Videoconference compared to telephone in healthcare delivery: A systematic review

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 118, Issue , 2018, Pages 44-53

  Rush, Kathy L ^a   Howlett, Laura ^b   Munro, Arlin ^b   Burton, Lindsay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Systematic review; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Telephone; Videoconference

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; MEDICAL COMPUTING; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE;

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTHCARE DELIVERY; HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELEHEALTH; VIDEOCONFERENCE;

TELEPHONE SETS;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CINAHL; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EMBASE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICATION ERROR; MEDLINE; MORTALITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TELECONSULTATION; TELEHEALTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEOCONFERENCING; DECISION MAKING; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE;

DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 85050854075     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.07.007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Inglis, S.C., Clark, R.A., Dierckx, R., Prieto‐Merino, D., Cleland, J.G., Structured telephone support or non‐invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure. Cochrane Libr. 103:4 (2015), 255–257.
2. Vassilev, I., Rowsell, A., Pope, C., Kennedy, A., O'Cathain, A., Salisbury, C., et al. Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review. Implement. Sci., 10(1), 2015, 59.
3. Lee, S.W.H., Chan, C.K.Y., Chua, S.S., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Comparative effectiveness of telemedicine strategies on type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci. Rep., 7(1), 2017, 12680.
4. Kotb, A., Cameron, C., Hsieh, S., Wells, G., Comparative effectiveness of different forms of telemedicine for individuals with heart failure (HF): a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(2), 2015, e0118681.
5. Seto, E., Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review. Telemed. E-health 14:7 (2008), 679–686.
6. Downes, M.J., Mervin, M.C., Byrnes, J.M., Scuffham, P.A., Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review. Syst. Rev., 6(1), 2017, 128.
7. Stickland, M.K., Jourdain, T., Wong, E.Y., Rodgers, W.M., Jendzjowsky, N.G., MacDonald, G.F., Using Telehealth technology to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can. Respir. J. 18:4 (2011), 216–220.
8. Davis, R.M., Hitch, A.D., Salaam, M.M., Herman, W.H., Zimmer-Galler, I.E., Mayer-Davis, E.J., TeleHealth improves diabetes self-management in an underserved community: diabetes TeleCare. Diabetes Care 33:August (8) (2010), 1712–1717.
9. García‐Lizana, F., Muñoz‐Mayorga, I., Telemedicine for depression: a systematic review. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 46:2 (2010), 119–126.
10. Ward, M.M., Jaana, M., Natafgi, N., Systematic review of telemedicine applications in emergency rooms. Int. J. Media Inf. Lit. 84:9 (2015), 601–616.
11. Clifford, B.K., Mizrahi, D., Sandler, C.X., Barry, B.K., Simar, D., Wakefield, C.E., et al. Barriers and facilitators of exercise experienced by cancer survivors: a mixed methods systematic review. Support. Care Cancer, 2017, 1–16.
12. Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A.C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 49:1 (2012), 47–53.
13. Meyer, B.C., Raman, R., Hemmen, T., Obler, R., Zivin, J.A., Rao, R., et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 7:September (9) (2008), 787–795.
14. Wong, H.T., Poon, W.S., Jacobs, P., Goh, K.Y., Leung, C.H., Lau, F.L., et al. The comparative impact of video consultation on emergency neurosurgical referrals. Neurosurgery., 59(September (3)), 2006, 607 13; discussion 607-613.
15. Handschu, R., Scibor, M., Willaczek, B., Nuckel, M., Heckmann, J.G., Asshoff, D., et al. Telemedicine in acute stroke: remote video-examination compared to simple telephone consultation. J. Neurol. 255:November (11) (2008), 1792–1797 2008.
16. Dharmar, M., Kuppermann, N., Romano, P.S., Yang, N.H., Nesbitt, T.S., Phan, J., et al. Telemedicine consultations and medication errors in rural emergency departments. Pediatrics. 132:December (6) (2013), 1090–1097.
17. Jerant, A.F., Azari, R., Nesbitt, T.S., Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure: a randomized trial of a home telecare intervention. Med. Care 39:Novemebr (11) (2001), 1234–1245.
18. McCrossan, B., Morgan, G., Grant, B., Sands, A.J., Craig, B.G., Doherty, N.N., et al. A randomised trial of a remote home support programme for infants with major congenital heart disease. Heart. 98:20 (2012), 1523–1528 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society.
19. Kobak, K.A., Williams, J.B., Jeglic, E., Salvucci, D., Sharp, I.R., Face-to-face versus remote administration of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale using videoconference and telephone. Depress. Anxiety 25:11 (2008), 913–919.
20. Richter, K.P., Shireman, T.I., Ellerbeck, E.F., Cupertino, A.P., Catley, D., Cox, L.S., et al. Comparative and cost effectiveness of telemedicine versus telephone counseling for smoking cessation. J. Med. Internet Res., 17(May (5)), 2015, e113.
21. Van Dyk, L., A review of telehealth service implementation frameworks. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11:2 (2014), 1279–1298.
22. Saver, J.L., Time is brain–quantified. Stroke 37:January (1) (2006), 263–266.
23. Bolle, S.R., Larsen, F., Hagen, O., Gilbert, M., Video conferencing versus telephone calls for team work across hospitals: a qualitative study on simulated emergencies. BMC Emerg. Med. 9:22 (2009), 9–22 Nov 30;9:22,227X-9-22.
24. Clegg, A., Relton, C., Young, J., Witham, M., Improving recruitment of older people to clinical trials: use of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design. Age Ageing 44:4 (2015), 547–550.
25. van der Velden, Joanne M., Verkooijen, H.M., Young-Afat, D.A., Burbach, J.P., van Vulpen, M., Relton, C., et al. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46:1 (2016), 96–102.
26. Rush, K.L., Hatt, L., Janke, R., Burton, L., Ferrier, M., Tetrault, M., The efficacy of telehealth delivered educational approaches for patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Patient. Educ. Couns. 101:8 (2018), 1310–1321.