Seismic design aids for nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete structures

Seismic Design Aids for Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-227

  Chandrasekaran, Srinivasan ^a,b   Nunziante, Luciano ^b   Serino, Giorgio ^b   Carannante, Federico ^b  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY;

CONSTITUTIVE MATERIALS; MOMENT ROTATION CHARACTERISTICS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS METHODS; NONLINEAR CHARACTERISTICS; NONLINEAR PROPERTIES; NUMERICAL PROCEDURES; PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENTS;

NONLINEAR ANALYSIS;

EID: 85051451451     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (70)

1. Abu-Lebdeh, T.M. and Voyiadjis, G.Z. 1993. Plasticity-damage model for concrete under cyclic multi-axial loading. ASCE. J. Eng. Mech. 119:1465-1484.
2. Amador, G. and Nadyane, B.-A. 2008. Cumulative ductility spectra for seismic design of ductile structures subjected to long duration motions. Concept and theory background. J Eq. Eng. 12(1):152-172.
3. ATC-40. 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology.
4. Bangash, M.Y.H. 1989. Concrete and concrete structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publications.
5. Candappa, D.C., Sanjayan, J.G., and Setunge, S. 2001. Complete stress-strain curves of high strength concrete. ASCE. J. Mat. Civil Eng. 13:209-215.
6. Carreira, D. and Chu, K.H. 1986. The moment-curvature relationship of RC members. ACI J. 83:191-198.
7. Challamel, N. and Hjiaj, M. 2005. Non-local behaviour of plastic softening beams. J. Acta Mech. 178:125-146.
8. Chandrasekaran, S., Nunzinate, L., Serino, G., and Carannante, F. 2008a. Axial force-bending moment limit domain and flow rule for reinforced concrete elements using Euro Code. Int. J. Damage Mech. doi.: 10.1177/1056789 508101200.
9. Chandrasekaran, S., Nunzinate, L., Serino, G., and Carannante, F. 2008b. Nonlinear seismic analyses of high rise reinforced concrete buildings. IcFai Uni. J. Struct. Eng. 1(1):1-7.
10. Chandrasekaran, S., Nunziante, L., Serino, G., and Carannante, F. 2008c. Axial force-bending moment failure interaction and deformation of reinforced concrete beams using Euro Code. J. Struct. Eng. SERC 35(1):16-25.
11. Chandrasekaran, S., and Roy, A. 2004. Comparison of modal combination rules in seismic analysis of multi-storey RC frames. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Vib. Engrg. and Tech (Vetomac), IIT Kanpur, India: 161-169.
12. Chandrasekaran, S. and Roy, A. 2006. Seismic evaluation of multi storey RC frames using modal push over analysis. J. Nonlinear Dyn. 43(4):329-342.
13. Chandrasekaran, S., Serino, G., and Gupta, V. 2008. Performance assessment of buildings under seismic loads. In: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Struct. under Shock and Impact Loads (SUSI), Algarve, Portugal: 313-322.
14. Chandrasekaran, S., Tripati, U.K., and Srivastav, M. 2003. Study of plan irregularity effects and seismic vulnerability of moment resisting RC framed structures. In: Proc. 5th Asia-Pacific Conf. Shock and Impact Loads, Changsa, China: 125-136.
15. Chao, H.H., Yungting, A.T. and Ruo, Y.H. 2006. Nonlinear pushover analysis of infilled concrete frames. J. Eq. Eng. and Eng. Vib. 5(2):245-255.
16. Chen, A.C.T. and Chen, W.F. 1975. Constitutive relations for concrete. ASCE J. Eng. Mech. 101:465-481.
17. Chen, W.F. 1994a. Constitutive equations for engineering materials, vol. 1: Elasticity and modelling. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publications.
18. Chen, W.F. 1994b. Constitutive equations for engineering materials, vol. 2: Plasticity and modelling. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publications.
19. Chopra, A.K. 2003. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 2nd ed. Singapore: Pearson Education.
20. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. 2000. Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF system. J. Struct. Eng. 126(4):482-490.
21. D.M. 2005, 14 Settembre. Norme tecniche per le Costruzioni. Rome, Italy (in Italian).
22. D.M. 9 gennaio. 1996. Norme tecniche per il calcolo, l'esecuzione ed il collaudo delle strutture in cemento armato normale e precompresso e per le strutture metalliche. Rome, Italy (in Italian).
23. Esra, M.G. and Gulay, A. 2005. A study on seismic behaviour of retrofitted building based on nonlinear static and dynamic analysis. J. Eq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 4(1):173-180.
24. Eurocode: UNI ENV 1991-1. Eurocodice 1. 1991. Basi di calcolo ed azioni sulle strutture. Parte 1: Basi di calcolo. (in Italian)
25. Eurocode: UNI ENV 1991-2. Eurocodice 1. 1991. Basi di calcolo ed azioni sulle strutture. Parte 2-1: Azioni sulle strutture-Massa volumica, pesi propri e carichi imposti (in Italian).
26. Fan, Sau-Cheong and Wang, F. 2002. A new strength criterion for concrete. ACI J. Struct. 99:317-326.
27. FEMA 440. 2005. Improvements of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Washington, D.C.: FEMA.
28. FEMA 450. 2004. NEHRP recommended provisions and commentary for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), Washington, D.C.: FEMA.
29. Ganzerli, S., Pantelides, C.P., and Reaveley, L.D. 2000. Performance based design using structural optimization. J. Eq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29:1677-1690.
30. Ghobarah, A. 2001. Performance based design in earthquake engineering: state of development. J. Eng. Struct. 23:878-884.
31. Gilbert, R.I. and Smith, S.T. 2006. Strain localization and its impact on the ductility of RC slabs containing welded wire reinforcement. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 9(1):117-127.
