Adv Mat Lett. 2014;5:163–171. doi: 10.5185/amlett.2013.7507
70. Jeong H, Lee Y, Lahaye R, et al. Evidence of graphitic AB stacking order of graphite oxides. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:1362–1366. doi: 10.1021/ja076473o
71. 2 photocatalysts for water purification: an overview. Bol Grupo Español Carbón. 2014;32:9–14.
72. 2/graphene composite with high lithium storage capability for lithium rechargeable batteries. Nano Res. 2010;3:813–821. doi: 10.1007/s12274-010-0050-4
73. Adán-Más A, Wei D., Photoelectrochemical properties of graphene and its derivatives. Nanomaterials. 2013;3:325–356. doi: 10.3390/nano3030325
74. Jin S, Xie L, Ma Y, et al. Low-temperature expanded graphite for preparation of graphene sheets by liquid-phase method. J Phys Conf Ser. 2009;188:23–27. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/188/1/012040
75. 2 nano-composite for photocatalytic removal of pharmaceuticals from water. World Congress on Water, Climate and Energy. 1–4.
76. Pan X, Zhao Y, Wang S, et al. TiO2/graphene nanocomposite for photocatalytic application. In: Materials and processes for energy: communicating current research and technological developments. Badajoz: Formatex; 2013. p. 913–920.
77. Zhang W, He W, Jing X., Preparation of a stable graphene dispersion with high concentration by ultrasound. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:10368–10373. doi: 10.1021/jp1037443
78. Oh W, Chen M, Zhang K, et al. The effect of thermal and ultrasonic treatment on the formation of graphene-oxide nanosheets. J Korean Phys Soc. 2010;56:1097–1102. doi: 10.3938/jkps.56.1097
79. 2 nanoparticles on graphene oxide nanosheets using a novel ultrasound assisted in situ chemical precipitation method. Chem Eng Process. 2013;70:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2013.05.008
80. 4–graphene nanocomposite for lithium rechargeable batteries. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensification. 2014;83:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2014.07.004
81. 2/graphene composite for solar energy conversion. Synth Metals. 2012;162:827–833. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.03.014
82. 2 and graphene oxide for photocatalytic decolorization of methylene blue. Chem Eng J. 2012;193–194:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.047
83. Wang P, Jiang T, Zhu C, et al. One-step, solvothermal synthesis of graphene–CdS and graphene–ZnS quantum dot nanocomposites and their interesting photovoltaic properties. Nano Res. 2010;3:794–799. doi: 10.1007/s12274-010-0046-0
84. Zhang X, Cui X., Graphene/semiconductor nanocomposites: preparation and application for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nanocomposites–New Trends Dev, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. 2012;10:239–257.
85. Ojha K, Anjaneyulu O, Ganguli AK., Graphene-based hybrid materials: synthetic approaches and properties. Curr Sci. 2014;107:397–418.
86. Divya KS, Umadevi TU, Mathewa S., Graphene-based semiconductor nanocomposites for photocatalytic applications. J Nanosci Lett. 2014;4:21.
87. 2 and carbon nanotubes [PhD dissertation]. University of Florida; 2004.
88. 4 paper and its application for magnetic-controlled switches. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:17465–17471. doi: 10.1021/jp105629r
89. 4 nanoparticles and its enhanced optical limiting property. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010;10:2984–2987. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2010.2175
90. Qamar M, Muneer M., A comparative photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide by investigating the degradation of vanillin. Desalination. 2009;249:535–540. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.01.022
91. 2/graphene nanoporous electrodes with three-dimensionally delaminated flexible structure. Nano Lett. 2009;9:72–75. doi: 10.1021/nl802484w
92. 2–graphene with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem–A Eur J. 2011;17:8379–8387. doi: 10.1002/chem.201100250
93. Li B, Liu T, Wang Y, et al. ZnO/graphene-oxide nanocomposite with remarkably enhanced visible-light driven photocatalytic performance. J Coll Interface Sci. 2012;377:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.03.060
94. 2 nanoparticles. Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:6482–6486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052518299
95. 2 nanoparticles. Appl Catal B: Environ. 2005;57:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.10.001
96. Xiang QJ, Yu JG, Jaroniec M., Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:782–796. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15172J
97. 2/rGO) hybrids under visible light. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;389:1084–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.180
98. 2 hybridized with graphene composite under solar light. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;106:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.023
99. 2/NiO composites. Desalination. 2010;252:163–166. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.10.007
100. 2 at nanoscale. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures. 2013;8:1525–1535.
101. 4 nanocomposite as a recollectable photocatalyst with enhanced durability. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2012;2012:4439–4444. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201200454
102. 2 nanotube arrays as electrode under visible light. Chemosphere. 2016;165:268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.143
103. 2/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanocomposite material for efficient photocatalytic degradation of Eosin Blue dye under visible light irradiation. J Alloy Compd. 2017;694:596–606. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.329