Propagating and Debunking Conspiracy Theories on Twitter during the 2015-2016 Zika Virus Outbreak

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 485-490

  Wood, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

conspiracy theories; rumor; social network analysis; Twitter; Zika virus

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SOCIAL NETWORK; ZIKA VIRUS; DECEPTION; EPIDEMIC; GROUP PROCESS; PROPAGANDA; SOCIAL MEDIA; ZIKA FEVER;

DECEPTION; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; PROPAGANDA; SOCIAL MEDIA; ZIKA VIRUS; ZIKA VIRUS INFECTION;

EID: 85051629209     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0669     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Bordia P, Difonzo N. Problem solving in social interactions on the Internet: rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly 2004; 67:33-49.
2. Mendoza M, Poblete B, Castillo C. (2010) Twitter under crisis. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics-SOMA'10, New York, NY: ACM; pp. 71-79.
3. Parsons S, Simmons W, Shinhoster F, et al. A test of the grapevine: an empirical examination of conspiracy theories among african americans. Sociological Spectrum 1999; 19: 201-222.
4. DiFonzo N, Bordia P. Rumor, gossip and urban legends. Diogenes 2007; 54:19-35.
5. Van Prooijen JW, Van Dijk E. When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: the moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2014; 55:63-73.
6. Wood MJ, Douglas KM. Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology 2015; 6:836.
7. Oh O, Agrawal M, Rao HR. Community intelligence and social media services: a rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly 2013; 37:407-426.
8. Starbird K. Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. Icwsm17 2017; (Icwsm):230-239.
9. Starbird K, Spiro E, Edwards I, et al. (2016) Could this be true? I think so! Expressed uncertainty in online rumoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI'16. San Jose, CA: ACM; pp. 360-371.
10. Kou Y, Gui X, Chen Y, et al. (2017) Conspiracy talk on social media: collective sensemaking during a public health crisis. In: PACM on Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: ACM; 61: p. 2.
11. Swami V, Furnham A, Smyth N, et al. Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences 2016; 99:72-76.
12. Wood MJ, Douglas KM. What about building 7? ''A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories.'' Frontiers in Psychology 2013; 4:409.
13. Wood MJ. Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology 2017;108:507-527.
14. Centers for Disease Control. (2016) Zika: the basics of the virus and how to protect against it. https://www.cdc.gov/ zika/pdfs/fs-zika-basics.pdf (Accessed June 29, 2018).
15. Dredze M, Broniatowski DA, Hilyard KM. Zika vaccine misconceptions: a social media analysis. Vaccine 2016; 34: 3441-3442.
16. Melley T. (2002) Agency panic and the culture of conspiracy. In: Knight P. (ed). Conspiracy Nation the Politics of Paranoia in Postwar America. New York, NY: New York University Press; pp. 57-81.
17. Wood MJ, Douglas KM, Sutton RM. Dead and alive: beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2012; 3:767-773.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159.
19. Janson H, Olsson U. A measure of agreement for interval or nominal multivariate observations by different sets of judges. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2004; 64: 62-70.
20. Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, et al. (2012) Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/irr.pdf (accessed April 2, 2018).
21. Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems 2006; 1695:1-9.
22. Fellows I. (2015) Package 'wordcloud'. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wordcloud/wordcloud.pdf
23. Byford J. (2011) Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Porterfield A. Activists behind Zika virus conspiracy theories, Argentine pesticide birth defect scare. Genetic Literacy Project 2016. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/ 03/29/activists-behind-zika-virus-conspiracy-theoriesargentine-pesticide-birth-defect-scare/. (accessed November 20, 2017).
25. Souza M, Vieira R. (2012) Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Data for Portuguese Language. In PROPOR'12 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language. Coimbra, Portugal: Springer-Verlag; pp. 241-247.
26. Correa JC, Camargo JE. Ideological consumerism in Colombian elections, 2015: links between political ideology, Twitter activity, and electoral results. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2017; 20:37-43.
27. Butter M, Knight P. Bridging the great divide: conspiracy theory research for the 21st century. Diogenes 2016: 1-13.
28. Miller JM, Saunders KL, Farhart CE. Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: the moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science 2015; 60:824-844.
29. Uscinski JE, Klofstad C, Atkinson MD. What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly 2016; 69:57-71.
30. Slim H. By what authority? The legitimacy and accountability of non-governmental organisations. International Meeting on Global Trends and Human Rights-Before and After September 11. Geneva: The International Council on Human Rights Policy, 2002; 1-11.