32. Hognestad, E., Hanson, N.W., and McHenry, D. 1955. Concrete stress distribution in ultimate strength design. ACI J. 52(6):455-479.
33. Hsieh, S.S., Ting, E.C., and Chen, W.F. 1982. A plastic-fracture model for concrete. J. Solids Struct. 18:181-197.
34. IS 456. 2000. Plain and reinforced concrete: Code of practice. Fourth revision. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
35. IS 1893. 2002. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1. General provisions for buildings, fifth revision. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
36. IS 13920. 1993. Ductile detailing for reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
37. Jirasek, M. and Bazant, Z.P. 2002. Inelastic analysis of structures. New York: Wiley.
38. Khan, A.R., Al-Gadhib, A.H., and Baluch, M.H. 2007. Elasto-damage model for high strength concrete subjected to multi-axial loading. Int. J. Damage Mech. 16(3):367-398.
39. Ko, M.Y., Kim, S.W., and Kim, J.K. 2001. Experimental study on the plastic rotation capacity of reinforced high strength beams. J. Mat. Struct. 34:302-311.
40. Lopes, S.M.R. and Bernardo, L.F.A. 2003. Plastic rotation capacity of high-strength concrete beams. J. Mat. Struct. 36:22-31.
41. Mahin, S., Anderson, E., Espinoza, A., Jeong, H., and Sakai, J. 2006. Sustainable design considerations in the construction to resist the effects of strong earthquakes. In: Proc. 4th Int. Workshop Seismic Design and Retrofit of Transportation Facilities. Burlingame, CA: 10.
42. Menetrey, P.H. and Willam, K.J. 1995. Tri-axial failure criterion for concrete and its generalization. ACI J. Struct. 92:311-318.
43. Mo, Y.L. 1992. Investigation of reinforced concrete frame behaviour: Theory and tests. Mag. Conc. Res. 44(160):163-173.
44. Nunziante, L., Gambarotta, L., and Tralli, A. 2007. Scienza della Costruzioni. Milan: McGraw- Hill (in Italian).
45. Nunziante, L. and Ocone, R. 1988. Limit design of frames subjected to seismic loads. Napoi, Italy: CUEN Publications (Cooperativa Universitaria Editrice Napoletana).
46. Ordinanza 3316: Correzioni e modifiche all'ordinanza 3274. 2005. Modifiche ed integrazioni all'ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3274 del 20 Marzo 2003. Rome, Italy (in Italian).
47. Ordinanza del presidente del consiglio dei ministri del 20 marzo. 2003. Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. Rome, Italy (in Italian).
48. Ottosen, N.S. 1977. A failure criterion for concrete, ASCE. J. Eng Mech. 103:527-535.
49. Pankaj, A. and Manish, S. 2006. Earthquake resistant design of structures. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.
50. Papadrakakis, M., Fragiadakis, M., and Lagaros, N.D. 2007. Extreme man-made and natural hazards in dynamics of structures. Dordrect: Springer.
51. Park, H. and Kim, H. 2003. Microplane model for reinforced concrete planar members in tension-compression. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 129:337-345.
52. Park, R. and Paulay, T. 1975. Reinforced concrete structures. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
53. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. 1992. Seismic design of RC and masonry buildings. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
54. Pfrang, E.O., Siess, C.P., and Sozen, M.A. 1964. Load-moment-curvature characteristics of RC cross-sections. ACI J. 61(7):763-778.
55. Pisanty, A. and Regan, P.E. 1993. Redistribution of moments and the possible demand for ductility. CEB Bulltn d' Information 218:149-162.
56. Pisanty, A. and Regan, P.E. 1998. Ductility requirements for redistribution of moments in RC elements and a possible size effect. J. Mat. Struct. 31:530-535.
57. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., and Kowalsky, M.J. 2007. Displacement based seismic design of structures, Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
58. Raphel, F., Marak, V.W., and Truszcynski, M. 2002. Constraint LINGO: A program for solving logic puzzles and other tabular constraint problems. Berlin: Springer.
59. Rustem, S. 2006. Structural damage evaluation. J. Jpn. Assoc. Eq. Eng. 4(2):39-47.
60. Sankarasubramaniam, G. and Rajasekaran, S. 1996. Constitutive modelling of concrete using a new failure criterion. J. Comp. and Struct. 58:1003-1014.
61. SAP2000 Advanced Version: 10.1.2. Structural Analysis Program, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, CA (http://www.csiberkeley.com).
62. SEAOC. 1995. Performance based seismic engineering of buildings: Vision 2000 report. California, USA: Structural Engineers Association of California.
63. Sforza, A. 2002. Modelli e metodi della Ricerca Operativa. Roma: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane (In Italian).
64. Sinan, A. and Asli, M. 2007. Assessment of improved nonlinear static procedures in FEMA 440. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 133(9):1237-1246.
65. Student LINGO. 2005. Parameter optimization software. Release 9.0: LINGO Sys Inc.
66. Sumarec, D., Sekulovic, M., and Krajcinovic, D. 2003. Failure of RC beams subjected to three point bending. Int. J. Damage Mech. 12(1):31-44.
67. Wolfram Mathematica Software. Ver 6.0.0. for Windows Platform: Wolfram Research Inc.
68. Wood, R.H. 1968. Some controversial and curious developments in plastic theory of structures. In: Engineering plasticity (J. Heyman, FA. Leckie eds). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 665-691.
69. Yakut A., Yilmaz, N., and Bayili, S. 2001. Analytical assessment of seismic capacity of RC framed building. J. Jpn. Assoc. Eq. Eng. 6(2):67-75.
70. Zhang, Y. and Der Kiureghian, A. 1993. Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures. J. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 108:23-36.